steen hjortsø wrote:
> Discretion is normally considered a vital instinct for a secretary of
> defense. Thus asked about possible actions against Iran by the IDF,
> Mr. Barak replies: “the only thing we shouldn’t do is talk about it.”
>
>
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3539301,00.html
>
> But what is behind secretary Barak’s discretion in this case ? The
> dire truth is that prevention or at least postponement of the
> impending big war in the Middle East as desired by Mr. Barak is
> utterly convenient to the Israeli – and American – governments but
> certainly not to the Israeli people.
>
> As it appears from the excerpt below, the big one = Doomsday will, in
> principle, result in zero = 0 Israeli casualties, whereas one, two or
> three years of continued “testings” of Hizbollah and Hamas rockets
> would result in scores or hundreds if not thousands of casualties
> among the Israeli civilian population.
>
> I do not deny that the actions and omissions of the powerful Israeli
> government may be one of the factors which have an influence on, e.g.
> postponement of the exact date when Doomsday occurs, but, I repeat, a
> postponement is certainly not in the true interest of the Israeli
> people.
>
> For a detailed explanation of the above considerations, see the
> following excerpt from my book ‘After Doomsday: World War III and the
> Triple Revolution’ Copenhagen 2006:
>
> At the turn of the millennium it was the common opinion among
> political scientists that the era of revolution, at least in the
> heartland of advanced industrial democracies, was
> drawing to a close.
>
> Now, a mere half decade later, an entirely different picture, the
> contours of war and war’s well-known connection with revolution begin
> to loom large. There is no getting round the fact that we are still,
> in 2006, under the spell of the ever rising tension in the Middle East
> invariably reverberating around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
>
> Add to this the newest threat, the current insidious proliferation of
> nuclear arms in the
> Middle East and their means of delivery which we have reason to
> suspect submit to an
> anti-Western rancour more akin to religious fanaticism and even -
> state-sponsored -,
> terrorism than to political and military rationales similar to those
> of the Cold War.
>
> With these ominous developments and failing the cogent constraints of
> the confrontation between NATO and the now defunct Warsaw Pact, how on
> earth should
> we be able to cherish a reasonable hope of avoiding nuclear war in
> this rampant,
> intricate and glaringly asymmetric reality? The inevitable and obvious
> answer is: we
> can’t!
>
> Does this finally force us to deduce that our global civilization,
> comprised of a mere 5,000 years in comparison to the 4.569 billion
> years our planet has existed, was an ephemeral, flawed design doomed
> to certain ruin once the stage of nuclear arms
> was reached? Hardly, for that man is too tenacious, his intelligence
> too developed to
> cow once roused by the prospect of transcending Doomsday itself.
>
> As might be expected, deeply serious discussions of a possible
> survival of our
> civilization after a nuclear disaster started in the early 1960s at
> which time it finally
> dawned on those circles who were developing the nuclear means to
> realize a global
> atomic war, that the similarity between the prospective World War III
> and Doomsday as
> described in both the Bible and the Koran was so remarkable that
> closer scrutiny was
> required.
>
> The summoned physicists introduced the idea of a time reversal and
> time rereversal
> producing not one, but two stupefying messages:
>
> 1. a message of survival of our global civilization.
>
> 2. a message of the interference of – ’God’ – becoming an ETI
> (extraterrestrial
> intelligence) concurrently with the transformation of Doomsday to the
> more mundane but not less gruesome reality of World War III.
>
> The theoretical physicists realized that the use of nuclear arms in WW
> III would indeed
> ignite the atmosphere as feared by Edward Teller and Robert
> Oppenheimer when
> considering the use of the first atomic bomb.
>
> Ignition of the atmosphere did not occur in the isolated atomic
> bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it will happen with the huge
> release of energy from 10 or perhaps as many as 20 large nuclear and
> hydrogen bombs in and around the world’s megalopolises leading to a
> unique global homogeneous, and inconclusive, plasma
> state with a strong inherent tendency to come back to the starting
> point of the normal
> state, or in theoretical physical terms: a coherent global plasma
> state involving a time
> reversal and an ensuing time re-reversal negating the entire WW III
> and saving
> everybody’s lives.
>
> Considering one nuclear detonation in 1945, it was realized that the
> pressure in
> and around the fireball of a single detonating bomb would be too small
> to ignite the
> atmosphere, to say nothing of letting a possible ignition propagate
> through it. This
> barrier to propagation is eliminated, when simultaneous nuclear
> detonations are piled
> on top of each other like the plastic domes of ‘ludo pieces’ creating
> a massive localised
> pressure – and ignition of the atmosphere.
>
> When you then stack one pile of detonating nuclear ‘ludo pieces’
> beside another, then
> a third, a fourth and so on, a strong propagation vector is achieved
> and sustained and
> continuous ignition of the atmosphere ensured. Such ignition processes
> will actually
> encircle the planet on Doomsday emanating from many different ignition
> locations.
>
> From the beginning of the 1960s, it was realized in NSA and KGB
> circles that they had just deciphered the biblical message about
> Doomsday they were destined to penetrate the moment when their
> employers had become capable of staging a nuclear Doomsday and that
> Doomsday from that point on could never more be sidetracked to a
> difficultly comprehensible, apocalyptic séance of interest and
> credulity only to orthodox
> religious communities.
>
> Considering themselves a distinguished elite (’The Chosen’) in the
> habit of academics flattered to be invited to join the intelligence
> service – instead of realizing the inescapable devaluation of their
> position to the convenient tools of tyrants, on a par
> with the downgrading of ‘God’ to a mere ETI - it must have been
> essential for the self-image of these people that their privileged
> position enabled them to conjecture, based
> on the biblical text, that technical and theoretical physical
> possibilities would be
> available on Doomsday to present the entire global civilization to
> much more than a
> meaningless carnage, indeed to its eye-catching negation, the
> transcendence of
> sacrifice.
>
> The central axis passing through the Judaic-Christian civilization is
> identified as the progressive transcendence of sacrifice illustrated
> by the pseudosacrifices of Isaac, Jesus, and Messiah. Beyond the signs
> and wonders in the Revelation (of John of Patmos), the Revelation, the
> last book in the Bible, is a vision of Doomsday, the heavenly
> Jerusalem, and the pseudo-sacrifice of Messiah.
>
> Whereas the Cold War only lasted until 1991, the huge number of
> nuclear arms
> developed throughout four decades persisted for another decade and a
> half, although
> their use in 200?, the anticipated year of Doomsday, will definitively
> confirm their long
> suspected inapplicability in war revealing the quite different not to
> say paradoxical
> objective they were bound for: that of securing common survival.
>
Jeg synes du har vrøvl med leverancerne.
Du lovede allerede at levere dommedag for et par år siden.
Siden er leverancerne udeblevet
/F