--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sømand1" <someone@yahoooo.pdf>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:32 PM
Newsgroups: dk.livssyn.kristendom
Subject: Inkvisition?
For den interesserede i dette emne vil jeg anbefale bogen "THE SCIENTIFIC
ORIGINS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM" By Daniel Gasman.
Den påviser at Nazi livssynet (Hitlers livssyn) var et uundgåelig og direkte
resultat af Darwinismen.
Evolutionary Paradigm as a Basis for Eugenics, Genocide and Infanticide.
Bogen kan findes på biblioteket, (
http://tinyurl.com/6d2w2dg )
og så linket her. Jeg er dog ikke sikker på om hele bogen er at finde på
dette link.
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Gasman.htm
Jeg tror vi har hørt om Ernest Haeckel.
"Hitler's indebtedness to Haeckel lies in the underlying ideology at the
heart of significant parts of his conversations, speeches, and writings.
They show a basic kinship with the principles and even with some of the
formulations of Haeckelian social Darwinism and with Monism. Hitler' s views
on history, politics, religion, Christianity, nature, eugenics, science,
art, and evolution, however eclectic, and despite the plurality of their
sources, coincide for the most part with those of Haeckel and are more than
occasionally expressed in very much the same language. Naturally, this is
not to deny the influence on Hitler of many other writers and Volkish
intellectuals, for it is apparent, that Hitler's views were far too
heterogeneous a compilation to be limited to a single source. Yet, the
evidence does seem to show parallels and affinities between Hitler and
Haeckel that so far have not been satisfactorily explored and determined. In
the thought of Hitler, as in that of Haeckel, social Darwinism was brought
together under the rubric of evolutionary religion and it is this common
feature of their thought which indissolubly binds them together and makes
them part of one intellectual tradition. Both Hitler and Haeckel shared a
common sense of mission in regard to man and to his relationship to nature.
In his general outlook on the world Hitler protested as much as Haeckel did
that the great defect of modern Western society was that man was in constant
violation of nature. As Ernst Nolte has expressed it, Hitler was in 'dread'
of the forces of 'antinature.' He believed that there were 'certain basic
structures of social existence' which were 'threatened' by the
'transcendence' in man, by his quest for freedom and equality, and by his
uncalled for rebellion against the dictates of nature. In his
Weltanschauung, therefore, Hitler was 'afraid of man for man' and defended
human culture as he understood it against the Western tradition. Like
Haeckel he sought to curb the 'germs of disintegration' within society by
returning to the paths marked out by nature. For Hitler, therefore, social
Darwinism was not simply the idea of struggle. It was the holy conception of
nature and understood in this way his idea of the world was
indistinguishable from that of Haeckel.67...