/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
(rev 1.3) The (actual) Secret: How to find~
Fra : Koos Nolst Trenite


Dato : 19-06-07 05:22

How to find out any secret of anyone, that is vital to your or others'
well-being to be known - 'Remote Knowing' as done by any sane person

16 June 2007
{FPP 20070616-V1.3}
{HRI 20070616-V1.3}

'

Criminal Minds of course teach you, that "this is not possible,"
though any manager does this twenty-four hours a day, to be able
to do his or her job at all,

to be able to care for you,

but the medical "profession" and medical "scientists,"
medical "researchers" and medical "journalists"

- all being very intensely insane* -

* provided you actually define the term correctly, *(1)
which however they - the medical Criminal Minds - define
wrongly as well, but

according to the ACTUAL Definition of Insane, they ARE highly
insane, and according to them,

it is "scientifically not possible" to know about and to
understand people.

Really...

'

A health insurance company - one of the best - writes to
its customers, that

doing sports in the morning, "grows new brain cells
so as not to be depressed."

Really... Very well-meaning, but utterly insane in its
"explanations."

'

'

So "it is not possible" according to what THEY claim to be "science,"

- actually it is their 'religion,' their CULT of "science,"
that claims, that Life Energy "does not exist" - *(2)(3)

(you might as well say, that "Life itself does not exist"

because there is hardly a more insane and more
un-scientific statement,

since French "scientist" Lavoisier, with American
Benjamin Franklin, made it "official law," in Paris,
the capital of France, that)

'Life Energy "does not exist",' a statement of "scientific" Insanity

on the order of saying that and then working with a
"science" that claims: "No water exists on Earth."

It follows, then, statistically seen,
that the most un-scientific or the most
'anti-scientific' individual

- from a purely statistical viewpoint,
of course -

would be a medical journalist or medical press
writer,

in particular one employed by the Amoral
Press or by the Associated Parrots (both
abbreviated 'AP') *(4)

topping the list of "scientific" Insanity (if
Insanity is defined correctly). *(1)

'

'

'

'

'Remote Knowing' is done,

as you do it all the time, every day, day and night,

- and the more responsible and intelligent you are,
the more you do it, of course -

by connecting to (and doing so with your Life Energy, of course, so
that you start to look at and become aware of) all possible answers,
scenarios, locations, times, memories, people involved or hidden,
etc.,

regarding something or someone you want to understand, and then you
are of course culling these to (sifting, choosing from all these)
the actual, applicable answer and understanding.

'

In Buddhism they do THE REVERSE of finding actual answers,

and they do so in order to END all responsibility and to END
all understanding, and to replace it with NO LIFE and with
their NO TRUTH

which they thus have to call "Noble 'Truths',"
(abbreviated 'No Truth') and which they also
call 'Dharma' (or 'Dhamma').

'

'

Connecting to all possible answers, scenarios, locations, times, etc.,
and culling these to obtain the actual answer(s), you do,

in case you want to find out about and understand very difficult
people and situations to penetrate (then you do so)

preferably with the assistance of a Life Energy Fluctuation
meter (see Introduction to Fine Particle Physics - Part ..)

- which you could carry around your wrist,

as you would have one anyway all the time at your wrist,
to assist your looking at what is going on in daily
life as you normally do look -

and also, if possible, preferred for very difficult tasks worth
spending that much time and effort on, you (then) do so with the
help of an administrator, a secretary or assistant,

who keeps you on track in looking exhaustively for and
at all possible answers and scenarios and persons that
could possibly be involved, and

who (the assistant or secretary then) records the possible
answers - and the fluctuations these produce on the device
at the moment the answer is considered by you.

'

'

'

However, as Criminal Minds have everything in reverse,
being Criminal Minds,

these will of course NOT obtain correct answers by this
procedure, and they will INTENTIONALLY NOT OBTAIN correct
answers, *(1)

and if they DO get SOME answers, then they will hide or
pervert the correct answers, or omit necessary parts of
the correct answers, or they will wrongly assign, who
causes what, etc..

They do it intentionally and compulsively wrong, and
they do so, in order to manipulate and mis-direct you
and others (and themselves of course).

Criminal Minds do give data, but never reliable
data.

Especially in those cases, you have constantly to verify,
with physical (photon and sound) observation and from
testimony and observations by other people, what is true
and what is not.

Criminal Minds in particular do lie about the
intentions of themselves and of others:

Even when, and though "the data is verifiably true,"
they STILL manage to reverse truth by lying about
the intentions that went with it.

YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO ASK FOR AND LOOK AT THE
INTENTIONS present. *(n)[First Law of HR]

'

The same applies, when you or another sane person looks AT
Criminal Minds, or does 'Remote Knowing' about a Criminal
Mind,

both in daily-life looking, as well as in
intensive 'Remote Knowing' looking, at a
Criminal Mind:

The Criminal Mind has layers of lies, and 'friendly'
or also repulsive masks, and has intentionally

false, fabricated "evidence" or "memories," and
projects false feelings - which are all Energies -
and he or she uses these as hypnotism against you,

to mis-direct and to hide that, what actually
happened and what was done by whom with what
intention (in other words, the truth),

and in order to prevent you from or make you
give up looking or make you feel satisfied
with the answers you have obtained,

much like in an Oprah Winfrey or Larry
King Live show, they never let you find
out the necessary truth, but give you a
feeling of having been 'satisfied.'
This pays them well.

'

'

'

As always, the definition of Sanity applies (defined as the ability,
desire and action also, of detecting and looking through deceptions).
*(5)

The saner a person is, the faster and the more accurately he or she
will find also well-hidden answers, with 'Remote Knowing.'

This is done in daily life exactly the same, by intelligent
people, where feeling-connecting is providing the highest
intelligence,

simply by looking at something or someone, while scanning,
feeling, connecting to, all possibilities and past data
available,

and this is done in a fraction of a second, normally, by
you or by any intelligent person, in daily life.

'

Again, a Criminal Mind has everything in reverse, so when THEY
do that, then THEY 'feel' the opposite:

When you are a nice and caring person,

then the Criminal Mind concludes, that "you are a
dangerous, threatening person who must be destroyed
in any possible way of deception and by means of
Energetic attacks." *(6)

'

'

'

Now if you HAVE found out some secrets of some people, then you will
find out, that you also have to raise your level of ethics to a
workable, somewhat civilized level, as I described it for instance

in 'Rights of Criminal Minds,' *(n) and

in the definition of 'respect.' *(n)

So you do not go for a kind of Hammurabi *(n) "Justice,"
or Islamic (Sharia) type "Ethics,"

which are simply barbarisms

and void of any ethics, based as these are on
NO UNDERSTANDING OF LIFE AND Of PEOPLE, AT ALL.

'

You find the maximum of insanity, though - in the
area of ethics and morals - extreme destructiveness,
in the Hindu, Buddhist and New Age lies "about
life:"

Their "solution" is, to simply deny and
ignore what is found out about people,
because 'Karma,' or what they call "The
Universe," "will take care of all."

'

'

'

So you do not choose such "spiritual" people as your secretary
or helpful administrator or as your listening partner,

BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TRUTH, they REVERSE TRUTH and
transform it into its opposite, which they call Dharma
or Dhamma (according to which dialect they prefer).

Let's say, you find out that 'your ex-wife was a
stealing, malicious whore in her preceding life time,'

and that is the reason, that she hated the loving
and beautiful 'sacks' you wanted to give her,

and it explains, why she only can be aroused by
ugly, treacherous 'sacks,' which you were neither
willing to give nor capable of giving.

'

Now, you know, they, the Buddhist-Hindu-New-
Age clan, those of "Love and Light," and of
"unconditional Friendship with all," THEY
don't care at all whether that is true or not,
or what is now ethical or not,

THEIR goal is to DESTROY any morals and ethics
and truth, and replace it with PRETENDED
"morals" and "truth," because

according to their Dharma, according to
THEIR "truth," "Beauty should feel like
Ugliness and Ugliness should feel like
Beauty"

- they, the Buddhists, to practice their
Dharma, have actual exercises for
feeling that, for feeling everything
in reverse,

and at the same time, they have
exercises for NOT feeling, for
"Being detached" -

THEY call that 'Dharma,' or "truth"

...how "Noble" a "Truth" indeed.

'

You ALSO do not choose, as an assistant, someone who is a
pacifist or "someone who has given up fighting"

as if evil and Criminals stop by themselves and are not evil
"as long as you do not 'provoke' them or stop them,"

which - not stopping them - is of course exploding your crime
rate, and leading to eternal war, as pointed out in the
Definition of Peace. *(7)

Pacifists and Cowards are NOT interested in truth:

They ARE interested in intelligent lies, to make
their destruction seem "good" and "moral." *(8)

'

'

'

'

I will give you an example, here, of a 'Remote Knowing' procedure:

Make a long list of what l. ron hubbard might be or could be or would
be hiding from you.

This could be in response to the question 'What might, could or would
l. ron hubbard hide most from you?'

