---

Denmark for Danes?

The 5 mio citizens with Danish roots through generations, are the owners of
Jutland and the islands towards Sweeden.

Our forfathers have build up the splendid economy and we deserve the fruits
of their efforts

International law may give human and other rights to certain newcomers, but
this is far less important.

We, that continue the traditions and have spontaneous true loyalty to them,
should have special rights and privileges.

This group-egoistic point of view is not contradicting our benefiting from
globalization and EU-cooperation. These advantages are subject to marked
mechanisms and trade, and when we import East European labor, we have to pay
as agreed, but we have no other obligations.

The nationalism of earlier centuries had emphasis on defence, and patriotic
sacrifice, which cannot be expected from Moslems whose holy book demand
their supporting holy war against us.

East Europeans may be as loyal as Danes, even in a war situations, but today
money is king and soldiers are professional.

If foreigners here need support from our police og hospitals, the police
should fight crime and violence with little interest in whether the sufferer
is rich or poor, Danish or Foreign. Medical work, that may be postponed,
should be charged for, but emergency care should be free of charge or
payment postponed.

EU-rules must be followed - but in general the saying "Danmark for the
Danes" is not completely outdated. Privileges should be given to tourists
to the extent that their countries give Danish tourists in their countries
similar privileges. Especially when the persons belong to our culture and
the one of EU and , secondarily , USA and Japan.

India and China will soon be as rich as us, and should also be respected as
friends to some extent. But developing countries deliver persons that may be
looked much as animals, apart from protecting them against violence.

Group egoism is a good thing. We will be alienated if we do not respect the
families of mankind, such as that of EU, which is coming close to that of
Denmark.

---

"Bo Warming" <bwng@bwng.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:qWBfi.82$NV3.71@news.get2net.dk...

> The 5 mio citizens with Danish roots through generations, are
> the owners of Jutland and the islands towards Sweeden.

Ok, Jylland er noget Danmark "ejer" ? Det er ikke en egentlig del
af Danmark ?

> Our forfathers have build up the splendid economy and we deserve
> the fruits of their efforts
>
> International law may give human and other rights to certain
> newcomers, but this is far less important.

> We, that continue the traditions and have spontaneous true
> loyalty to them, should have special rights and privileges.

Du følger ingen traditioner. Du er på tværs af alt otg bestiller
ikke andet end at beklage dig over alle aspekter af dette
fantastiske land.

> EU-rules must be followed - but in general the saying "Danmark
> for the Danes" is not completely outdated. Privileges should be
> given to tourists to the extent that their countries give Danish
> tourists in their countries similar privileges. Especially when
> the persons belong to our culture and the one of EU and ,
> secondarily , USA and Japan.

Hvad er "our culture" ?

> India and China will soon be as rich as us, and should also be
> respected as friends to some extent.

Nøj hvor du lefler for de rige :)

> But developing countries deliver persons that may be looked much
> as animals, apart from protecting them against violence.

Dig og dit "vold". Du fatter virkelig ikke at vold mod krop ikke
er det allerværste.


--
/\ preben nielsen
\/\ prel@post.tele.dk