Koos Nolst Trenite, or "Cause Trinity" as they call him in English
language areas, who is arguably the most intelligent, beautiful,
caring and loving, and most truthful philosopher known, wrote:
On May 4, 7:03 am, Koos Nolst Trenite
On May 4, 7:03 am, Koos Nolst Trenite
<AmbassadorForMank...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The Nature of War
>
> 27 October 2005
> {HRI 20051027-V1.8}
>
> (Version 1.8
> on 4 May 2007)
>
> (Suitable for foreign
> language students)
>
> (View Summary
> by skipping
> indentation)
>
> '
>
> ' ... you are basically fighting enemies who
> are Criminal Minds, or people who are
> COMPELLED by Criminal Minds into being
> enemies too. {I-01}
>
> In other words: The only ones in a war,
> who are actually enemies, are those who
> are Criminal Minds, PLUS those who are
> COMPELLED by these (by a dictator, for
> instance) to ALSO "be enemies" for a
> while. {I-01-A}
>
> And so it has always been, and so it always
> will be, but none of the books on warfare
> mention it at all... {I-02}
>
> Yet that is THE strategy by which you have
> to fight any war, because THAT IS the nature
> of war.' {I-03} (*)
>
> '
>
> Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
> Human Rights Philosopher and Poet
>
> 'King Solomon was greater
> in riches and wisdom
> than all the other kings
> of the earth.'
>
> 2 Chronicles 9:22
>
> _________
> Textnotes:
>
> (As always in the HRI's - the more
> indentation, the more detail you get,
> and the less indentation you include,
> the more you will have a summary.)
>
> (a) Now, for the first time, you have a correct definition
> of 'enemy' (see above)
>
> and when you get the feeling of the correct definition,
> again
>
> - which you natively have, it is your native
> definition of what an enemy is -
>
> then it is again easy for you, to counter the deception,
> that makes you focus on the WRONG "enemy," or that makes
> you focus wrongly on the enemy, on
>
> what the enemy wants you to "see" as "the enemy,"
> NOT its native definition, but
>
> what the deception "defines" as "enemy."
>
> If you want an example, then look at North
> Korea, that has WRONGLY-"defined"-enemy
> 'plastered' all over it - and thus the
> politicians of its neighboring South Korea
> CAN NOT, and the politicians of China DO NOT
> want to handle North Korea.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Part of any warfare, is the enemy deceiving people.
>
> And as you know very well (and which the definition
> above, confirms) the enemy ALSO deceives people by
> falsely defining 'enemy' and 'enemies.'
>
> And enemies exert all their intelligence and efforts toward
> making people NOT see or feel who the Criminal Minds are
>
> - as you see it for instance now done by someone
> trying to build an image of "being not (anymore)
> a Criminal Mind,"
>
> done by currently the most dangerous Criminal Mind
> alive, Hu Jintao, already in Tibet a proven war-
> criminal, who is dominating the Chinese -
>
> and not enough with that:
>
> '
>
> Enemies ALSO make a tremendous amount of trouble
> exactly BY hiding this from you and from anyone,
>
> HOW Criminal Minds compel usually normal and
> friendly people, into being enemies too, *(9)
>
> so that you can't figure out, why someone
>
> - who used to be friendly and supportive to
> you and to everyone -
>
> suddenly feels it "necessary," to be mean and destructive
> to you and to have your life dominated or even destroyed.
>
> '
>
> Now THAT is making a tremendous amount of trouble and
> instability and insecurity.
>
> In the example of Hu Jintao, with his continuous
> barrage of lies about everyone and everything, and
> about himself in particular,
>
> he makes people (and that includes journalists)
> NOT SEE HOW he, Hu Jintao, manages to force
> Chinese people
>
> (and Canadian people [when he had a state-visit
> there] and people of Palestine [by supporting
> vicious Criminals "leading" Palestine] and
> Cuban people, and Zimbabwan (African) people,
> and Korean people, and Vietnamese people, and
> people of Brazil, and so on and on)
>
> be very mean and ugly and lying and destructive to
> each other.
>
> This he, Hu Jintao, being a Criminal Mind and
> thus reversing all truth, calls "maintaining
> stability." ....Really.
>
> And he lies so forcefully and so outrageously
> (it is too unbelievable, that someone would
> reverse truth that strongly - but any Criminal
> Mind does) so, that nobody even notices it,
> and certainly journalists do not. *(1)
>
> '
>
> That deception results in a continuous stream of false
> data coming at you and at others, also at your government
> people,
>
> in particular indeed from journalists - they just
> relay the deception, as you see, read and hear it
> daily.
>
> Part of the deception is, that journalists pretend
> to do actual reporting -
>
> they are reporting so, that you THINK you
> have relevant, or the important data,
>
> data that are obviously "true" - in our
> example, journalists really DO relay,
> very truly, the lies that Hu Jintao
> gives in public or issues to the
> public - *(1)
>
> while many of these data are such outright lies,
> that you can not even recognize them. *(11)
>
> '
>
> "Cuba And Venezuela Hate America For
> Its Imperialist Views" - which is an
> outright lie in EACH word of it, and
> which the journalists are NOT reporting
> as
>
> (but would - supposing they dared
> for long enough to bypass any of
> their professional compulsions
> that forbid it - have to report
> as)
>
> "I am now going to report a vicious and
> very destructive lie to you,
>
> that is aimed at destroying the
> living conditions of many people,
> and at wasting a tremendous
> amount of their possessions and
> time;
>
> a lie with the purpose to violate The
> First International Law, *(21) violating
> it by intending to keep two extremely
> destructive, severely Criminal Minds
> in a position of government,
>
> where they can and will do, and
> have already done maximum
> destruction to people,
>
> which you know has been and is
> being done to people by
>
> Castro and Chavez:
>
> 'Cuba And Venezuela Hate America
> For Its Imperialist Views'."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Part of any WARFARE IS THE ENEMY DECEIVING PEOPLE, in such a
> way, that you will not choose the correct remedies and will
> not find the right strategy:
>
> OF COURSE they do try to deceive you - so that you
> will lose; or, not win.
>
> And they have of course to relay that deception to you,
> and nowadays, this is mostly done by journalists,
>
> a species with the biological classification
>
> "parrotus journalisticus."
>
> '
>
> When you know these things, then you are able to read a
> newspaper, or see other news media
>
> - and gain some understanding of what is going on. *(7)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (b) We continue to further comment on and increase your practical
> understanding of this Human Rights Issue:
>
> Then you have ENTIRE RELIGIONS AND PHILOSOPHIES, that have
> been promoted on Earth
>
> in order to PREVENT people from recognizing - or to make
> people not even look for - Criminal Minds,
>
> '
>
> '
> such as Hinduism and Buddhism - and its modern
> off-shoots, such as the New Age movement and the
> various gurus or Holinesses that have blown partly or
> wholly over to the West, or South of the Himalayas
>
> - all of whom abound in "love" and "friendliness" -
>
> in our example, being cowardly "friendly" to
> the very murderer and torturer of his own
> people, the Tibetans,
>
> by completely denying the character and the
> intentions and the past deeds of China's
> Hu Jintao,
>
> while the Tibetan "Dalai Lama 'has remarked
> several times in the past, that he would like
> to see China's President Hu as someone [who
> is] much more easy to engage [to talk with],
> because of his [Hu Jintao's] personal
> knowledge of Tibet"
>
> - first this 'Dalai Lama' (by passport
> called Tenzing Gyatso) REFUSES to
> face, to look at, to see,
>
> (even while he is sitting bodily
> in front of him)
>
> the Criminal Mind Mao, the Chinese
> dictator who ordered Tibet destroyed,
>
> and then, 'Dalai Lama' born Tenzing
> Gyatso refuses to face the very
> Criminal Mind, Hu Jintao, WHO
> EXECUTED THOSE ORDERS TO DESTROY THE
> TIBETANS -
>
> which is indeed "President Hu's 'personal
> knowledge' of Tibet."
>
> '
>
> Really...
>
> euphorically and "lovingly" denying and
> ignoring the war crimes and the intentions
> and the nature first of Mao and then of
> Hu Jintao, and of any Criminal Mind,
>
> and all he can do, is sheepishly
> laugh it away, so people will not
> look at him, at who he was and is
> actually, this 'Dalai Lama,'
>
> as indeed the Buddhist philosophy dictates
>
> to the one who claims currently to be
> the soul of the Great Lama incarnate,
> while however the Buddhist philosophy
> dictates,
>
> that "one has no individuality really," and
>
> as indeed he preaches to others
>
> - BUT an actually great soul, like the
> one who was indeed the 'Dalai,' the
> Great Lama, would never want to be a
> Buddhist
>
> and would never agree - to
>
> being in abundant, euphoric and even exuberant
> "love" with a barely camouflaged Hate of Life:
>
> That is, actively working towards the
> goal of abandoning and denying life, AND
> towards denying the existence and the
> individuality of people,
>
> yes, denying the very tenets of Lamaism
> (of the Tibetan 'Bon Po' religion) itself,
> even denying the existence of The Creation:
>
> That indeed produces - as you easily can test
> yourself, and as various gurus prescribe it -
>
> a total euphoria, an exhilaration, an exuberance,
> a bliss, a 'samadhi' as they call it, a very simple
> immersion in the Energy of Euphoria,
>
> "nothing and no one to be responsible for,"
> "no drive towards enjoying anything, nor to
> make anyone else enjoy life;" and so
>
> "nothing can hurt you anymore;" and they
> tell you with great conviction, which they
> indeed experience, that "they are thus
> 'invincible',"
>
> in what YOU experience coming from them as a wholly
> repulsive euphoria, an enforced, very ugly lack of
> connection to life, a blindness and selfishness,
> the maximum possible, of 'ego,'
>
> which indeed requires them to have and to use the
> appropriate set of very intelligent lies "about
> life," and, OF COURSE
>
> a strict DENIAL of the existence of Criminal Minds,
>
> and that, with an exuberant, Hinduistic PRETENSE of
> "knowing about life,"
>
> '
>
> which is only a stone's throw from other organizations
> such as those, whose staff SHOULD name and SHOULD face,
> but that REFUSES to name and REFUSES to face Criminal
> Minds,
>
> '
>
> '
>
> such as "Peace"(!) movements, including Green Peace,
> Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and most
> United Nations programs too,
>
> all claiming to be full of Humanitarian Aid and
> Care, full of Care for Health and Education, and
> full of Protection of and Development for people,
> (really!)
