---

Asolut læseværdig artikel, som afslører den massive doubletalk, som
bruges i forbindelse med hizballah's angreb på Israel:

http://tinyurl.com/s23qz

En smagsprøve:

'Civilians' in Lebanon have munitions in their basements and deliberately
wish to draw fire; in Israel they are in bunkers to avoid it. Israel uses
precision weapons to avoid hitting them; Hezbollah sends random missiles
into Israel to ensure they are struck.

'Collateral damage' refers mostly to casualties among Hezbollah’s human
shields; it can never be used to describe civilian deaths inside Israel,
because everything there is by intent a target.

'Cycle of Violence' is used to denigrate those who are attacked, but are
not supposed to win.

'Deliberate' reflects the accuracy of Israeli bombs hitting their
targets; it never refers to Hezbollah rockets that are meant to destroy
anything they can.
....
But most of all, the world deplores the Jewish state because it is
strong, and can strike back rather than suffer. In fact, global onlookers
would prefer either one of two scenarios for the long-suffering Jews to
learn their lesson. The first is absolute symmetry and moral equivalence:
when Israel is attacked, it kills only as many as it loses. For each
rocket that lands, it drops only one bomb in retaliation — as if any
aggressor in the history of warfare has ever ceased its attacks on such
insane logic.

The other desideratum is the destruction of Israel itself. Iran promised
to wipe Israel off the map, and then gave Hezbollah thousands of missiles
to fulfill that pledge. In response, the world snored. If tomorrow more
powerful rockets hit Tel Aviv armed with Syrian chemicals or biological
agents, or Iranian nukes, the 'international' community would urge
'restraint' — and keep urging it until Israel disappeared altogether. And
the day after its disappearance, the Europeans and Arabs would sigh
relief, mumble a few pieties, and then smile, 'Life goes on.'

And for them, it would very well.


--
Med venlig hilsen
GB