---

Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
A Partial List
The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel, Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack
against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other refugee camps in
Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs
of Israel: The Massacre of

1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.
2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.
3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.
4. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.
5. Carmel, April 20, 1948.
6. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948.
7. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.
8. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.
9. Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.
10. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.
11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.
12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.
13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.
14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.
15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.
16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.
17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.
18. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.
19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.
20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.
21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.
22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.
23. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.
24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.
25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.
26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.

July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people. Menachem Begin, who was recently given the
so-called Nobel Peace Prize (It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it!), and is the same
Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a
member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the
even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities. Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed
by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient
and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included
bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.

1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of
air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S.
Naval units had been dispatched to the scene. The Irgun Gang murdered almost 100 British by bombing the King David Hotel. Terrorism
also was (and still is) routinely practiced against Arabs to stampede them out of Palestine, thereby reducing their demographic strength even
as uninvited Jews stream into the country.

The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946, which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of
58, was not just an "extremist act" of "Jewish extremists," but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest
Jewish political authorities in Palestine, the Jewish Agency and its head David Ben-Gurion. According to Yitshaq Ben-Ami, a Palestinian
Jew who spent 30 years in exile after the establishment of Israel investigating the crimes of the "ruthless clique heading the international
Zionist movement." "The Irgun had conceived a plan for the King David attack early in 1946, but the green light was given only on July
first. According to Dr. Sneh, the operation was personally approved by Ben-Gurion, from his self-exile in Europe. Sadeh, the operations
officer of the Hagnah, and Giddy Paglin, the head of the Irgun operation under Menachem Begin agreed that thirty-five minutes advance
notice would give the British time enough to evacuate the wing, without enabling them to disarm the explosion." (Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years
of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller, 1982), p. 377)

The Jewish Agency's motive was to destroy all evidence the British had gathered proving that the terrorist crime waves in Palestine were
not merely the actions of "fringe" groups such as the Irgun and Stern Gang, but were committed in collusion with the Haganah and Palmach
groups and under the direction of the highest political body of the Zionist establishment itself, namely the Jewish Agency.

That so many innocent civilian lives were lost in the King David massacre is a normal part of the pattern in the history of
Zionist outrages: A criminal act is committed, allegedly by an isolated group, but actually under the direct authorization of the highest
Zionist authorities, whether of the Jewish Agency during the Palestine Mandate or of the Government of Israel thereafter.

It is a remarkable fact that the Jews emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max
Nassbaum, the former chief rabbi of he Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: "The position the Jewish people occupy today
in the world; despite the enormous losses, is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago." It should be added, if one is to e honest,
that the strength has been much consolidated financially by he supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
allegation of all time.

To date, e staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation (For a HoloHoax that never happened)
by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (Which never existed until after the Second World War), as well
as to individual Jewish claims.

Discouragement of Nationalism: In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second
World War has much far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply be advantages it has gained for the Jews.
Here one comes in the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first pace, it has been used quite unscrupulously
to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and
preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as"new-Nazis."

Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened then; Six Million Jews exterminated! So long as the myth
is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to, the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home
by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished.

A classic example of the use of the "Six Million" as an anti-national weapon appears in Manvell and Frank's book, "The Incomparable
Crime" (London, 1967), which deals with "Genocide in the Twentieth Century." Anyone with an ounce of pride in being British will be
surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book.

The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British prison in India: "Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and
became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and the Nazi theory of the 'Herrenvolk'...but we in India have
known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British rule. The whole ideology of this rule was that of the 'Herrenvolk'
and the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The
English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God given right to govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were
reminded of the 'tiger qualities of an imperial race.'"

The authors Manvell and Franki then go on to make the point perfectly fear for all: "The White races of Europe and America," they
write, "have become used during the centuries to regarding themselves as a 'Herrenvolk.' The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz,
has also achieved he first stage in the recognition of multi-racial partnership." (The Incomparable crime, by Manvell and Franki, p.14)

The Race Problem Suppressed

One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious hint about "multi-racial partnership." Thus the accusation of the
Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It
is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather a the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages.

Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history,
the danger poised by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans
and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration
and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we have been a nation.

In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares
to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a "racialist." And
what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of
racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain
in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.

Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could
have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue
to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed
the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them
impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.

The American historian Harry Elmer Barnes once wrote that "An attempt to make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of
the extermination question...is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today." In attempting
this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from our own
shoulders, so that we may freely confront the dangers which threaten us all.

---

Dump your religion and find something to do with your life, other than fight
over tribal god images.

HC

---

Salah Jafar skrev:

> Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
> A Partial List
> The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel, Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack
> against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other refugee camps in
> Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs
> of Israel: The Massacre of
>
> 1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.
> 2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.
> 3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.
> 4. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.
> 5. Carmel, April 20, 1948.
> 6. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948.
> 7. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.
> 8. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.
> 9. Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.
> 10. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.
> 11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.
> 12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.
> 13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.
> 14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.
> 15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.
> 16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.
> 17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.
> 18. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.
> 19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.
> 20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.
> 21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.
> 22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.
> 23. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.
> 24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.
> 25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.
> 26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.
>
> July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people. Menachem Begin, who was recently given the
> so-called Nobel Peace Prize (It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it!), and is the same
> Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a
> member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the
> even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities. Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed
> by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient
> and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included
> bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.
>
> 1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of
> air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S.
> Naval units had been dispatched to the scene. The Irgun Gang murdered almost 100 British by bombing the King David Hotel. Terrorism
> also was (and still is) routinely practiced against Arabs to stampede them out of Palestine, thereby reducing their demographic strength even
> as uninvited Jews stream into the country.
>
> The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946, which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of
> 58, was not just an "extremist act" of "Jewish extremists," but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest
> Jewish political authorities in Palestine, the Jewish Agency and its head David Ben-Gurion. According to Yitshaq Ben-Ami, a Palestinian
> Jew who spent 30 years in exile after the establishment of Israel investigating the crimes of the "ruthless clique heading the international
> Zionist movement." "The Irgun had conceived a plan for the King David attack early in 1946, but the green light was given only on July
> first. According to Dr. Sneh, the operation was personally approved by Ben-Gurion, from his self-exile in Europe. Sadeh, the operations
> officer of the Hagnah, and Giddy Paglin, the head of the Irgun operation under Menachem Begin agreed that thirty-five minutes advance
> notice would give the British time enough to evacuate the wing, without enabling them to disarm the explosion." (Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years
> of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller, 1982), p. 377)
>
> The Jewish Agency's motive was to destroy all evidence the British had gathered proving that the terrorist crime waves in Palestine were
> not merely the actions of "fringe" groups such as the Irgun and Stern Gang, but were committed in collusion with the Haganah and Palmach
> groups and under the direction of the highest political body of the Zionist establishment itself, namely the Jewish Agency.
>
> That so many innocent civilian lives were lost in the King David massacre is a normal part of the pattern in the history of
> Zionist outrages: A criminal act is committed, allegedly by an isolated group, but actually under the direct authorization of the highest
> Zionist authorities, whether of the Jewish Agency during the Palestine Mandate or of the Government of Israel thereafter.
>
> It is a remarkable fact that the Jews emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max
> Nassbaum, the former chief rabbi of he Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: "The position the Jewish people occupy today
> in the world; despite the enormous losses, is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago." It should be added, if one is to e honest,
> that the strength has been much consolidated financially by he supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
> allegation of all time.
>
> To date, e staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation (For a HoloHoax that never happened)
> by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (Which never existed until after the Second World War), as well
> as to individual Jewish claims.
>
> Discouragement of Nationalism: In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second
> World War has much far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply be advantages it has gained for the Jews.
> Here one comes in the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first pace, it has been used quite unscrupulously
> to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and
> preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as"new-Nazis."
>
> Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened then; Six Million Jews exterminated! So long as the myth
> is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to, the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home
> by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished.
>
> A classic example of the use of the "Six Million" as an anti-national weapon appears in Manvell and Frank's book, "The Incomparable
> Crime" (London, 1967), which deals with "Genocide in the Twentieth Century." Anyone with an ounce of pride in being British will be
> surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book.
>
> The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British prison in India: "Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and
> became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and the Nazi theory of the 'Herrenvolk'...but we in India have
> known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British rule. The whole ideology of this rule was that of the 'Herrenvolk'
> and the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The
> English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God given right to govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were
> reminded of the 'tiger qualities of an imperial race.'"
>
> The authors Manvell and Franki then go on to make the point perfectly fear for all: "The White races of Europe and America," they
> write, "have become used during the centuries to regarding themselves as a 'Herrenvolk.' The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz,
> has also achieved he first stage in the recognition of multi-racial partnership." (The Incomparable crime, by Manvell and Franki, p.14)
>
> The Race Problem Suppressed
>
> One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious hint about "multi-racial partnership." Thus the accusation of the
> Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It
> is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather a the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages.
>
> Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history,
> the danger poised by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans
> and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration
> and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we have been a nation.
>
> In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares
> to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a "racialist." And
> what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of
> racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain
> in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.
>
> Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could
> have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue
> to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed
> the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them
> impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.
>
> The American historian Harry Elmer Barnes once wrote that "An attempt to make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of
> the extermination question...is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today." In attempting
> this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from our own
> shoulders, so that we may freely confront the dangers which threaten us all.

Get lost, boring moron. Go back to your beloved Mullahs, you don't
belong to the civilized world.

RR

---

On 3 Oct 2006 07:57:57 -0700, raireme@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Salah Jafar skrev:

<snip - quoted garbage>

>Get lost, boring moron. Go back to your beloved Mullahs, you don't
>belong to the civilized world.

Don't do the moron a favour by re-crossposting his garbage.

---

Salah Jafar wrote:
> Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
> A Partial List
> The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel, Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack
> against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other refugee camps in
> Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs
> of Israel: The Massacre of ...<


Let's see who started it all in Palestine, going back to 1921 ( I admit
the Jewish extreme leftists were troublemakers too):
-------------
>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article describes violent events in Palestine of May 1-May 7,
1921, usually referred to as the Jaffa riots, and their effects.

The events

On May 1, 1921, fighting began in Tel Aviv-Jaffa between rival groups
of Jewish activists: Bolsheviks, carrying Yiddish banners demanding
Soviet Palestine versus Socialists parading on May Day. The Socialists
had police permission, while the Communists did not and, when fighting
broke out, the police chased the communists back into the Tel Aviv.

Hearing the fighting, the Arabs of Jaffa feared they were under attack
by the Jews and went on the offensive. Fighting went on for several
days and spread throughout Palestine.

Immediate aftermath

Fatalities were: 45 Jews, 48 Arabs. Wounded: 146 Jews, 73 Arabs.

**Note: Arab casualties resulted from clashes with British forces
attempting to restore order.**

After the riots, thousands of Jewish residents of Jaffa fled for Tel
Aviv, and were temporarily housed in tent camps on the beach.
The newspaper Kuntress whose author and co-editor Yosef Haim Brenner
was one of the victims, published an article Entrenchment: "on May 1
the age of innocence had ended."

The British administration made some arrests. After international
outcry, the arrested Jews were acquitted on the grounds of
self-defense.

The Arab leaders submitted a petition to the League of Nations in which
they expressed their grievances.

The Investigative Commission report:

The high commissioner of the Mandate Sir Herbert Samuel established an
investigative commission headed by the chief justice of the Supreme
Court in Palestine Sir Thomas Haycraft. Its report has confirmed the
Arab policemen's participation in the riots and also has deemed the
actions taken by the authorities adequate. The report angered both Jews
and Arabs: it placed the blame on the Arabs, but said that "Zionists
were not doing enough to mitigate the Arabs' apprehensions".

Highlights from the report:

"The racial strife was begun by the Arabs, and rapidly developed
into a conflict of great violence between Arabs and Jews, in which the
Arab majority, who were generally the aggressors, inflicted most of the
casualties."

"A large part of the Moslem and Christian communities condoned it
[the riots], although they did not encourage violence. While certain of
the educated Arabs appear to have incited the mob, the notables on both
sides, whatever their feelings may have been, aided the authorities to
allay the trouble."

"The [Arab] police were, with few exceptions, half-trained and
inefficient, in many cases indifferent, and in some cases leaders or
participators in violence."

"The raids on five Jewish agricultural colonies arose from the
excitement produced in the minds of the Arabs by reports of Arabs being
killed by Jews in Jaffa. In two cases unfounded stories of provocation
were believed and acted upon without any effort being made to verify
them."

That motif would be repeated in the 1929 Hebron massacre:

"In these raids there were few Jewish and many Arab casualties,
chiefly on account of the intervention of the military."

The consequences

In his speech on the occasion of the Royal birthday in June 1921,
Samuel stressed Britain's commitment to the second part of the Balfour
Declaration and declared that Jewish immigration would be allowed only
to the extent that it did not burden the economy. Then Jewish
immigration was suspended.

Britain's policy regarding its League of Nations Mandate to
re-establish Jewish National Home in Palestine changed to "fixing by
the numbers and interests of the present population" the future Jewish
immigration. Thus a popular contemporary criticism was that Samuel had
revised the Balfour Declaration and Mandate from establishing the
Jewish National Home into creating an Arab National Home.

New bloody riots broke out in Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem on November
2, 1921, when five Jewish residents and three of their Arab attackers
were killed.

In Tel Aviv

Tel Aviv had been a bedroom community at the time of the Jaffa riots,
with its workers commuting to Jaffa. However, when Jews started
perceiving Jaffa as a hostile place due to the riots, they decided to
develop a business district in downtown Tel Aviv, which eventually
became renowned for its Bauhaus architecture.

References

* ISBN 0-7475-7366-2 City of Oranges: Arabs and Jews in Jaffa by
Adam LeBor
* ISBN 1-56663-189-0 Weathered by Miracles: A history of Palestine
from Bonaparte and Muhammad Ali to Ben-Gurion and the mufti (by Thomas
A. Idinopulos)

---

"Salah Jafar" <codeman128@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EUtUg.7061$pS3.4354@trnddc01...
Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine


NONE.

Pest control is not murder.

Silly raghead doesn't know that he is below roaches on the food chain.



Jim E

---

On 3-Oct-2006, "Jim E" <YD656359@SEA.edu> wrote:

> "Salah Jafar" <codeman128@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:EUtUg.7061$pS3.4354@trnddc01...
> Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
>
>
> NONE.
>
> Pest control is not murder.

Which is a rude way of outting it, but, yes: these were either fights
not started by Israel, or outright lies (such as in Sabra/Shatilla).

Susan
>
> Silly raghead doesn't know that he is below roaches on the food chain.

---

If these massacres happened then why didn't the Arab League help?
Instead they passed two resolutions in 1949.
1. Prohibited Arab governments from giving citizenship to Palestinian
Arab refugees.
2. Ordered Arab governments to facilitate the expulsion of Jews
living in Arab Countries?

Why do we still hear about the Palestinian refugees? They have been
refugees for 59 years.
Why didnt anyone complain when Egypt and Jordan had control over the
West Bank and Gaza?

The problem in the Middle East is not the fault of Israel.
Andee



Salah Jafar wrote:
> Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
> A Partial List
> The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel, Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack
> against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other refugee camps in
> Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs
> of Israel: The Massacre of
>
> 1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.
> 2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.
> 3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.
> 4. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.
> 5. Carmel, April 20, 1948.
> 6. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948.
> 7. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.
> 8. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.
> 9. Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.
> 10. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.
> 11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.
> 12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.
> 13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.
> 14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.
> 15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.
> 16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.
> 17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.
> 18. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.
> 19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.
> 20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.
> 21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.
> 22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.
> 23. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.
> 24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.
> 25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.
> 26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.
>
> July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people. Menachem Begin, who was recently given the
> so-called Nobel Peace Prize (It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it!), and is the same
> Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a
> member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the
> even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities. Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed
> by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient
> and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included
> bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.
>
> 1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of
> air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S.
> Naval units had been dispatched to the scene. The Irgun Gang murdered almost 100 British by bombing the King David Hotel. Terrorism
> also was (and still is) routinely practiced against Arabs to stampede them out of Palestine, thereby reducing their demographic strength even
> as uninvited Jews stream into the country.
>
> The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946, which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of
> 58, was not just an "extremist act" of "Jewish extremists," but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest
> Jewish political authorities in Palestine, the Jewish Agency and its head David Ben-Gurion. According to Yitshaq Ben-Ami, a Palestinian
> Jew who spent 30 years in exile after the establishment of Israel investigating the crimes of the "ruthless clique heading the international
> Zionist movement." "The Irgun had conceived a plan for the King David attack early in 1946, but the green light was given only on July
> first. According to Dr. Sneh, the operation was personally approved by Ben-Gurion, from his self-exile in Europe. Sadeh, the operations
> officer of the Hagnah, and Giddy Paglin, the head of the Irgun operation under Menachem Begin agreed that thirty-five minutes advance
> notice would give the British time enough to evacuate the wing, without enabling them to disarm the explosion." (Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years
> of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller, 1982), p. 377)
>
> The Jewish Agency's motive was to destroy all evidence the British had gathered proving that the terrorist crime waves in Palestine were
> not merely the actions of "fringe" groups such as the Irgun and Stern Gang, but were committed in collusion with the Haganah and Palmach
> groups and under the direction of the highest political body of the Zionist establishment itself, namely the Jewish Agency.
>
> That so many innocent civilian lives were lost in the King David massacre is a normal part of the pattern in the history of
> Zionist outrages: A criminal act is committed, allegedly by an isolated group, but actually under the direct authorization of the highest
> Zionist authorities, whether of the Jewish Agency during the Palestine Mandate or of the Government of Israel thereafter.
>
> It is a remarkable fact that the Jews emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max
> Nassbaum, the former chief rabbi of he Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: "The position the Jewish people occupy today
> in the world; despite the enormous losses, is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago." It should be added, if one is to e honest,
> that the strength has been much consolidated financially by he supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
> allegation of all time.
>
> To date, e staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation (For a HoloHoax that never happened)
> by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (Which never existed until after the Second World War), as well
> as to individual Jewish claims.
>
> Discouragement of Nationalism: In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second
> World War has much far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply be advantages it has gained for the Jews.
> Here one comes in the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first pace, it has been used quite unscrupulously
> to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and
> preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as"new-Nazis."
>
> Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened then; Six Million Jews exterminated! So long as the myth
> is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to, the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home
> by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished.
>
> A classic example of the use of the "Six Million" as an anti-national weapon appears in Manvell and Frank's book, "The Incomparable
> Crime" (London, 1967), which deals with "Genocide in the Twentieth Century." Anyone with an ounce of pride in being British will be
> surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book.
>
> The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British prison in India: "Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and
> became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and the Nazi theory of the 'Herrenvolk'...but we in India have
> known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British rule. The whole ideology of this rule was that of the 'Herrenvolk'
> and the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The
> English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God given right to govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were
> reminded of the 'tiger qualities of an imperial race.'"
>
> The authors Manvell and Franki then go on to make the point perfectly fear for all: "The White races of Europe and America," they
> write, "have become used during the centuries to regarding themselves as a 'Herrenvolk.' The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz,
> has also achieved he first stage in the recognition of multi-racial partnership." (The Incomparable crime, by Manvell and Franki, p.14)
>
> The Race Problem Suppressed
>
> One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious hint about "multi-racial partnership." Thus the accusation of the
> Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It
> is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather a the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages.
>
> Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history,
> the danger poised by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans
> and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration
> and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we have been a nation.
>
> In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares
> to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a "racialist." And
> what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of
> racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain
> in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.
>
> Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could
> have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue
> to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed
> the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them
> impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.
>
> The American historian Harry Elmer Barnes once wrote that "An attempt to make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of
> the extermination question...is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today." In attempting
> this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from our own
> shoulders, so that we may freely confront the dangers which threaten us all.

---

flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
> On 5-Oct-2006, "Jim E" <YD656359@SEA.edu> wrote:
>
> > <Boedicia@isp.com> wrote in message
> > news:1159953243.888123.128750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > Jim E wrote:
> > >> "Salah Jafar" <codeman128@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:EUtUg.7061$pS3.4354@trnddc01...
> > >> Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> NONE.
> > >>
> > >> Pest control is not murder.
> > >
> > > That's what Hitler said about the jew.
>
> And he wrote it the same way Beodicia does!

"Boedicia". One of these days I'll read a post of yours without at
least one
typing error and I'll faint.

> What a surprise! Not.
>
> > > We know *his* reasons,
>
> *Also* the same as hers! What a surprise! Not.
>
> > > what are yours?

> > 9/11
>
> Be honest - that's just the most notorious incident.
> But you know you only hate terrorists, not all Muslims.

Ask him how he feels about all those commie terrorists in the 50's
who
gave America's secrets to Russia. Do you suppose he even knows their
names?

---

Still trying to pump out the old bullshit.

"Salah Jafar" <codeman128@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EUtUg.7061$pS3.4354@trnddc01...
Massacres Committed by the Jews in Palestine
A Partial List
The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel,
Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack
against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the
massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other refugee camps in
Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the
Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs
of Israel: The Massacre of

1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.
2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.
3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.
4. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.
5. Carmel, April 20, 1948.
6. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948.
7. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.
8. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.
9. Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.
10. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.
11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.
12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.
13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.
14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.
15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.
16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.
17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.
18. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.
19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.
20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.
21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.
22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.
23. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.
24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.
25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.
26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.

July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91
people. Menachem Begin, who was recently given the
so-called Nobel Peace Prize (It seems this prize is given to the people who
can kill the most Christians and get away with it!), and is the same
Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre
of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a
member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none
other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the
even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities.
Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed
by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we
could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient
and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in
those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included
bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.

1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops
along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of
air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S.
Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S.
Naval units had been dispatched to the scene. The Irgun Gang murdered almost
100 British by bombing the King David Hotel. Terrorism
also was (and still is) routinely practiced against Arabs to stampede them
out of Palestine, thereby reducing their demographic strength even
as uninvited Jews stream into the country.

The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946, which resulted in the
deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of
58, was not just an "extremist act" of "Jewish extremists," but a
premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest
Jewish political authorities in Palestine, the Jewish Agency and its head
David Ben-Gurion. According to Yitshaq Ben-Ami, a Palestinian
Jew who spent 30 years in exile after the establishment of Israel
investigating the crimes of the "ruthless clique heading the international
Zionist movement." "The Irgun had conceived a plan for the King David attack
early in 1946, but the green light was given only on July
first. According to Dr. Sneh, the operation was personally approved by
Ben-Gurion, from his self-exile in Europe. Sadeh, the operations
officer of the Hagnah, and Giddy Paglin, the head of the Irgun operation
under Menachem Begin agreed that thirty-five minutes advance
notice would give the British time enough to evacuate the wing, without
enabling them to disarm the explosion." (Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years
of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller, 1982), p. 377)

The Jewish Agency's motive was to destroy all evidence the British had
gathered proving that the terrorist crime waves in Palestine were
not merely the actions of "fringe" groups such as the Irgun and Stern Gang,
but were committed in collusion with the Haganah and Palmach
groups and under the direction of the highest political body of the Zionist
establishment itself, namely the Jewish Agency.

That so many innocent civilian lives were lost in the King David massacre
is a normal part of the pattern in the history of
Zionist outrages: A criminal act is committed, allegedly by an isolated
group, but actually under the direct authorization of the highest
Zionist authorities, whether of the Jewish Agency during the Palestine
Mandate or of the Government of Israel thereafter.

It is a remarkable fact that the Jews emerged from the Second World War as
nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max
Nassbaum, the former chief rabbi of he Jewish community in Berlin, stated on
April 11, 1953: "The position the Jewish people occupy today
in the world; despite the enormous losses, is ten times stronger than what
it was twenty years ago." It should be added, if one is to e honest,
that the strength has been much consolidated financially by he supposed
massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
allegation of all time.

To date, e staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid
out in compensation (For a HoloHoax that never happened)
by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel
(Which never existed until after the Second World War), as well
as to individual Jewish claims.

Discouragement of Nationalism: In terms of political blackmail, however,
the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second
World War has much far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and
Europe than simply be advantages it has gained for the Jews.
Here one comes in the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its
purpose? In the first pace, it has been used quite unscrupulously
to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any
other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and
preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of
nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as"new-Nazis."

Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened
then; Six Million Jews exterminated! So long as the myth
is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to, the need for
international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home
by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of
freedom, is abolished.

A classic example of the use of the "Six Million" as an anti-national
weapon appears in Manvell and Frank's book, "The Incomparable
Crime" (London, 1967), which deals with "Genocide in the Twentieth Century."
Anyone with an ounce of pride in being British will be
surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book.

The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British
prison in India: "Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and
became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and
the Nazi theory of the 'Herrenvolk'...but we in India have
known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British
rule. The whole ideology of this rule was that of the 'Herrenvolk'
and the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were
subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The
English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God given right to
govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were
reminded of the 'tiger qualities of an imperial race.'"

The authors Manvell and Franki then go on to make the point perfectly fear
for all: "The White races of Europe and America," they
write, "have become used during the centuries to regarding themselves as a
'Herrenvolk.' The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz,
has also achieved he first stage in the recognition of multi-racial
partnership." (The Incomparable crime, by Manvell and Franki, p.14)

The Race Problem Suppressed

One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious
hint about "multi-racial partnership." Thus the accusation of the
Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and
national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It
is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather a the threat of hellfire
and damnation was in the Middle Ages.

Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and
Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history,
the danger poised by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is
done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans
and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart
from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration
and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we
have been a nation.

In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European
culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares
to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications?
He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a "racialist." And
what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So
everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of
racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew
attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain
in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the
specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.

Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to
preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could
have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to
preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue
to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story
of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed
the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked
in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them
impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.

The American historian Harry Elmer Barnes once wrote that "An attempt to
make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of
the extermination question...is surely the most precarious venture that an
historian or demographer could undertake today." In attempting
this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to
historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from our own
shoulders, so that we may freely confront the dangers which threaten us all.