>
> the actual activity of which is however
>
> - by successfully diverting people's attention
> to "the important things" -
>
> to PREVENT(!) people from seeing Criminal Minds.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> That is hard to imagine, but that is how it is
> now,
>
> thanks to the Criminal Minds - including
> the American Benjamin Franklin - who preach
>
> "we are all equal,"
>
> in other words, "Criminal Minds do not exist,"
>
> or in still other words "everyone has or is a
> Criminal Mind,"
>
> words they use, with the purpose
>
> to DENY the existence of Criminal Minds.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> And so these Organizations will (and indeed do) perpetuate
> suffering and trouble and instability forever
>
> - obviously and provenly. *(2)(4)
>
> Ask the people in Myanmar, in North Korea, in Iraq,
> in China, in Ethiopia, in Vietnam, in Libya, in
> Cuba, in Syria, in Africa, in Belarus, in Iran,
> in Zimbabwe, in Ethiopia ...and so on and on.
>
> You really should be ashamed of yourself.
>
> "You have to have a Criminal Mind as head of
> state,
>
> 'in order to create and maintain stability'."
>
> Really, now...
>
> "China should send a manned mission to the
> moon" - for the greater glory of Hu Jintao,
>
> so that he can more easily suppress and
> dominate the people who happen to be Chinese.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The mentioned or implied Humanitarian Organizations ALL comply
> with the Criminal Minds
>
> who demand that it is "bad taste" or "hurting the
> credibility of the Organizations," etc. etc.
>
> to point out Criminal Minds, because "that is personal."
>
> '
>
> The American President "should ONLY care for the
> well-being of Americans," and "not for the well-
> being of other people."
>
> In plain text: "Criminals must be left alone
> to do whatever these please to do to people
> in Myanmar, in China, in Cuba, and so on."
>
> In plainer text: "Murder and torture and
> domination and theft is 'an internal affair'
> or just 'another political system'."
>
> Really...
>
> '
>
> And journalists report about these Humanitarian Organizations
> as if these are "impersonal institutions"
>
> (as in "the court decides," "the government has
> determined," and so on, which is missing
>
> "Who decided, who thought, who concluded, who
> determined?")
>
> "Amnesty International said," "the WHO (World Health
> Organization) considers," "the United Nations
> Organization believes," and so on.
>
> '
>
> But those activities are run by and headed by INDIVIDUALS,
>
> which is of course very "personal" to mention,
>
> and which Mandela (South Africa's Human Rights
> hero) did not point out to you either, with his
> blind belief in "the United Nations Organization,"
>
> NOT mentioning that "the United Nations"
> consists of INDIVIDUALS,
>
> and that those individuals for a considerable
> part are Criminals or representing Criminal
> heads of state
>
> who BY DEFINITION have no care
> whatsoever for the well-being of
> people, no matter WHAT they say to
> the contrary - while forming the United
> Nations Organization
>
> "which needs to give approval on how one can care
> for the people of Iraq."
>
> '
>
> The EXISTING APPROVAL was, to have
> various countries and people profit
> with large amounts of money, mostly
> done secretly:
>
> Profit from the Iraqi people
> continuing to be destroyed,
>
> by means of a very obvious, and very
> forcefully Criminal Mind as head of
> state.
>
> '
>
> Probably ONE THIRD of the heads of state
> comprising the United Nations,
>
> ARE QUITE, and MANY HEADS OF STATE ARE
> TOTALLY, FULLY, PERMANENTLY, MALICIOUSLY,
> ACTIVELY CRIMINAL IN MIND AND DEEDS AND
> MOTIVES.
>
> BUT the non-criminal heads of state are
> NOT labeling those one third, as Criminal
> individuals, or as maliciously Criminal
> Psychopaths.
>
> Instead, the REVERSE is done, in their
> pathetic assemblies...
>
> Notwithstanding, everyone, also there,
> DOES KNOW:
>
> By definition, a malicious, Criminal
> Psychopath has no right whatsoever (to
> vote) to make decisions that affect others,
>
> and mere Criminals (Destructive Cowards) have
> only limited, conditional rights to do so.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Further, the individuals running the Humanitarian Organizations
> will - and indeed do - perpetuate the very PERSONAL suffering
> and trouble of people
>
> forever and everywhere
>
> by REFUSING (like the journalists themselves refusing also) to
> name any Criminal Minds. *(2)(4)
>
> '
>
> THEY call that "being polite and civilized," (while they
> know themselves very well, that it is merely cowardice
> and cowardice only *(9), and so indeed)
>
> I call it 'being extremely rude and highly
> in-considerate,' inimical actually, a criminal
> act,
>
> if someone would do that (omit that information) to
> me or to others.
>
> '
>
> And as you see, these "polite and civilized" people
>
> - including the Criminal Mind Madeleine
> Albright, formerly in charge of America's
> foreign affairs, and
>
> including the Destructive Coward Jimmy
> Carter, formerly president of America -
>
> they now caved George Bush in so much, that
>
> he must agree, that "it hurts America" to point out
> Criminal Minds, really...
>
> "because heads of state, even though they
> are Criminal Minds, are 'representing'
> people," and *(9)
>
> they had to find SOMETHING that appealed to the good
> intentions of George Bush:
>
> "'The Americans' expect of their president
> to be polite," they made him use, now.
>
> '
>
> A Criminal Mind, who claims to be "representing the
> people," must not be offended
>
> - indeed this used to be a capital offense,
> in Europe and elsewhere, and George still
> remembers that rather painfully, I would
> think.
>
> That is a typical "defense" by Criminal Minds:
>
> "If you hurt them, then you hurt
> 'the people'."
>
> Another typical "defense" by them:
>
> "If you don't love them, then 'you
> do not love people'."
>
> '
>
> I call it very far from being "polite and
> civilized," but instead, I call it
>
> 'being extremely rude and highly in-considerate,'
> inimical actually, constituting a criminal act,
>
> NOT to point out and name, to me and others
> - to anyone - a Criminal Mind that you know
> is a Criminal Mind, and
>
> NOT to address a Criminal Mind as what he is
> and wants - which IS respect.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Seeing and addressing people as these actually are, is the very
> thing that not only I, but that
>
> ALL decent people expect from any leader, especially from
> a president, and most certainly from the American
> president.
>
> People the world all over, of course expected it
> from the head of the United Nations Organization,
>
> but people have given up all hopes by now, seeing
> that 'the Secretary General' was elected and is
> being proposed exactly for NOT interfering with
> Criminal heads of state, and for doing as expected
> of him, which is to artfully PRETEND to the public,
> that "The United Nations Organization 'acts for the
> good of all people only'."
>
> Really...
>
> '
>
> '
>
> OF COURSE Criminal Minds - including the currently most
> obvious Criminal Minds who are heads of a state - start
> screaming, if you point them out and oppose their harm
> and their continuous and heavy criminality.
>
> Malicious individuals ARE malicious, and even
> much more effectively malicious of course as
> heads of state, but this applies also on a
> personal level.
>
> '
>
> And if you do NOT point their intentions
> and activities out - to me, or to others -
> then you are definitely NOT my friend or
> the friend of others, isn't it,
>
> but then you rather are an enemy who wants
> me and others to get hurt.
>
> That is not changed by you calling
> your behavior "diplomatic" or
> "civilized" or "maintaining stability,"
>
> as the Criminal Minds compel you
> to think it is, in order
>
> to hide and make your cowardice seem
> "normal," or "socially beneficial,"
> even.
>
> '
>
> I call it 'being extremely rude and highly
> in-considerate,' inimical actually, a
> criminal act, as
>
> obviously your cowardice is hurting others,
>
> is letting people run bare feet into
> the 'land mine' that any Criminal Mind
> actually is,
>
> and it is your continuously betraying others
> as well - that is, for as long as the others
> continue to trust you, and to give you support
> and love -
>
> till they discover that you are a
> traitor indeed.
>
> This understanding then defines
> betrayal and treason in any other
> area as well.
>
> '
>
> A tremendous, tremendous amount of trouble
> and sorrow and losses would have been saved
> me, if people who did see Criminal Minds that
> I did not see, had simply told me that.
