/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
First Correct Human Rights Declaration - A~
Fra : Koos Nolst Trenite


Dato : 07-07-10 06:00

Als u dit wilt vertalen, neem dan contact met mij op) NL
(Si vous voulez traduire ceci, s'il vous plaît contactez-moi) FR
(Hvis du ønsker at oversætte dette, bedes du kontakte mig) DK
(Wenn Sie dies übersetzen möchten, kontaktieren Sie mich bitte) DE

'

'

The First Correct Human Rights Declaration: ARTICLE TWO

2 January 2010
{HRD-02 20100102-V1.4}

(Version 1.4
on 6 Jul 2010)

'

'

Preamble and Article Two

'

ARTICLE TWO is, summarized:

Everyone has the right, audibly or visually to communicate
constructively - and in an educated, or informed, or observing
way - to others and to the society, about any matter and about
any person; and doing so, will by its very nature offend some
individuals and some, possibly even large, groups.

'

Preamble:

Human Rights have to be well enough connected to Life itself,
in order to have any real value, in order to be followed and to
be enforceable and enforced.

Luck has it, for you, now, that - though YOU do not anymore
understand Life itself, I still do, or rather - I have regained
that understanding and knowledge,

due to my being gifted in Love, in Beauty and in Truth, above
all.

So much so and solely because of that, it came about that
I desired and then could and then did, in two-third of a
life time, pull myself out of your very poor, and mostly
false and destructive "understanding" of Life.

'

While Ms Roosevelt may have played an active and admirable role,
to have the old 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights' ready
and adopted globally,

exactly at my day of birth, on 10 December 1948,

she, Ms Roosevelt, had no clue about Life nor about her famous
husband, 'World War Two president' "FDR" Roosevelt, to any
amount required,

but, one can run, one can speak, and one can love, without
knowing anything about how or why running, or speaking, or
loving, works as it does - and some even prefer not to know.

She, the 'mother of the old Universal Declaration of Human
Rights,' and her helpers of that time, are, in any case, very
warmly thanked for their enthusiasm and for their strong efforts
- they gave all they could, and they gave it with the best of
their intentions - which are appreciated.

But again:

'


Human Rights have to be well enough connected to Life itself,
in order to have any real value so that they can be followed,
and so that they are also naturally enforceable, and enforced.

So here we go (as I promised some time ago, I would write these
for you), with Article Two.

'

'

2. ARTICLE TWO {HRD-02} of the First Correct Human Rights Declaration

'

ARTICLE TWO

2.a. Everyone has the right to communicate audibly or visually
- in a constructive way and while being either educated in
or informed about or observing, the matter communicated
about - to those around him and to the society,

and regardless about what matter or about which person,

and whether that offends anybody in any position, has no
bearing on the action whatsoever, because it is a natural
and most valuable part of this Human Right, the Right to
point out especially those truths, that are likely to make
some feel offended.

Any such communication will ALWAYS be offensive to SOME
individuals or groups, and occasionally even to large
groups.

2.b. When the offended then turn violent, it does NOT mean, that
the communication is destructive, BUT it DOES mean, that
the offended are destructive - thus it is those offended
who have to be censured, also REGARDLESS of their social
position:

A person who cannot hear the truth, or who even feels, that
he has to act criminally upon it, must not be in a position
of authority, anyway.

And truth happens to be indelible, and thus absolute:
It means 'Who did what with what intention,' and it can
be spoken and heard.

Criminal Minds however, want all that "seen" in reverse,
and THEY claim, that for instance exposing the truth of
their Hate, "is an act of Hate ON THEM."

You have to know about these, that they want themselves to
have the feeling, and to make others feel too, that
everything is THE REVERSE of what is truth.

2.c. Those who are deceived into feeling "just and honest" while
actively fighting for the lies of others, those are most
easily and "very righteously" offended, by any truthful
statement on the subject, and they are most likely to
express their feelings with Hate (violent Energy) or also
with their Hate turned into physical violence.

2.d. In particular those, whose thinking and feeling and
perception is strongly dominated and blinded by Criminal
Minds, and who thus admire, defend or even work for
Criminal Minds, will feel most intensely offended by any
communication of truth, to them or to others.

Criminal Minds by definition want to have truth kept
hidden, or not observed, or not understood, and replaced.

2.e. Also Criminal Minds themselves, will pretend to be heavily
offended, or will encourage others to feel very offended
(and will encourage them to express it by means of Hate or
physical violence) as long as those Criminal Minds believe,
that such a display, or an attitude of 'being personally
or collectively offended,' will aid them in continuing
to dominate the perception and the feelings and thus the
actions of others.

