Hvis ikke driverne kører bedre end Nvidia's, så læg lige mærke til dette på
siden:
Let me warn you of something before you download:
THESE DRIVERS ARE SLOWER THAN NVIDIA ORIGINALS!!!
Why?
Because the where made with QUALITY in mind, not speed. The speed hit will
not be too high, from 1 to 8 FPS slower at most, but it could be higher in
cards with 32MB of RAM or less, haven't tested but it should since the
quality settings take a hit in FILL RATE, that's why it needs 64MB or more.
For those of you who don't mind about the hit you are welcome to try them, I
do care more about image quality than speed, since the nvidia cards are
powerfull I don't think anybody would mind if Quake 3 runs at 98FPS with
more quality than 104FPS with default quality.
These drivers where made as an "alternative" to anisotropic filtering, since
enabling aniso would cause a MAJOR drop in performance, but with these
drivers you WILL HAVE the same effect of aniso, but without the speed
penalty. Also, the textures look A LOT better when FSAA is enabled, not
blurred like before.
-m
"DWM" <no.valid.email.address@for.you.duh> wrote in message
news:3d286f2b$0$16828$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> "Chipmand" <chipmand@nospam.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:vejgiuc88kr9ap5d9eu53akltusgkdpc0j@4ax.com...
> > Det eneste jeg kan siger er at når jeg bruger den som er beskrevet
> > under systeminfo tidligere er den 4 kant der kommer frem ved at køre
> > ud af skærmen med de drivere i forhold til Nvidia 29.42 driverne.
> > Mit kort er et Gforce3 ti 200 128 mb.
>
> Prøv et ordenligt benchmark program og se hvad der så sker.
>
> /Kenneth Iversen
>
> How to Remove Linux and Install Windows 2000 or Windows NT:
>
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q247/8/04.asp
>