---

Er dette korrekt? At hele centralbanksystemet er på private hænder?

Quigley's bog er en ret så anerkendt...


------------------------------------------------

I am afraid that the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the
banks can and do create money... And they who control the credit of the
nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their
hands the destiny of the people
- Reginald McKenna speaking to stockholders as Chairman of the Board of
Midland Bank in January 1924.(1)

(Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, The
Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, p.325)





The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of
these investment bankers... who remained largely behind the scenes in their
own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international
co-operation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful
and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks... In
addition to these pragmatic goals, the powers of financial capitalism had
another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of
financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of
each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be
controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting
in concert, by secret agreements arrived at infrequent private meetings and
conferences. The apex of this system was to be the Bank for International
Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by
the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations...

(Quigley, op cit., pp. 324, 326-327)

---

Tja, hvad skal man sige? Her er ikke andet end kyllinger?

---

"Be Ka" <yahoo@yahoo.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
> Tja, hvad skal man sige? Her er ikke andet end kyllinger?
>
Velkommen til

- Merete

---

Be Ka <yahoo@yahoo.dk> wrote:

> Er dette korrekt? At hele centralbanksystemet er på private hænder?
>
> Quigley's bog er en ret så anerkendt...

i USA, ja. Søg på Wikipedia: "The Fed".

--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/

---

"Peter Bjørn Perlsø" wrote:
> Be Ka <yahoo@yahoo.dk> wrote:
>
>> Er dette korrekt? At hele centralbanksystemet er på private hænder?
>>
>> Quigley's bog er en ret så anerkendt...
>
> i USA, ja. Søg på Wikipedia: "The Fed".

Der står både det ene og det andet i samme paragraf. Men det korte og det
lange er at 'the fed' nyder godt af ordlyden 'The Fed' da det lyder
som et federalt organ, men egentlig er en helt igennem privat affære, ligsom
alle andre centralbanker (og ECB) også er det.

For at narre fjenden har vi bl.a. (In Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239
(9th Cir. 1982) "Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for
purposes of a Federal Torts Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned
and locally controlled corporations."
og
"the Reserve Banks have properly been held to be federal instrumentalities
for some purposes."

'held' by whom and for what 'purposes'? one may justly ask.

Ellers så er der en hel del informativt stoff i linksene nedenunder, både i
de eksterne og kritikken.

----------------------------------------------------------
of appearances there are four kinds
things either are as they appear to be
or they neither are, nor appear to be
or they are, but do not appear to be
or they are not but yet appear to be

---

"Be Ka" <yahoo@yahoo.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:43d20ef6$0$38715$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk...
> Er dette korrekt? At hele centralbanksystemet er på private hænder?

Gad ikke lige læse artiklen. Men Den Danske Nationalbank har tidligere været
et A/S (ejet af staten) og er idag en selvejende institution.

/morten

---

Morten S Hansen wrote:
> "Be Ka" <yahoo@yahoo.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:43d20ef6$0$38715$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk...
>> Er dette korrekt? At hele centralbanksystemet er på private hænder?
>
> Gad ikke lige læse artiklen. Men Den Danske Nationalbank har tidligere været
> et A/S (ejet af staten) og er idag en selvejende institution.

Hvorfor laver man den ændring? Mister staten ikke kontrollen?



JonB

---

"Jon Bendtsen" <noone@example.com> skrev
Mister staten ikke kontrollen?
>

Det er netop pointen - for at sikre en troværdig valuta må nationalbanken
være uafhængig af staten.

Ellers ville regeringer være fristet til at finasiere forbrug via
'seddelpressen' (med inflation til følge).

/morten