Ideally, at each answer, you would write of course, how much
change and how fast a change (in your Energy) the answer
produces,

in your Life Energy that is acting on your chemical-
physical body of flesh and bones,

changes or fluctuations measured on a highly sensitive Life
Energy Fluctuation meter

(connected with tin-or-gold-covered iron plates - or
regular soup cans if you wish - at your hand palms or
other meridian Life Energy points, to measure your
body's very rapid fluctuations in electrical resistance,
due to the Life Energy fluctuations).

'

Then you read that list of answers again, and you cross out (omit,
drop) those answers, that do not trigger any Life Energy Fluctuation
at all - the result of assuming, that these would therefore not be
the most applicable answers. (See also below.)

'

'

The question is formulated so, that you are striving and CAN strive
into one direction, that of the most applicable, and therefore
assumed to be the correct answer or scenario, for one particular
answer.

You can't make the question too narrow, of course, like
'Did Lee Harvey Oswald murder John F. Kennedy?' There is no
room for looking at various scenarios and possibilities, there.

But 'Who wanted to have Kennedy assassinated?' or 'Who could
have prevented the assassination?' would be quite fruitful,
very workable questions.

Or more to the point, 'What was the intention of John F. Kennedy
towards people?'


This helps in the process of culling: Dropping more and more of the
list of possible answers. Each time as you cull the list of now
remaining possible answers, again and again, most answers will
produce less and less Life Energy FLUCTUATION, and many answers will
eventually drop out, not produce change anymore, because they do not
qualify as being 'the most,' as in

'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST from you?'

'

'

'

You will have to understand, that you find answers by connecting with
your Life Energy to those parts of life and to those individuals and
to those parts of your very vast but mostly hidden, "wiped out"
memory:

You are by considering the question, invited to connect your
Energy, and thus your Awareness, to those parts that have to do
with the subject, with the question,

'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST from you?'

'

You have to get used to that, that Awareness DOES WORK LIKE THAT,

(you have to get used to it again) because and when you are
taught, in school and at your parent's house, that

"You can not connect with your Energy to anything and
become aware of it," (which is a most idiotic statement
to make)

"unless you have been taught or told about, or unless you"

(have had a photon and sound proximity impression of
it) "unless you"

"have seen and heard," whatever it is,

that you connect to with your perceptional Life
Energy, so that you then visually see and audibly
hear and thus (are allowed to) know it.

'

'

In some cultures for instance, the children are not
supposed to be aware of what their parents do in the
parental bedroom, that resulted in their birth,

UNLESS they have had permission in the form of
(a photon and audio proximity experience of) seeing
and hearing what is done there by their parents.

In such a culture of hiding the basic things of life, you
would get rather strange "answers" to the question

'What did your parents enjoy most doing together?'

'

So you would have to re-formulate the question to 'What did
your parents enjoy most doing together, that you were allowed
to see?' or such, if you wanted to avoid the truth.

'

And back to the subject, 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard
hide MOST from you, that you - of course - were NOT allowed to see
or sense?'

Then any failure from a badly defined word 'hiding,' which some
people might interpret as meaning 'hide from eyesight or from
hearing it,' (sight and sound, and excluding ACTUAL perception to
Awareness) - that exclusion would be avoided by formulating it as
including 'What were you NOT allowed to see or hear or sense?'

'
You understand, that you DO need the Definition of Truth *(9)
for this, AND you will encounter - and reject as untrue - the
"Awareness" of people who 'create their own reality,'

their 'Negative Awareness' as I have called it,

their "total certainty, that, what they would like to be true,
'is what exists' and what they should enforce on others 'as
true' in order 'to make it be true',"

or what has been forced into their Awareness "as true" by means
of drugs, distorting, breaking or misaligning their Life Energy
(perception and feeling) connections to and from their body and
their environment.

'

The purpose of the whole procedure of 'Remote Knowing,' is, of course,
to get you, or someone else, in this case to actually start to look
at l. ron hubbard, and at what he did and does to people.

'

'

The procedure of 'Remote Knowing,' does not require any data seen or
heard, because you start connecting with your OWN Energy to what IS
there. *(10)

And basically you can apply the action to anything, that

you do not know about but HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT, for your
own or for others' well-being.

Just formulate a proper question and start to look at more and
more POSSIBLE answers to it, which gets you to connect with your
OWN Energy more and more, to what IS there.

It is helpful, of course, to have someone else asking and directing
your attention or connecting Energy

(by asking you the question, and by helping you to cull the list
more and more and by assisting you in recording the Life Energy
Fluctuations on the measuring device, to see which ones still
produce a fluctuation, and which ones do not anymore and thus
can be dropped from the list of possible answers, as you work
to narrow it down to probably one answer, as 'What is l. ron
hubbard hiding MOST').

