|  | 		    
					
        
         
          
         
	
          | |  | What is the first thing you do when you st~ Fra : bostan332
 | 
 Dato :  30-10-11 12:44
 | 
 |  | 
 The short answer is: you start out to get, steal, procure or
 manufacture one or two working nuclear weapons no matter the cost.
 
 This is your insurance. And Syria, perhaps, made a mistake at this
 point some years ago.
 
 The other way round, being a half-decent state as it were, pretending
 not to possess one or two small atom bombs while negotiating for
 decades with the International Atomic Energy Agency and the great
 powers about not constructing the atom bombs you are constructing
 belongs to the world of wishful thinking, which is the soothing deceit
 the great powers tell the general public it needs.
 
 You get the idea: there probably are or will soon be other powers than
 Iran in that situation. And you are not properly informed by the
 government controlled press and tv about that issue.
 
 Steen Hjortsoe
 
 
 |  |  | 
  Bo Warming (30-10-2011) 
 
	
          | |  | Kommentar Fra : Bo Warming
 | 
 Dato :  30-10-11 23:36
 | 
 |  | On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT), bostan332
 <steenhjortsoe@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 >
 >The short answer is: you start out to get, steal, procure or
 >manufacture one or two working nuclear weapons no matter the cost.
 >
 >This is your insurance. And Syria, perhaps, made a mistake at this
 >point some years ago.
 >
 >The other way round, being a half-decent state as it were, pretending
 >not to possess one or two small atom bombs while negotiating for
 >decades with the International Atomic Energy Agency and the great
 >powers about not constructing the atom bombs you are constructing
 >belongs to the world of wishful thinking, which is the soothing deceit
 >the great powers tell the general public it needs.
 >
 >You get the idea: there probably are or will soon be other powers than
 >Iran in that situation. And you are not properly informed by the
 >government controlled press and tv about that issue.
 >
 >Steen Hjortsoe
 
 Samme dobbeltmoral om at du skal have avancerede våben for at være
 respekteret oplevede Japan da de sku have krigsskib og ku tæve
 russerne for at ses som "hvide"
 Læs min trådstart denne time  om 1905-krig
 
 For at tæve russerne angreb man uden krigserklæring for sadan har
 konfuzianere gjort i årtusinde
 
 Times og NewYork aviser roste japanernes mod til skyerne i 1905
 
 Men da Pearl Harbour blev angrebet uden krigserklærig var alle Vestens
 aviser DOBBELTMORALSKE og fordøme hvad de før havde rost
 
 
 |  |  | 
  Bo Warming (30-10-2011) 
 
	
          | |  | Kommentar Fra : Bo Warming
 | 
 Dato :  30-10-11 23:39
 | 
 |  | On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT), bostan332
 <steenhjortsoe@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 >
 >The short answer is: you start out to get, steal, procure or
 >manufacture one or two working nuclear weapons no matter the cost.
 >
 >This is your insurance. And Syria, perhaps, made a mistake at this
 >point some years ago.
 >
 >The other way round, being a half-decent state as it were, pretending
 >not to possess one or two small atom bombs while negotiating for
 >decades with the International Atomic Energy Agency and the great
 >powers about not constructing the atom bombs you are constructing
 >belongs to the world of wishful thinking, which is the soothing deceit
 >the great powers tell the general public it needs.
 >
 >You get the idea: there probably are or will soon be other powers than
 >Iran in that situation. And you are not properly informed by the
 >government controlled press and tv about that issue.
 Du har ret i at det er elendig dobbeltmoral kun at respektere
 atommagter
 
 
 |  |  | 
 |  |