>
> THAT - informing me of existing
> dangers - is what I expect of a friend
>
> ...of course, isn't it. *(12)
>
> Unless he or she is using those very
> repulsive, and nauseatingly malicious
> lies that you find as basic doctrine of
> Buddhism and Hinduism, hiding cowardice
>
> with "evil is necessary," and
> "Criminal Minds must remain
> hidden..." *(13)
>
> while meditating to restore his or her
> euphoria after betraying you and others,
>
> thus creating the euphoria to feel,
> that "one understands all of Life"
> *(14)
>
> ...simply by sitting long enough
> under "Four Noble Fig Trees."
> *(15)
>
> Really...
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (c) We have not finished yet:
>
> Then you have A WHOLE SCIENCE devoted to making people not
> see Criminal Minds, and
>
> that is the medical science, which are both the Western and
> the Eastern medical sciences. *(2)(4)(5)
>
> I have described that extensively in those Human Rights
> Issues referred to.
>
> '
>
> In short, the activity of medical "science" is, to prevent you
> from seeing, recognizing, or even looking for Criminal Minds,
> and for what these do Energetically,
>
> and thus they make you forever needing medical insurance and
> care.
>
> This is entirely beyond belief, unless you understand it.
>
> Again, my true and long time friend - supposing you look
> at the soul of a person rather than at his present life
> body - George Bush, does not understand it either, he
> does not face the nature of the medical trade, as you
> have seen him fail to sanely address the drug and
> medical industry, also AFTER he got (re-)elected.
>
> That is a kind of loyalty, that one should not accord
> to Criminal Minds and not to destructive organizations
> (the medical organizations and drug companies), even
> though these gave large sums of money
>
> ...to remain undetected, and to keep the aura of
> being "humanitarian" and of "relieving the suffering
> of people." *(2)(4)(5)(10)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (d) And then you have those who PRETEND to detect and to uncover
> Criminal Minds:
>
> That is what the 'Conspiracy'-theory people do.
>
> '
>
> To keep their activities going, they use the truth, that
>
> indeed, Criminal Minds do deceive on a large scale,
> they do indeed hide the cause
>
> of the troubles that everyone sees and that
> everyone is subjected to.
>
> '
>
> These 'investigators' of Conspiracies, then try to find
> often the most unlikely plots and connections,
>
> and they use - or they invent - very, VERY WILD "data,"
>
> a morass
>
> - much like the occult and the esoteric people have
> swamped the more curious persons with and into,
>
> not far removed from those, who go by (who use)
> VERY WILD "data" wrapped in "Cosmic Laws," brought
> to Earth
>
> by extra-terrestrials, or by "spiritual beings"
> even less willing to be identified and to show
> themselves in public, all of *(8)
>
> which I strongly suggest you do not go into
>
> - unless you do firmly know, that almost all
> data and experiences given in those subjects,
>
> including ALL the Hindu and Buddhist texts,
> as well as the Egyptian and Tibetan texts,
>
> most of which are the basis of the "secret"
> texts of the "occult,"
>
> have indeed the purpose to hide Criminal
> Minds -
>
> a path which of course you should not go into and
> follow, nor waste your time studying,
>
> UNLESS you can detect and classify the "data" they give *(8)
>
> as THEIR way of making you and others NOT face Criminal
> Minds, to make you not find, not detect, and not see or
> feel Criminal Minds, not even look for Criminal Minds,
>
> but instead, "to Love Criminal Minds" (to your death, and
> beyond your death giving them your Energy too),
>
> and that, of course, "unconditionally," as it is "decreed
> by 'Cosmic Law'."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The faithful reader knows, however, that you should
> never Hate anybody, also not Criminal Minds,
>
> but you certainly must not give them your Love
> Energy,
>
> because Criminal Minds will alter Love Energy,
> and use it only to destroy you more cleverly,
> and more forcefully, and they only use it i
> such a way as
>
> to destroy more of others' life as well.
>
> '
>
> Loving others is feeling or knowing the actual,
> real, true nature of someone,
>
> which nature can be, that he or she is a
> Criminal Mind, or is a Destructive Coward
> wanting to be dominated by a Criminal
> Mind,
>
> and you can feel or know that nature or
> condition of someone, and loving means
>
> acting accordingly. This I have described in the
> Definition of Friendship. *(16)
>
> '
>
> Further, Loving IS truthful perception, and thus it
> includes correct and true perception of a person's
> Hate and Lies
>
> - maybe expressed to you, or maybe not
> expressed to you.
>
> This I have describe in 'Defining Love And
> Hate - A Law Of Life'. *(17)
>
> '
>
> Thus, Loving IS knowing the condition of a person,
> by feeling it or knowing it,
>
> and then act accordingly - which action to take or
> not to take, depends largely on the circumstances.
>
> But the main action is feeling-knowing the
> condition, the actual truth about someone.
>
> '
>
> Thus, Criminal Minds very actively and very
> successfully DESTROY your Love for them, BY
> hiding their true condition, BY hiding their
> true nature from you.
>
> And they say - and you think - that it
> is exactly the opposite:
>
> THEY say (and demand), that NOT LOOKING
> AT THEIR TRUE NATURE "is Loving them,"
> "is truly Loving them."
>
> '
>
> And that is what Criminal Minds demand
> of each other too. *(18)
>
> And that is what the "Dalai" Lama
> demands of you, a euphoric "Love"
> of and "kindness" for people, for
>
> people also, who so very intensely
> but covertly Hate life, that they
> want to end it forever and for
> everyone, and
>
> who have made it their "religion"
> or 'path for everyone to follow'
> "in order to end suffering."
>
> "Life is suffering," THE lie
> of lies.
>
> Really...
>
> But that is exactly the opposite of
> Love.
>
> Criminal Minds have everything in
> reverse.
>
> '
>
> A successful way by which they destroy your
> Love, is by them, Criminal Minds,
>
> pretending to respect you,
>
> pretending to love you,
>
> making you believe, that you have
> helped them to become normal:
>
> '
>
> Thus they - very successfully - DESTROY
> your knowing or feeling their true
> condition, and
>
> THAT DISABLES your loving them.
>
> And it has further the result, in
> practice, that your perceiving
> others truthfully, which IS Love,
> is ALSO (greatly) impaired.
>
> In that way, Criminal Minds
> achieve a double purpose:
>
> To disable your Love for
> them, AND to disable your
> Love for others, and to
> have it replaced by a
> PRETENSE.
>
> '
>
> Contrary to what Criminal Minds
> say,
>
> Love does require, and actually IS
>
> true perception and thus true
> appreciation, which is true Love
> of someone, of someone's soul
>
> - a person is his soul, or
> 'his eyes' as some poets
> say.
>
> '
>
> That is a VERY, VERY important
> reason and necessity for you
> to learn about the nature of and
> how to recognize Criminal Minds.
>
> Which you can learn - or, your
> native but destroyed knowledge
> of which, you can have refreshed
> and confirmed now - with the Human
> Rights Issues.
>
> '
>
> My giving my Love to people IS my looking
> at or feeling the soul of others, and IS
> perceiving the true nature and condition of
> someone.
>
> This is tremendously loved and appreciated
> by people, *(19)
>
> because THAT - seeing and feeling
> their soul, how they are - RESULTS IN
> TREMENDOUS LOVE FOR PEOPLE.
>
> And Criminal Minds try to DESTROY that,
> by hiding - in very, very intelligent
> ways, including Buddhism and Hinduism -
>
> they are hiding very intelligently
> the true nature and the true,
> actual, present condition of
> people, of souls,
>
> the nature of you, of very good, of
> relatively undamaged souls,
>
> AND they hide - in the same breath - the
> nature and condition of very, very
> damaged souls too, of themselves also,
>
> damaged so violently, so viciously
>
> as to be very far beyond
> what you are allowed to
> imagine was done to them,
> to their souls,
>
> all the data, and
> all understanding
> of which, any and all
> Gurus ("spiritual
> teachers") COMPLETELY
> deny or hide, what
> was done,
>
> that resulted in them having
> permanently and irreparably
> become Criminal Minds.
> *(20)
>
> '
>
> Criminal Minds are individuals that comprise about one
> percent of the population of Earth - regardless of race,
> gender, age, social status, education, profession or
> religion - and
>
> they can be found even in your own family - conspiring
> certainly against you and against anyone, and doing so
> at all times, and in any matter - but certainly not as a
> "secret organization," and actually right under your very
> own nose. *(3)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (e) Criminal Minds prevent you from knowing The Nature of War.
>
> Naturally they do not want you to know the Nature of War, and
> they want you to "know" it wrongly:
>
> So they can win more easily.
>
> '
>
> The Nature of War is hidden BY Criminal Minds,
>
> such as by Von Clausewitz, by Sun Tsu (Sun Tzu), by
> Machiavelli, by Henry Kissinger,
>
> and of course by the Criminal Minds mentioned in 'Famous
> European ... ', *(6)
>
> and the way they hide it, is
>
> by means of "defining" 'War' FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF A CRIMINAL
> MIND, or, how a Criminal Mind would like you to "understand
> war"
>
> - so that, seen from a slightly higher viewpoint, it will
> become obvious, that you will lose always,
>
> because you will only at times defeat an opponent,
> and only sometimes "gain a victory,"
>
> where "winning" is the objective, like in the
> Eastern martial arts
>
> (however, the founder and expert of Aikido,
> does correctly discourage competition in it,
> as he saw, that it, competition, spoils the
> character of his pupils)
>
> or with the medieval knights of Europe, and there
>
> where "life consists of improving weaponry and
> fighting skills all the time, in order to be able
> to defeat possible opponents."
>
> '
>
> But with that "understanding"
>
> - which is PREVENTING you from understanding who are
> enemies, and from what IS the Nature of War -
>
> you will never defeat war. *(3)
>
> '
>
> The Nature of War not understood by you, you did or
> would support the Russian Criminal Mind Joseph
> Stalin,
>
> in order to defeat the German 'Hitlerian'
> monstrosity at that time,
>
> which gave you a "victory"
>
> that started another forty years of very,
> very costly 'cold' war,
>
> bringing a tremendous amount of suffering to
> all people enclosed in the Stalinist
> dictatorial 'Iron Curtain;'
>
> and the same applied or would apply
>
> - equally in violation of the Nature of War -
>
> to your supporting Iraq's Saddam Hussein in order
> to gain a "victory" over Iran's Islamic (Muslim)
> dictatorial monstrosity created by Ayatollah
> Khomeini.
>
> '
>
> All of that, is how Criminal Minds want you
> to see war:
>
> "Someone wins, and someone loses,"
>
> "you either dominate ('win') or you
> are dominated ('lose')."
>
> That is however not how life
> is, and
>
> indeed all connection to (or
> perception of) how life actually
> is, is lost by them.
>
> But that is how Criminal Minds see and
> experience and handle life.
>
> '
>
> And so they shout: "America is
> 'occupying' Iraq," while America
> - at very great expense too - is
> doing precisely the opposite, is
> FREEING Iraq.
>
> But Criminal Minds have
> everything in reverse.
>
> '
>
> Or, they shouted some fifty years
> earlier: "America is 'occupying'
> Germany."
>
> Because America "won," THEREFORE
> "America is dominating."
>
> That is how Criminal Minds see
> it, and - as you know from them -
> that is what they shout.
>
> But only Criminal Minds want to
> dominate others, so in effect
> they shout, with Che Guevara,
> that caring, helpful and
> courageous, decent people "are
> Criminal Minds."
>
> Criminal Minds have
> everything in reverse.
>
> '
>
> As you know, Life does not at all consist of
> dominating others - only Criminal Minds and
> their helpers will do so, and you will indeed
> have to defend yourself and others against
> them.
>
> '
>
> If you understood the Nature of War, then you would
> have been able to classify Stalin as an enemy, and
> Saddam Hussein as an enemy,
>
> and you know this already closer to home, that you
> better NOT make a Criminal Mind the head of your
> police force,
>
> even though he understands Criminals
> and wants to and does fight Criminals:
>
> His (or her) MOTIVE is to dominate others,
>
> which indeed includes dominating other
> Criminals too.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (f) Criminal Minds will openly or secretly oppose and deny the
> correct understanding of the Nature of War,
>
> which gives you then yet another tool for detecting Criminal
> Minds.
>
> The correct understanding is the subject of this
> Human Rights Issue.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (g) Knowing the Nature of War, you can actually figure out by
> yourself, how to win a war, and how to prevent one.
> (See References, below.)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> (h) Those three small paragraphs at the top {I-01, I-02, I-03},
> which state The Nature of War,
>
> have taken (me) many thousands of years to understand,
> and
>
> the present value to the society, of those three paragraphs,
> could be measured in trillions of dollars. This is suggested
> by the Textnotes above, and by the References below.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> __________
> References:
>
> [Check for updates and for newly applicable HRI's]
>
> 'Military Professional Ethics Code'
> {HRI 20041203-V1.3}
> (3 Dec 2004 - Version 1.3 on 8 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/9d7d0480945bd3ca
>
> 'The First International Law'
> {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
> (24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/e6fd1197b1678b70
>
> 'Rights of Criminal Minds'
> {HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}
> (8 January 2004 - Version 1.0.1 on 12 Nov 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/2d74f7c389973d14http://groups.google.com/group/Koos-Nolst-Trenite/msg/bdf56ba6266de2eb
>
> 'If You Want Peace, Then Do Understand And Face Evil
> - A Short Course In Human Rights Philosophy'
> {HRI 20041225-V1.02}
> (25 December 2004 - Christmas Day)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.rights.human/msg/34578c4c3a9f0b22
> '
>
> '
>
> _________
> Footnotes:
>
> [Check for updates and newly applicable HRI's]
>
> (*) Quoted from Version 2.1 of:
>
> 'Bach Pulling People out of Hell'
> {HRI 20051021-V2.1}
> (21 October 2005 - Version 2.1 on 27 Oct 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/f167f3c3d10c0caa
>
> (1) 'Journalist Current Ethics And Intelligence
> - Refusal To Recognize And Expose Criminal Minds'
> {HRI 20041230-V2.4}
> (30 Dec 2004 - Version 2.4 on 26 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.journalism/msg/228618fec9801d82
>
> (2) 'Issue Note V3.0 on 'The Hippocrates Syndrome - Current State of
> Mental Health Care And Understanding - Consequences For
> Decision Makers, Caretakers And Caregivers' '
> (27 September 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/7e28b77daa515f63
>
> (3) ' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds As 'Ability To Perceive
> Them' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.4}
> (22 April 2004 - Version 2.4 on 21 July 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/b110d81d0be311b8
>
> (4) 'Nobel Prize Committees - Promoting 'NO Peace' And 'NO Science' '
> {HRI 20041214-V1.3} (14 Dec 2004 - Version 1.3 on 28 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/f28136b0a328b1f3
>
> (5) 'What IS Depression or Lethargy' {HRI 20041107-V2.2}
> (7 November 2004 - Version 2.2 on 14 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/e3f79cb2f78d2145
>
> (6) 'Famous European Life Energy Vampires - Unsuspected Of
> Destroying Your Emotional Integrity'
> {HRI 20040729-V1.1}
> (29 July 2004 - Version 1.1 on 27 Aug 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/01ae9af4767aa656
>
> (7) 'Learning And Reading - Leonardo Da Vinci and Galileo Galilei
> had an excellent command of reading and writing'
> {HRI 20040811}
> (11 August 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education/msg/a99e7ca6e050df1a
>
> (8) 'Leonardo Da Vinci - About Aliens, Dimensions, Consciousness,
> Time, And Earth's Past And Future' {HRI 20040829-V3.4.2}
> (29 August 2004 - Version 3.4.2 on 19 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/188f95bcf723f26b
>
> (9) 'Defining 'Destructive Coward' (Definition)'
> {HRI 20050610-V2.1.2}
> (10 June 2005 - Version 2.1.2 on 2 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/9196f0540c551b00
>
> (10) 'Prices of Medical Drugs Compared To Manufacturing Costs And
> To Country Of Sale - The "Bill Gates Factor" '
> (5 February 2005 - Version 2.3.1 on 8 Feb 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.canada/msg/938b775172500428
>
> (11) 'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally
> Lie'
> {HRI 20050527-V3.5}
> (27 May 2005 - Version 3.5 on 10 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/ecc4b12aaae92dcf
>
> (12) 'The Promised Definition of Friendship'
> {HRI-20050327-V2.4.1)
> (27 March 2005 - Version 2.4.1 on 7 Apr 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/d347caafe433b2f0
>
> (13) 'How Do You Face Evil? - A Questionnaire'
> {HRI 20020201}
> (1 February 2002 - issued 20 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/6b618a2abf4838a8
>
> (14) 'Explaining The Scale Of Sanity'
> {HRI 20040619-V3.4}
> (19 June 2004) (Version 3.4 on 2 Sept 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education/msg/7ee775b1a7d5b10f
>
> (15) 'The "Become Perfect"-Mind-Control of Hinduism, Buddhism and
> New-Age Cults'
> {HRI 20050514-V3.1}
> (14 May 2005 - Version 3.1 on 14 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/45bcb24061d2d69c
>
> (16) 'The Promised Definition of Friendship'
> {HRI-20050327-V2.4.1)
> (27 March 2005 - Version 2.4.1 on 7 Apr 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/d347caafe433b2f0
>
> (17) 'Defining Love And Hate - A Law Of Life'
> (29 July 2002 - Version 2.0i on 7 January 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/Koos-Nolst-Trenite/msg/40d2a6d4cadc84b1
>
> (18) 'Example of a Criminal Mind - Tom Cruise is "friends" with
> 'Scientology'-owner David Miscavige'
> {HRI 20040920-V2.4}
> (20 September 2004 - Version 2.4 on 27 July 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/e4c7810c5584c0c7
> (in full:)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/attach/e4c7810c5584c0c7?dmode=...
>
> (19) 'About Loving people - Basic education by example
> - An hour of my life recorded for you'
> {HRI 20050625}
> (25 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/2936f7feb2b3b329
>
> (20) 'Penetrating and Exposing Hinduism and Buddhism'
> {HRI 20060816-V4.3.4}
> (16 August 2006 - Version 4.3.4 on 2 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.econ/msg/58ac7106cd3f5f0b
>
> (21) 'The First International Law'
> {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
> (24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/e6fd1197b1678b70
> '
>
> ____________
> Verification:
>
>
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
>
> Copyright 2005-2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
> and poet
> This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
> anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
> who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
> to others who might be able to learn from it.
> None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
> or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
> encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
> about any organizations or individuals.
> Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
> PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
> (address unreadable for Internet robots
> - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)