"Lars" <ledj@DONTSPAMprivat.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:3b7786e7$0$265$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
>
> > Da de nu er faldet i pris spekulerer jeg på at udskifte mit Matrox
G-400.
>
> Hercules Prophet 4500 Kyro 2 er på højde med Matrox og ATI og har
ovenikøbet
> en ret god 3d performance...
Det er Tech Repport ikke helt enige med dig i....
"First, the bad news: the 3D Prophet 4500 has one of the dimmest signal
outputs of any graphics card I have (and I have a lot of 'em). Plug it into
a monitor adjusted for another card, and white background looks gray, the
colors washed out. It's not the end of the world; crank up the brightness
and contrast on a good monitor, and the problem disappears. In the grand
scheme, it's a subtle difference. But not everyone-and especially not
everyone buying a budget video card-has a really good monitor.
I mentioned this concern to Hercules, and they swapped out my test card for
a new one. The second card's output was just like the first's. This is
probably an issue with the Kyro II chip's integrated RAMDAC and with the
initial brightness and contrast settings in the Kyro drivers. I suggested to
Hercules that brightness and contrast sliders in their drivers might help
mitigate the problem, and right afterwards, I installed the latest Kyro
drivers. Lo and behold, they'd just incorporated a gamma slider. The gamma
adjustments help, but contrast controls would still be a welcome addition.
In all, the 4500 is a decent enough 2D display card, but those of you who
will accept only the highest quality signal output (especially those with
gigantic monitors) would do well to consider a Radeon instead."
Men de er fuld af lovord for billedkvaliteten i 3D læs selv på
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2001q3/prophet-4500/index.x?pg=1
> /lars
>
>