On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:21:37 +0100, spambuster@users.toughguy.net
(Jesper) wrote:
>steen hjortsoe <steenhjortsoe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Pondering on the biblical suggestion that the imminent nuclear war =
>> Doomsday will start in Jerusalem I asked myself: why don't they nuke
>> Tel Aviv instead ?
>>
>> Tel Aviv is an all-Jewish city, Jerusalem is not.
>>
>> The Answer I found is that nuclear weapons will probably only be
>> applied against Israel if the decision-makers consider they have a
>> reasonable chance of evading the MAD logic, i.e. if the nuclear
>> assault on Israel could be conceived so small and selective – kind of
>> fair retribution for the selective destruction of Beirut in the summer
>> of 2006 as it were – that Israel might hesitate to give an all-out
>> nuclear reply.
>>
>> So I expect that before long some state/non-state actor in the Middle-
>> East will attempt to detonate a small low-yield nuclear weapon in the
>> Jewish part of Jerusalem.
>>
>> Steen Hjortsoe
>
>Jeg tror den gamle hat er slidt om, du trænger til en ny:
>
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
og en til katten osse
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/tin_foil.jpg
--
If you want to make peace, you don't talk to your friends.
You talk to your enemies.
/Moshe Dayan/