And naturally you cross-check your data, and verify what you
got, with everything you can lay your hands or eyes on,

exactly as you do too in daily life, doing any available
cross-checking,

which will likely confirm and broaden the understanding gained
from your Remote Knowing.

'

'

'

You will be amazed, especially in the beginning, how much you are
capable of connecting to things, people, situations, locations,
and memories, that you thus can become aware of.

This is your natural, normal way of perception and knowing
in the first place.

But Criminal Minds have hammered it out of you and purged it
from "science."

'

And because l. ron hubbard severely DISTURBS and BLOCKS
Awareness-connection to the most vital 'things' to know
and to see and to understand in life - to people,
basically -

which he does by means of his Harmful Energies,
that are also echoed and amplified by others,
*(11)(12)

it is indicated, that the first question to be asked
(with all possible answers looked at) and then culled

(dropping more and more of the possible answers,
those that produce no Fluctuation or change anymore,
till you are left with the most likely true answer)

the first question then,

is: 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST
from you, that you - of course - were NOT allowed to see
or sense?'

'

'

Again: You will be amazed, especially in the beginning, how much you
are capable of CONNECTING to things - people, situations, locations,
and memories - that you thus can become aware of

- and, no matter how much the medical profession and its
"science" "for the benefit of Mankind" has destroyed
it and keeps destroying it, in you and others - *(13)

it is your natural ability and way of life in the first place. *(14)

In fact, I am doing that each time (but then so fast, that I do
not need nor want anything written down)

also when I use a Life Energy Fluctuation meter to find out
something that is very strongly hidden or camouflaged etc.,
but that I need to put my attention on, when

I need to find out something about others, for your well-being, as
always.

Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet

'God gave Solomon wisdom
and very great insight,
and a breadth of understanding
as measureless
as the sand on the seashore.'

1 Kings 4:29

_________
Footnotes:

(1) 'Definition Of Insane - Relation To Humor'
{HRI 20030205-V2.3.3}
(5 Feb 2003 - Version 2.3.3 on 13 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/83cdfa7c46d584d1

(2) 'American Constitution - Destroyed By Benjamin Franklin In 1787,
How' - Quote from {HRI 20021018-V2.0} 'The Mafia Code Against
Mankind'
(10 October 2003 quote, of Version 2.0 on 10 October 2003)

(3) 'Discovery of Life Energy - History in 1784'
(13 October 2003 quote from 'The Mafia Code Against Mankind,'
from {HRI 20021018-V2.0})
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.healing.reiki/msg/baf9af229e2bf21b

(4) 'On FRONT GROUPS - Intentional Sources of Insanity -
"Human Rights Watch," "Global Policy Forum,"
"Associated Press," etc.'
{HRI note 20070614-V1.1}
(14 June 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/84f4567a0d55af89

(5) 'Definition Of Sanity'
{HRI 20040410-V2.0.1}
(10 April 2004 - Version 2.0.1 on 12 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/767aa8ad19019afb

(6) 'On those who really FEEL "George 'Washington' Bush is evil, is a
devil" '
{HRI 20050527-V3.7.1-Q1-V1.1}
(7 June 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/a856f90d078b04f3

(7) 'Definition of Peace'
{HRI 20070520-V2.1.1}
(20 May 2007 - Version 2.1.1 on 28 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/5405ad9ec2d027a2

(8) 'Underneath the Mask of Michael Moore, A Sophisticated Psychopath
Lies'
{HRI 20040621-RI}
(21 June 2004 - Re-Issued 16 June 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.true-crime/msg/fe8f12b89e8a7037

(9) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}
(7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/bd379f557a773729

(10) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Certainty of Perception'
{HRI 20010829-pi11-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 11 Version 2.0 on 30 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/1d8d3f2a78ab95fe

(11) 'Defining The Major Harmful Or Bad Energies
- As They Are Created And Projected By Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030611}
(11 June 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/bcba5f8d8a8ef2de

(12) 'Defining 'Destructive Coward' (Definition)'
{HRI 20050610-V3.2.2}
(10 June 2005 - Version 3.2 on 9 Sep 2006)
(Version 3.2 (or 3.2.2) published on 17 (or 18) May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/4c3b304dfedd9f84
{HRI 20050610-V3.2.2.1} (published on 18 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/Koos-Nolst-Trenite/msg/f6117566a8d4bd84

(13) 'Medical Disorder series' - Parts 1-11
{HRI 20010829 ...}
(29 August 2001 - part Issues and Versions Sept-Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=%22Medical+Disorder+series%22+author%3ALeonardo

