/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
Sharia UK, II
Fra : Ukendt


Dato : 14-10-08 08:58

Denne er sendt tidligere i dag, men på min news dukker den ikke op, - så jeg
forsøger igen: - sendt to gange i går, men ikke dukket op.
Har lige testet med "test" - og et indlæg tog to timer om at komme op, men
det KOM da til sidst, så jeg prøver igen.
Håber ikke den ER kommet frem i går og at det kun er mig der ikke kan se
den.

Men det er jo et interessant emne, så jeg giver ikke op


Her er lidt nyt fra den engelske muslimske "samfunds-sammenhængsminister"
Khan:

Han siger jo det samme som jeg har sagt, - naturligvis


From The Sunday Times
October 12, 2008

Muslims rebuffed over sharia courts
Jonathan Oliver, Political Editor

Gordon Brown's new minister for race relations has attacked sharia courts,
insisting that the Muslim community in Britain is not “advanced” enough to
have its own legal system.

Sadiq Khan, whose comments will have added impact because he is a Muslim
himself, has also warned that the growing number of tribunals based on
Islamic codes could entrench discrimination against women.

Khan, who became minister for community cohesion in the government reshuffle
this month, said: “The burden is on those who want to open up these courts
to persuade us why they should do it.”

His comments contrast with those of figures such as Lord Phillips, the lord
chief justice, who said in July that Islamic law could be used to settle
marital and financial disputes

-------

Khan’s outspoken remarks on sharia courts are likely to cause the most
controversy.

The Sunday Times last month revealed that the government had quietly
sanctioned a network of sharia judges, empowering them to issue legally
binding rulings on disputes including finance, divorce, inheritance and
domestic violence.

Supporters of sharia courts point to the “beth din” courts long used by the
Jewish community to resolve family disputes. However, Khan said sharia
courts could not be compared with the beth din.

“I have seen good examples of Jewish courts,” he said. “I would be very
concerned about sharia courts applying in the UK. I don’t think there is
that level of sophistication that there is in Jewish law.

“Jewish law has a long history. There are not the same areas of concern that
there are with sharia law. At some stage in the future I do not rule out the
possibility that the Muslim diaspora in this country may be advanced enough.
But now is not the right time.”

Khan said he was aware such blunt criticism of his own community would lead
to controversy, but he insisted: “Mass migration [among Asian Muslims]
started 30 years ago. Jewish migration started 500 years ago.

“It sends the wrong message at a time when I am trying to say to all
citizens, ‘learn English, get involved in your community’.

“You should practise your faith, eat halal food, fast, have planning
permission for a mosque, be buried in the Islamic way, you can have your son
circumcised. What is the purpose – what is the loophole that sharia courts
are closing?”

Khan said he believed the tribunals would only exacerbate the unfair
treatment of Muslim women.

“There is unequal bargaining power between men and women in this country,”
he said. “Women can be abused and persuaded to do things that they shouldn’t
have to do.”

-------------

Men iflg CRL betyder det intet, at det nu har rettens blå stempel, - tjaa.




 
 
Bo Warming (14-10-2008)
Kommentar
Fra : Bo Warming


Dato : 14-10-08 13:05


"Knud Larsen" <mafishmaskela-snabela-yahoo.invalid> skrev i en meddelelse
news:00b854a4$0$9727$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

> Khan said he believed the tribunals would only exacerbate the unfair
> treatment of Muslim women.
>
> "There is unequal bargaining power between men and women in this country,"
> he said. "Women can be abused and persuaded to do things that they
> shouldn't
> have to do."

Samfundet er blevet for kompliceret så vi bør afvise at straffe for "abuse"
og andet åndeligt fnidder

Vold, mord, tyveri, voldtægt, økonomisk snyd, frihedsberøvelse - det er de
vigtige ting der skal straffes for og stort set kun dem

Hvis kvinder bliver "PERSUADED" til at gøre noget de ikke bør gøre, så er
det 100% deres egen fejl

THE UNEQUAL BARGAINING POWER er især til kvindens fordel



Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177557
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408868
Brugere : 218888

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste