"Jesper" <spambuster@users.toughguy.net> wrote in message
news:1hu202c.n47yuq1kdflhcN%spambuster@users.toughguy.net...
> Poul Nielsen <mega@lan.com> wrote:
>
>>
http://www.conservapedia.com/
>>
>>
>> A conservative encyclopedia you can trust.
>> Conservapedia has over 3,400 educational, clean and concise entries
>> on
>> historical, scientific, legal, and economic topics, as well as more
>> than 350
>> lectures and term lists. There have been over 252,000 page views
>> and over
>> 14,800 page edits. Already Conservapedia has become one of the
>> largest
>> user-controlled free encyclopedias on the internet. This site is
>> growing
>> rapidly.
>>
>> Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is
>> increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many
>> of the
>> dates are provided in the anti-Christian "C.E." instead of "A.D.",
>> which
>> Conservapedia uses. Christianity receives no credit for the great
>> advances
>> and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance. Read
>> a list
>> of many Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.
>
> Handler Conservapedia så om helkonserves eller havlkonserves ?
Det lyder som om Wikipedia, der ikke vil optage én anstændig artikel
om Glistrup, er blevet rød og uduelig og der er fremskridt i den ny
conservapedia.com