2.f. Criminal Minds use "being offended" as a tool, to dominate
others into not looking at them and others as they actually
are; and they use it as a tool to prevent the exchange of
observations and feelings between people, to make people
"keep things to themselves" as a "social virtue that shows
'character' and 'judgment'."

That (really looking at people, and exchanging observations
made) IS BY DEFINITION offensive to Criminal Minds, and to
their supporters.

Giving in to their demand, however, and NOT LOOK at
Criminal Minds, or hiding your observations, causes maybe
the most damage to yourself and to the society.

2.g. Nobody is, regarding all areas and all people, free of
significant lies from others; and those lies that are
significant one will in some way fight for; and you will
thus initially oppose, and quite possibly feel offended by,
constructive - and educated, or informed or observing -
communications about it.

2.h. While destructive, un-educated and un-informed and
un-observing communications, may be ignored or simply
tolerated, and maybe to judge the originator of such,

that type of communication however, is NOT a Human Right,
and one can thus NOT claim, or demand or enforce such an
activity as "being one's Human Right" - or insist that
someone else must be allowed that as a "Human Right,"

also not in an Assembly, nor when some local or national
"law," or a tribal custom, demands it;

because it would be the demand, that "others must not care
about the intention (and in this case the destructive
intention) of a person's communication," or

that knowledge of the true intention of a person's
communication, "must not be acted upon."

2.i. A considerable number of social customs are designed and
enforced by Criminal Minds,

in order to prevent, to smother or to crush the very
necessary and vital exchange of constructive - and educated
or informed or observing - communications between people:

The most vital communications, including your most compel-
ling feelings and your most fundamental thoughts and your
emotionally strongest observations,

are PREVENTED or SMOTHERED or RIDICULED, by means of the
social customs that Criminal Minds have introduced into the
society, or inside a family or group, and that they enforce
in their area of influence.

2.j. You know this particular Human Right very well: the right
to talk in a constructive manner, with knowledge or obser-
vation, and regardless of the subject or of persons - it
feels very natural because it is anchored in your soul.

And you know equally, in your soul, that Criminal Minds
will REVERSE it:

to intend and bring about, that "you have NO right to
observe, or to talk about your observations to others;"

and on the other hand, they are insisting, that "they and
their 'friends,' DO have 'the right' to give FALSE data
and MALICIOUS viewpoints."

2.k. Criminal Minds will thus create, build up, and organize
opposition to this Human Right - they will enforce a
DENIAL of this Human Right - and they do so always by
painting 'an "outside" world' of "hostile people,"
of "opponents," who "therefore must NOT be informed,"
neither of constructive viewpoints, nor of truthful data:

Others "must NOT be informed correctly" - not correctly
about Criminal Minds, nor correctly about decent people -
"because people will use such knowledge against us,"

and instead "people SHOULD be informed falsely, to give
them the illusion of 'being informed', as the way 'govern'
them or 'handle' them."

2.l. Criminal Minds, for the same purpose, demand secrecy
agreements or secrecy laws to be abusively applied;

and similarly, they abuse emotional bonds, of friendship or
of a common profession, or of family, or of 'belonging to
the same religion,' to enforce secrecy.

2.m. And Criminal Minds go past merely demanding secrecy, and
devise and command activities that create and communicate
FALSE and MALICIOUS data, in order thus effectively to hide
or to negate (to deny, to oppose) truthful and constructive
data:
They oppose this Human Right BY demanding the creation of
false data, and by demanding THAT to be exchanged, "as a
Human Right of free speech."

'

ARTICLE TWO can therefore be summarized, as:

Everyone has the right, audibly or visually to communicate
constructively and in an educated, or informed or observing
way, to others and to the society, about any matter or person

- a Human Right, that will by its nature offend those groups
and those individuals, who wish, that others (and even they
themselves) are NOT educated or NOT well-informed or NOT
observing, in a constructive way, about some subject or
regarding some person (or also regarding themselves).

'

Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet

'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'

1 Kings 4:34

_______________
Background note:

The First Correct Human Rights Declaration (HRD),
is the result of all the work given to you
as the Human Rights Issues (HRI's) and
as Fine Particle Physics (FPP).

_________
Footnotes:

(may be added as the text indicates)

__________
References:

'First Correct Human Rights Declaration - ARTICLE ONE and
Preamble'
{HRD-01 20091223-V1.1}
(23 December 2009 - Version 1.1 on 25 Dec 2009)
for instance at:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/d4670b441b9bbf91

(more references as applicable)

____________
Verification:

      http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2010 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it (but not to sociopaths
specifically, because these vehemently oppose any true knowledge
of life and about themselves).
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific or artistic "agenda," but only to educate,
and to encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com


 
 
Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177559
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408937
Brugere : 218888

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste