"Knud Larsen" <mafishmaskela-snabela-yahoo.invalid> skrev i meddelelsen
news:00012065$0$2293$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Joakim wrote:
>
>> Mere end et år efter et israelsk flyangreb ordnede paragrafferne selv
>> tror FN's blinde og tandløse atomare vagthund nu endelig på, at der
>> muligvis har været et ulovligt atomanlæg i Syrien.
>>
>>
http://www.jv.dk/artikel/552184
>>
>> IAEA: Bombemål i Syrien lignede atomanlæg
>
>
> Muligvis? Ja, de har gravet tusinder at tons sand væk, og begravet det
> resterende af fabrikken i cement, - der er vist ikke noget muligvis
> muligt.
>
>
Mojn
Ordet muligvis var sarkastisk ment. Det er tydeligt for enhver at IAEA har
sovet i timen i forhold til Syrien, selv IAEA er klar over det, og derfor
tager IAEA naturligvis sine egne forbehold.
Bombemål i Syrien "lignede" atomanlæg osv.
Vi ser også en lignende tendens i forhold til Iran, hvor verdenssamfundet
som bekendt har spillet totalt fallit. I går kunne man f.eks. læse i nytimes
at Iran har beriget 630 kg uran, svarende til et styk a-bombe af
Nagasaki-styrke, men bare rolig får vi at vide, eksperterne er nemlig usikre
på, hvorvidt Iran er i stand til at bygge et a-våben.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
Iran Said to Have Nuclear Fuel for One Weapon
Several experts said that was enough for a bomb, but they cautioned that the
milestone was mostly symbolic, because Iran would have to take additional
steps. Not only would it have to breach its international agreements and
kick out the inspectors, but it would also have to further purify the fuel
and put it into a warhead design - a technical advance that Western experts
are unsure Iran has yet achieved.
"They clearly have enough material for a bomb," said Richard L. Garwin, a
top nuclear physicist who helped invent the hydrogen bomb and has advised
Washington for decades. "They know how to do the enrichment. Whether they
know how to design a bomb, well, that's another matter."