'My Pearls not for Pigs'
(Revision 2.0)
(Suitable for foreign
language students)
The "respondent(s)" - to whom this applies (in the proverb,
they are referred to as 'pigs') - is (are) already covered in
'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030509-V4.2.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 4.2.1 on 30 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/1de918df6abdd38c?fcw=1
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.org.un/msg/e18a87e4f1dd0c1f?fcw=1
and further, in
'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5.2}
(27 May 2005 - Version 3.5.2 on 16 Jul 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/c8b4f54782dc87e8?fwc=1
'
Anybody, who DENIES the existence and relevance of
Criminal Minds, is most likely one himself (or herself)
regardless of what religion he may pretend to adhere
to, or may be lacking in:
Criminal Minds can be and are found in ANY religion,
any nationality, any race, any age, any gender, any
profession, any level of education or wealth or
the lack of it.
At least one percent of the living population on
Earth consists of very severely Criminal Minds.
Examples: Kim Long Il, Hu Jintao, Jiang Zemin,
Vladimir Putin, Ahmadinejad, Chavez, are
Criminal Minds
- regardless of whether you like to see that.
(Stalin, Ghengis Khan, Pol Pot and Hitler, for
instance, are generally known as Criminal
Minds.)
'
The "respondent(s)" tries(try) to have the matter I write about,
not read, not understood, or not discussed,
in some cases, they pretend the very opposite, by the
method of claiming, that what I write "is not in a
readable format or layout," and also "too long," and
that (therefore) "nobody will read it,"
a PRETENSE and a claim, that in fact - as it
turned out to be, in each case - IS a standard
response of Criminal Minds;
THEY feel irritated exactly BY the
CLARITY of the layout or format,
much in the same way as some feel
"irritated" by the clarity of
Bach's music,
because it OPPOSES confusion,
and of course, THEY feel irritated by ANY
length of what I write and say, even by
my presence and by my looking at them,
much in the same way as some
contemporaries of Mozart wanted
to have him away or get rid of him:
His Beauty EXPOSES their
Ugliness, makes it visible,
much like honesty does
inevitably reveal treachery;
'
further, the attentive reader will have
noticed, that the layout precisely is intended
and allows the reader
to spend as little or as much time as he or she
desires to spend on reading,
by seeing the indented text as more and
more EXPANSION or detail of the subject;
all of which the "respondent(s)" does
(do) not mention,
'
and basically, the "respondent(s)" mentioned or implied,
are describing themselves only, or are outing themselves
as being Criminal Minds - if they were not already known
as such.
'
In this case, he (or she, as the case may be) wants, that
the nature of the subject, and anyone addressed, but in
particular he (or she) himself,
is NOT (or not correctly) UNDERSTOOD BY OTHERS, IS NOT (or not
properly) FELT BY OTHERS, let alone discussed
by people who would be interested in making the subject felt well
and understood well, by those for whom
Koos Nolst Trenite writes or wrote, in this case:
> People are not "Anti-American"
>
> 6 January 2007
> {HRI 20070106-V1.2}
>
> '
>
> You can END, finish, that label - invented or used by Criminal Minds,
> like by American Henry Kissinger and by France's Jacques Chirac for
> instance - of
>
> "people being Anti-American."
>
> '
>
> And, no matter how much Criminal Minds promote that "label"
> or replace it by any other label,
>
> which they do for the sole purpose of HIDING THEIR
> OWN CONDITION OF MIND,
>
> you can END that false 'labeling'
>
> (unless you are employed or otherwise paid by the
> Associated Parrots (abbr. AP) of course):
>
> '
>
> '
>
> People are people - and they can be 'FOR LIFE' or 'AGAINST LIFE.'
>
> And that is all there is to it,
>
> and when they are AGAINST life, then they invent
> ENDLESS variations, on how to hide and cover that up,
>
> to HIDE the simple fact, that they are
>
> ANTI LIFE.
>
> '
>
> '
> You know very well, what I am talking about: It is Anti-Life, to call
> your actual, true friends your enemies, and to want to destroy your
> actual, true friends, while shouting loudly, that "they are your
> enemies."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Iraq's Shiite cleric 'Muqtada al-Sadr' is NOT "Anti-American" as HE
> and all psychotics with him claim to be, BUT he is ANTI-LIFE,
> ANTI-PEOPLE, ANTI-ALLAH, and ANTI-IRAQ
>
> - and so are Associated Press Writers STEVEN R. HURST and QASSIM
> ABDUL-ZAHRA in Iraq, and other journalists when they are
> reporting Criminal Minds NOT to be Criminal Minds, but to be
> "Anti-American'."
>
> Such "journalism" amounts to war mongering,
>
> as I will explain yet another time, to those who
> still can not by themselves understand The Nature
> of War - which I have explained in the HRI of
> the same title. *(9)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Shiite cleric 'Muqtada al-Sadr' is VERY, VERY busy destroying Iraq.
>
> And so, in REFUSING TO REMOVE this al-Sadr, Iraq's Prime Minister
> Nouri al-Maliki, is directly destroying or allowing the
> destruction of Iraq.
>
> '
>
> And, it is NOT a matter of 'crushing the militia of "anti-American"
> Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, one of the prime minister's most
> powerful backers,' BUT
>
> IT IS a matter of (looking at the REFUSAL TO REMOVE, and then
> REMOVING) that individual
>
> who is very severely intending and carrying out his
> intention - supported by Iran's Ahmadinejad - to destroy
> Iraq, to destroy his very OWN country.
>
> How many times have you now believed, that Criminal
> Minds will not destroy but want to protect THEIR OWN
> country?
>
> If you subscribed to the Associated Press, you
> probably STILL think, that Castro is "NOT destroying
> Cuba."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> I have "never told you that," but Criminal Minds DO want to destroy
> life,
>
> and in order to do so, they have to pretend to protect it so
> that they are put in charge and then can destroy their country,
> like Germany or Cambodia or Russia, or more recently Cuba, Burma,
> Sudan, Venezuela, and the like.
>
> To "need support" from a Criminal Mind, or to "support a Criminal
> Mind," is ALWAYS a suicidal act, as it is now shown by Iraq's
> Prime Minister al-Maliki,
>
> who thinks, "if he removes the deadly parasite (al-Sadr)
> from his body, THEN he (al-Maliki) himself will die."
>
> "THEN he will be accused of favoring Americanism over
> Iraq."
> "Because (the deadly parasite) al-Sadr 'is Anti-
> American':"
>
> '
>
> Shiite cleric 'Muqtada al-Sadr' is NOT "Anti-American" BUT ANTI-LIFE,
> ANTI-PEOPLE, ANTI-ALLAH, and ANTI-IRAQ.
>
> And he HIDES that, much like France's Chirac hides his
> mental condition, by (in)citing "Anti-Americanism."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> There is no such thing IN REALITY, as "people being Anti-American,"
>
> people are people - and they can be FOR life, or AGAINST life:
>
> for LIFE, or against LIFE.
>
> The whole label of "Anti-American" or "Anti-Chinese" or "Anti-
> Pasta," such labels
>
> are just lies, the labels themselves are INTENTIONAL LIES to MAKE
> you use the wrong "remedy" and to PREVENT you from taking the
> CORRECT actions,
>
> as I explained to you in the HRI 'The Nature of War,' *(9)
>
> and they do so by covering up the truth, by labeling people,
> and BY ALLOWING PEOPLE TO LABEL THEMSELVES as "Anti-American" or
> "Anti-Chinese" (or "Anti-Pasta":)
>
> People are people - regardless of race, nationality,
> religion, gender, age, wealth, education, social
> status or the lack of these -
>
> and they can be FOR life, or AGAINST life.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> I am very sorry I "never told you that," and "I abase myself for that
> grave omission on my part:"
>
> The Motive Of Murder, Terror, Domination, Rioting, Vandalism, etc., Is
> NOT Political, NOT Ethnic, NOT Religious, NOT for lack of Wealth or
> Education
>
> 3 August 2005
> {HRI 20050803-V3.4.1}
>
> (Version 3.4.1
> on 11 Nov 2005)
>
> '
>
> The motive of murder, terror and domination, vandalism, etc. is
>
> NOT political, NOT ethnic, NOT militant or insurgent,
> NOT religious, NOT for material possessions, NOT from poverty,
> NOT from lack of education
>
> - this you know very well -
>
> as none of those conditions have turned you into a murderer or
> vandalist
>
> - quite the contrary, you worked hard to overcome these
> conditions -
>
> nor will these ever turn you into a murderer or other type of
> criminal, because
>
> - should you care to look further than Criminal Minds
> allow -
>
> those are not and never will be the actual motives,
>
> they are merely ideas that are used, at times, by Criminal
> Minds *(3) and by Destructive Cowards, *(5) to cover up and
> to make seem right, what is ACTUALLY motivating them:
>
> the JOY of hindering, harming, degrading, destroying life.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> IT IS the JOY of murdering, terrorizing and dominating others,
> and of vandalizing and destroying as much of life as they are
> allowed to destroy.
>
> That IS the nature of Criminal Minds, and there are
> about one percent of them in ANY population, regardless
> of race, religion, social status, age, gender, education
> or wealth.
>
> The only thing you see different, is that in
> some areas and groups, MORE DISAGREEMENT WITH
> CRIMINAL IMPULSES is being maintained.
>
> Criminal Minds are halted by others, before
> he or she manages to execute the intended
> destruction also physically.
>
> And those who do anyway succeed in it,
> are hunted down and arrested, in such
> a society.
>
> When a society grows, then that system
> normally also grows with it, meaning,
> an adequate system of
>
> DISAGREEING WITH CRIME, and of
>
> prosecuting crime successfully.
>
> '
>
> Crime is, what you and anyone natively
> know is crime. (It is not the same as
> rules or customs, but sometimes and
> ideally, these overlap.)
>
> However, you have societies (countries)
> on Earth, where
>
> DISAGREEING WITH CRIME has been
> or is being made impossible
>
> for a long time and on a large
> scale.
>
> '
>
> This has happened in Iraq for
> forty years, and it has been
> going on and is going on in
> many other countries
>
> - whether communistic or
> fascistic or "socialistic"
> or "nationalistic," etc.,
> which describes merely what
> type of lies they tell and
> use to hide Crime -
>
> TO PREVENT PEOPLE FROM
> DISAGREEING WITH CRIME
>
> also in China, which is thus
> made into a time bomb of evil,
>
> very strongly intended so by the
> known Criminal Mind Hu Jintao.
>
> '
>
> This is all happening under
> your very own nose, what the
> Chinese people do to each other,
>
> forcefully, and by implementing
> and using laws and their own
> government institutions and
> government funds,
>
> TO PREVENT EACH OTHER FROM
> DISAGREEING WITH CRIMES.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> They try to exert their JOY of murdering, of terrorizing and
> of dominating others, and of vandalizing and of destroying as
> much of life as they are not prevented from destroying,
>
> before they are halted
>
> - as they ARE halted in a civilized society.
>
> That is why Criminal Minds - including Hu Jintao - come down
> so very hard on people who DO NATURALLY DISAGREE WITH CRIME.
>
> THESE are imprisoned, or prevented from having work, or
> they are put in psychiatric institutions, or 'murdered'
> otherwise, in other ways,
>
> BY CRIMINAL MINDS.
>
> '
>
> CRIMINAL MINDS WANT CRIME - maybe I can get you to
> actually understand those four words, today.
>
> Apparently the history lessons you got at
> school were that bad, that you did not learn
> anything from these.
>
> Or if you DID learn something, then the
> journalists will have knocked it out
> of your awareness and understanding
> most thoroughly, no doubt.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> What they do, is not called "violence" or "unrest," or
> "differences" or "friction," or "disagreements," etc., *(1)
>
> it is also not called "none of your business" (as in 'internal
> affairs'), but it IS, and
>
> it IS ONLY the JOY of murdering, or terrorizing and
> dominating others, and the JOY of vandalizing beautiful
> and valuable things and people.
>
> That is how it is, and how it always has been,
> and always will be.
>
> Criminal Minds do not change, they also do not "evolve,"
> they do not "grow up,"
>
> but normally, they are recognized and prevented
> from doing too much evil and destruction, in
> a balanced and free society.
>
> And with the advent of Press Agencies,
>
> and with the deliberate destruction of
> any understanding of human nature, destroyed
> by the medical and physical "sciences,"
>
> journalists have since long given up the
> function of ensuring a balanced and free
> society.
>
> If you can't even define free and
> balanced... how can you be expected
> to ensure it.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> People are not there, for being murdered
>
> - this you know.
>
> And people do not exist EITHER, for the purpose of being
> terrorized or being dominated,
>
> which is the spiritual equivalent of being murdered
> physically.
>
> '
>
> Criminal Minds, however, ENJOY to murder and to terrorize and to
> dominate people, and to destroy or steal their possessions.
>
> '
>
> They seek opportunities to do so unhindered.
>
> That is written in all the pages of your history books
> at school,
>
> pages that were staring at you as if they had
> nothing to do with you,
>
> "empty" pages, not filled with life by you,
>
> forbidden to come to life
>
> - very real life, however, your life, really,
> describing YOUR life,
>
> without saying so, even denying THAT it has
> so very much to do with YOU.
>
> '
>
> In order to be unhindered or even supported in their JOY of
> murdering people and of terrorizing people, or to vandalize and
> riot, Criminal Minds - which includes the Criminal Mind Sigmund
> Freud - try to find "reasons,"
>
> that journalists *(1) and also other people - of even
> lower intellect and responsibility - will accept, and
> agree with. *(2)
>
> Or, refusing to face the most simple things
>
> as it is not their profession to make things
> simple,
>
> journalists INVENT "interesting reason,"
>
> like you know it from people at a party, who
> try to be "interesting."
>
> The truth is MOST interesting, of
> course and indeed, but THAT is not what
> they have the courage and care and love
> for people, to say or write.
>
> '
>
> An endless amount of terms these journalists parroted,
> or made up themselves,
>
> from "unrest" to "anger" to "violence,"
>
> not to mention "insurgent," "separatist," "militant,"
> "Maoist," "Stalinist," "nationalist," and "ethnic,"
> "minority," or "religious" and other "motives:"
>
> The most horrid crimes that any normal person
> would refuse to tolerate, are justified or
> are hidden as "internal affairs,"
>
> as in "Kim Jong Il is allowed to murder,
> torture, terrorize or dominate or starve as
> many people as he likes - as long as these are
> North Koreans (people who live in North Korea)"
> *(6)
>
> or in "Mao Ze Dong or Hu Jintao is allowed to
> dominate, starve, imprison, torture or murder
> as many people as he likes - as long as these
> are Chinese (people living in, or having been
> forced to become part of the Chinese
> 'motherland')," *(9)
>
>
> ALL OF WHICH "reasons" merely translate into and are used
>
> so, that they can ENJOY to murder and to terrify and to dominate
> people,
>
> to terrorize and dominate as many people as possible,
>
> and to do so preferably unhindered and even while being admired
> or rewarded for their malice,
>
> and given a pompous reception by the Canadian
> government or by the British Queen, in return for
> enough money:
>
> Billions of dollars even buys the conscience
> and a fake smile from Britain's Tony Blair,
>
> - Tony Blair could easily have said,
> and should indeed have said PUBLICLY,
>
> "I do not want to do business with a
> Criminal Mind like Hu Jintao, as
> doing so, would be our gravely
> insulting
>
> - and also assisting severe
> harm inflicted currently on -
>
> all the people of China:
>
> Send someone else, who DOES represent
> the Chinese people, if you want to do
> business with us British,"
>
> '
>
> which he would have said if blessed
> with the courage to act as a SANE and
> RESPONSIBLE statesman deciding -
>
> over a billion dollars
>
> - getting one dollar per Chinese person
> whose freedom in China is sold to the
> devil -
>
> rather having one billion dollars,
>
> than allowing the freedom to be happy,
> to live in dignity, and,
>
> - which is the main part of
> enjoying any happiness -
>
> to naturally see and oppose Crime, a
> freedom relinquished in exchange for
> one billion dollars,
>
> in order to further Crime,
>
> as Hu Jintao, the 'head of state,' demands
> and forces all people in China,
>
> to commit most vehemently on each other,
>
> over a billion dollars accepted by Tony
> Blair, as we saw today in London,
>
> FOR WHICH HE NOW HAS TO SPEND TEN
> BILLION DOLLARS IN DEFENSE SYSTEMS
> and defense efforts AGAINST CHINA
>
> - a "really good business deal,"
> isn't it -
>
> '
>
> while Tony Blair's opposition party
> members, however - being far MORE
> cowardly themselves than Tony Blair
> is - have not pointed out any of these
> things
>
> to Tony Blair who generally
> speaking is a very courageous
> person, but who certainly has
> been blinded by the spiritual
> force and tricks of the Criminal
> Mind, "the Emperor of China,"
> on Tony Blair, now again
>
> feeling compelled to "please" the slick and
> greasy, but not less deadly Criminal Mind who
> through his continuous and hidden Crimes,
> became 'the head of state,'
>
> the Criminal Mind Hu Jintao, who
> demands of others TO BE BLIND TO CRIME,
>
> who DEMANDS blindness to evil being
> committed and having been committed
> and that will be committed,
>
> inflicting a blindness that all Criminal
> Minds dominate others into,
>
> a blindness that they try to compel
> onto others, with their spiritual
> force to inflict compulsions *(9)
> onto others,
>
> as explained in the Human Rights
> Issues, explained by simply
> stating your own nature,
>
> because your own nature is
> opposed to Crime,
>
> your own nature is also opposed
> to hidden and to camouflaged
> Crime, and opposed to blindness
> to Crimes,
>
> in this example involving the Crime that can
> be labeled as
>
> 'RATHER HAVING ONE BILLION DOLLARS
> THAN ONE BILLION HAPPY CHINESE
> PEOPLE,'
>
> '
>
> billions of dollars, received to help and assist a
> terrorizing and murderous Criminal Mind, Hu Jintao,
>
> to assist him in dominating and terrorizing and
> destroying the society of over one billion Chinese,
>
> without any necessity whatsoever (how could
> there ever be a "necessity" for that, other
> than in the mind and words of a Criminal or
> a Coward wanting "stability"
>
> ...meaning Crime NOT opposed, NOT made public, but
> sanctioned by "law" and originated by the Chinese
> government of 'the motherland')
>
> - the British hosts just could have said:
> "Send someone else, not a Criminal Mind,
> we do not accept a Criminal Mind to
> represent the Chinese people" -
>
> but, not caring for the Chinese people, and
> thus not caring actually for their own (the
> British) people either, these British gave
> the Criminal Mind Hu Jintao a state banquet
> reception,
>
> '
>
> covered up with "reasons," *(7)
>
> in order "to explain" it, to make it "seem right" or
> "acceptable" or felt as "you must not oppose it," and
>
> so these "reasons" are used by them to HIDE and
> camouflage the malice which IS called murder and
> terror and domination.
>
> '
>
> That is something, that "great" individuals like Oprah
> Winfrey, like Michael Jackson, like Bill Gates, and
> other Criminal Minds *(3)(4), will take indeed 'great
> care' NOT to tell you,
>
> something which they - and all other "celebrities"
> too - remain remarkably and most cowardly silent
> about. *(5)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> So, with that knowledge, you are going to actually take some
> responsibility, that others - including 'the Secretary General,'
> Kofi Annan, *(8)(9) most definitely do NOT want to take:
>
> Which individuals (not excluding any heads of state and their
> aides) finance or supply or condone (allow) such acts of murder,
> or terror and domination? *(6)
>
> If possible, *(a) provide names and locations and functions,
>
> and why you know or suspect or assume or have concluded, that
>
> a particular individual (again, including any heads of any
> states and their aides) is financing or supplying or
> condoning those who do the murdering or terrorizing and
> dominating.
>
> '
>
> I would like to have these matters understood by enough people, to
> thereby sufficiently diminish (- see References, below, to remedy)
>
> the continuous confusion and insanity as relayed and perpetuated
> in particular by the journalists. *(1)
>
> I have consistently concerned myself with resolving this Human
> Rights issue, as you know.
>
> '
>
> Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
> human rights philosopher and poet
>
> 'God gave Solomon wisdom
> and very great insight,
> and a breadth of understanding
> as measureless
> as the sand on the seashore.'
>
> 1 Kings 4:29
>
> ________
> Textnote:
>
> (a) For the comfort of those who help, I think it is now well known,
> that I am not entirely incapable of determining the value and the
> degree of truth of your answer, and to thus truly appreciate your
> correct efforts.
> '
>
> _________
> Footnotes:
>
> [Consult for latest updates the 'Checklist of Human Rights Issues'
> {HRI update list 20061202}]
>
> (1) 'Journalist Current Ethics And Intelligence
> - Refusal To Recognize And Expose Criminal Minds'
> {HRI 20041230-V2.4} (30 Dec 2004 - Version 2.4 on 26 June 2005)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/alt.politics/msg/131abeb764cd8d31?fwc=1
>
> (2) 'You Prefer To Feel The Pleasant, Caring MASK Of Criminal Minds'
> (27 July 2005 - Quoted from {HRI 20040920-V2.4} )
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/bb346d9baa481457?fwc=1
>
> (3) 'Rights of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20040108} (8 January 2004)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/4a17f5ae89e89655?fwc=1
>
> (4) 'Famous American Life Energy Vampires - Unsuspected Of Destroying
> Your Emotional Integrity' {HRI 20031110-V3.3}
> (10 November 2003 - Version 3.2 on 18 June 2005)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/e5133db89e3b2193?fwc=1
>
> (5) 'Defining 'Destructive Coward' (Definition)' {HRI 20050610-V2.1.2}
> (10 June 2005 - Version 2.1.2 on 2 Aug 2005)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/9196f0540c551b00?fwc=1
>
> (6) 'The First International Law' {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
> (24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/e6fd1197b1678b70?fwc=1
>
> (7) ' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds As 'Ability To Perceive
> Them' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.4}
> (22 April 2004 - Version 2.4 on 21 July 2005)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/b110d81d0be311b8?fwc=1
>
> (8) 'Nobel Prize Committees - Promoting 'NO Peace' And 'NO Science' '
> {HRI 20041214-V1.3} (14 Dec 2004 - Version 1.3 on 28 Dec 2004)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/67494581cfde9535?fwc=1
>
> (9) 'The Nature of War' {HRI 20051027-V1.6}
> (27 Oct 2005 - Version 1.6 on 7 Nov 2005)
>
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/a99ee7b45f3118a?fwc=1
> '
>
> _________
> Reference:
>
> 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
> {HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}
> (7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
>
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/4129fa4f1a67840e?fwc=1
> '
>
> ____________
> Verification:
>
>
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
>
> Copyright 2005, 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
> and poet
> This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
> anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
> who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
> to others who might be able to learn from it.
> None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
> or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
> encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
> about any organizations or individuals.
> Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
> PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
> (address unreadable for Internet robots
> - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)