(14) 'How to find out any secret of anyone - 'Remote Knowing' as done
by any sane person'
{FPP note 20070616-V1.2}
(16 June 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/1b0bfeeafbf91566

(further as indicated)

__________
References:

(as applicable)

____________
Verification:

      http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com


 
 
Taureau Assis (19-06-2007)
Kommentar
Fra : Taureau Assis


Dato : 19-06-07 05:47

Koos Nolst Trenite a écrit :
> How to find out any secret of anyone, that is vital to your or others'
> well-being to be known - 'Remote Knowing' as done by any sane person
>
> 16 June 2007
> {FPP 20070616-V1.3}
> {HRI 20070616-V1.3}
>
> '
>
> Criminal Minds of course teach you, that "this is not possible,"
> though any manager does this twenty-four hours a day, to be able
> to do his or her job at all,
>


Ah ! non ! c'est un peu court, jeune homme !
On pouvait dire... Oh! Dieu!... bien des choses en somme.
En variant le ton,-par exemple, tenez:
Agressif: " Moi, Monsieur, si j'avais un tel nez,
Il faudrait sur-le-champ que je me l'amputasse ! "
Amical: " Mais il doit tremper dans votre tasse !
Pour boire, faites-vous fabriquer un hanap! "
Descriptif: " C'est un roc ! . .. c'est un pic ! . . . c'est un cap !
Que dis-je, c'est un cap ?. .. C'est une péninsule ! "
Curieux: " De quoi sert cette oblongue capsule ?
D'écritoire, Monsieur, ou de boite à ciseaux ? "
Gracieux: " Aimez-vous à ce point les oiseaux
Que paternellement vous vous préoccupâtes
De tendre ce perchoir à leurs petites pattes ? "
Truculent: " Ça, Monsieur, lorsque vous pétunez,
La vapeur du tabac vous sort-elle du nez
Sans qu'un voisin ne crie au feu de cheminée ? "
Prévenant: " Gardez-vous, votre tête entrainée
Par ce poids, de tomber en avant sur le sol ! "
Tendre: " Faites-lui faire un petit parasol
De peur que sa couleur au soleil ne se fane ! "
Pédant: " L'animal seul, Monsieur, qu'Aristophane
Appelle Hippocampelephantocamelos
Dût avoir sous le front tant de chair sur tant d'os ! "
Cavalier: " Quoi, I'ami, ce croc est à la mode ?
Pour pendre son chapeau, c'est vraiment très commode! " ,
Emphatique: " Aucun vent ne peut, nez magistral,
T'enrhumer tout entier, excepté le mistral ! "
Dramatique: " C'est la Mer Rouge quand il saigne ! "
Admiratif: " Pour un parfumeur, quelle enseigne ! "
Lyrique: " Est-ce une conque, êtes-vous un triton ? "
Naïf: " Ce monument, quand le visite-t-on ? "
Respectueux: " Souffrez, Monsieur, qu'on vous salue,
C'est là ce qui s'appelle avoir pignon sur rue! "
Campagnard: " He, arde ! C'est-y un nez ? Nanain !
C'est queuqu'navet géant ou ben queuqu'melon nain ! "
Militaire: " Pointez contre cavalerie ! "
Pratique: " Voulez-vous le mettre en loterie ?
Assurément, Monsieur, ce sera le gros lot! "
Enfin, parodiant Pyrame en un sanglot:
" Le voilà donc ce nez qui des traits de son maître
A détruit l'harmonie! Il en rougit, le traître! "
- Voilà ce qu'à peu près, mon cher, vous m'auriez dit
Si vous aviez un peu de lettres et d'esprit:
Mais d'esprit, ô le plus lamentable des êtres,
Vous n'en eûtes jamais un atome, et de lettres
Vous n'avez que les trois qui forment le mot: sot!
Eussiez-vous eu, d'ailleurs, I'invention qu'il faut
Pour pouvoir là, devant ces nobles galeries,
Me servir toutes ces folles plaisanteries,
Que vous n'en eussiez pas articulé le quart
De la moitié du commencement d'une, car
Je me les sers moi-même, avec assez de verve
Mais je ne permets pas qu'un autre me les serve.

DE GUICHE, voulant emmener le vicomte pétrifié.
Vicomte, laissez donc !

LE VICOMTE, suffoqué.
Ces grands airs arrogants !
Un hobereau qui... qui... n'a même pas de gants !
Et qui sort sans rubans, sans bouffettes, sans ganses !

Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177513
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408601
Brugere : 218887

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste