Koos Nolst Trenite wrote:
> Islamic Women Allowed FOUR Husbands (For Equal Rights)
>
> 11 March 2007
>
> (Version 2.0)
>
> (Quote (*)
> edited from
> {HRI 20070226-V4.2})
>
>
> '
>
> With fiercely Criminal Energy,
> Criminal Minds will inflict
> and get others to accept
>
> and then, together with those
> Criminal Minds, others create
>
> Criminal ideas and intentions, that
> become then accepted as "normal"
> or "the custom" in life, *(1)
>
> beginning with the enforcement
> of SOME evil,
>
> let's say, to forbid
> the loving and natural
> contact between boys
> and girls and men and
> women, *(1)
>
> the very, very severe evil
> being, to forbid and block
> the love that naturally
> and strongly is present
> between girls and boys,
> and between men and woman,
>
> yes, even to make
> it into a CRIMINAL (!)
> offense, in some
> primitive countries
> or regions dominated
> by severely Criminal
> Minds,
>
> and after you have NOT (and
> BECAUSE you have not) opposed
> and are not opposing THAT evil,
>
> which - accepting the first evil -
> is the beginning of demanding and
> of then enforcing any further evil,
>
>
> BECAUSE THAT IS HOW THE
> CRIMINAL MINDS WORK,
>
> Criminal Minds WANT more
> and more evil,
>
> ALSO Putin and Hu Jintao
> and Jiang Zemin want
> MORE AND MORE evil,
>
> BECAUSE they are Criminal
> Minds,
>
> and so you HAVE to stop them,
> as I explain to you once again,
> now, BUT
>
> also Martin Luther King
> told you,
>
> that, if you do NOT stop the
> evil, that they demand of you,
> then they will inflict and
> enforce the NEXT evil, and
> so on, and *(2)
>
> '
>
> soon (now indeed) you have the
> ultimate in evil on your hands:
>
> People killing themselves, PLUS
> hundreds of others in the same act
>
> - of a suicide bomber, not
> allowed to follow his
> natural love for people,
>
> he or she now has to claim
> and practice DESTRUCTION
> of and HATE for people,
> instead, yes, indeed
>
> HATE for kind and loving
> people, whom he now,
>
> being NOT allowed to
> love those, that he
> naturally DOES love,
>
> much like the
> German people
> were NOT ALLOWED
> to love people
> they naturally
> love, too (people
> DO love people,
> you know) and so
> Germans ALSO do
> love Jewish
> people, but were
>
> forbidden to love them,
> prevented from loving
> those he loves, loves
> naturally - and instead
>
> he NOW wants to destroy
> those he loves - people DO
> love people, you know -
> but instead, he is destroying
> them while destroying his
> own life,
>
> forbidden to enjoy
> life, forbidden by
> his own "masters,"
> to love. *(1)
>
> (End edited Quote)
>
> YOU DON'T THINK, that a man or a woman in love, will blow
> himself or herself up, and hundreds of innocent people in
> the process, now, will you...
>
> NOR will they - being naturally in love with their fellow men
> and women - participate in public chants by psychopaths that
> demand the death of millions of people, nor will they deny past
> inflicted deaths and betrayal of millions of people, now, will
> they...
>
NL
A. Waar komt dit vandaan?
B. Waarom doe je alsof je iemand antwoord
C. de, fr, nl, be, en dk... de tereurbolwerken waaraan je je onzin
adresseerd?
D. Was het weghalen van 'Re:' echt nodig? (duidend op een dialoog)
EN
A. Where does the source post come from?
B. Why must it look like you are answering someone in a discussion?
(This is not your local Nazi metingpoint... jet)
C. de, fr, nl, be, en dk... are those the new members of 'the axes of evil'?
D. Was going true the pain of removing 'Re:' really necessary (you
spoiled the 1 thing that made it look like you're a hero/crusader)?
> '
>
> Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
> human rights philosopher and poet
E. NOT!
Prolete cultuurbarbaar in een splagaat tussen superieuriteitswaan en
Calimero syndroom
JayJBee
"Poeet? Proleet! / pro?. 'Lame'!"
>
> 'Men of all nations came
> to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
> sent by all the kings of the world,
> who had heard of his wisdom.'
>
> 1 Kings 4:34
>
> (*) 'Destroying "science," Christ 'not allowed' to do miracles -
> Pre-introduction to Fine Particle Physics'
> {HRI 20070226-V4.2}
> (26 February 2007 - Version 4.2 on 11 March 2007)
>
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/dbbe9d9c9ba1aa88
> '
>
> (1) ' 'Sacks' In Any Religion (definition of 'Sacks')'
> {HRI 20060521-V1.4.1-UAA}
> (21 May 2006 - Version 1.4.1-UAA on 9 Oct 2006)
>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/673b717cde49ed54
> '
>
> (2) 'The First Law of Human Rights'
> {HRI 20060601-V2.2.2}
> (1 June 2006 - Version 2.2.2 on 8 Sept 2006)
>
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/3b9985c64f1287f1
> '
>
> ____________
> Verification:
>
>
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
>
> Copyright 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
> and poet
> This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
> anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
> who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
> to others who might be able to learn from it.
> None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
> or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
> encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
> about any organizations or individuals.
> Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
> PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
> (address unreadable for Internet robots
> - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)
>