/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
Fakta om slaveriet i USA (eng)
Fra : Peter Bjørn Perlsø


Dato : 17-04-06 12:40

Historical Facts You Weren't Told

We do not support slavery and this material is not to suggest that we
do. It is simply to inform those who have been misled in regard to the
Civil War.

1) The wife of which Civil War General still owned slaves after the end
of the Civil War? General U.S. Grant of the Union or General Robert E.
Lee of the Confederacy?

Answer: General U.S. Grant, later to become President, sought to sell
his wife's two slaves while in an impoverished condition after the war.
This was legal because, while the Emancipation Proclamation abolished
slavery in states in rebellion on January 1, 1863, it was not outlawed
in the rest of the Union until the passage of the 13 Amendment three
years later on December 31, 1865.

2) Which country outlawed African slave trade in their original
constitution? The United States of America or the Confederate States of
America?

Answer: The Confederate States of America allowed the owning of slaves,
however the importation of new African slaves was made illegal because
they felt that it might cause the warring of African tribes against each
other. The people captured in tribal conflicts were sold by the winning
tribe to slave traders. The people of the South felt that the slave
trade encouraged these bloody conflicts to continue. As compassionate as
they were in coming to this conclusion and assuming responsibility in
these bloody African conflicts, we see that they were mistaken as
African tribal warfare continues to this very day.


3) Who said, "Any people anywhere, being inclined, and having the power,
have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and
form a new one that suits them better." Abraham Lincoln, President of
the United States or Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederacy?

Answer: Abraham Lincoln, Jan. 12 1848 - spoken to the U.S. House of
Representatives.


4)Who said, "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere
with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe
I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States or Jefferson Davis,
President , President of the Confederate States of America?

Answer: Abraham Lincoln - First Inaugural Address - March 4, 1861.


5) Who said, "If I thought this war was to abolish slavery, I would
resign my commission and offer my sword to the other side" ?

Answer: General U.S. Grant 1862

6) What was the major emphasis of the Emancipation Proclamation?

Answer: The Emancipation Proclamation is 540 words long. of those, 400
words limit the proclamation to the states in rebellion - it defines the
states in rebellion and states that it is directed ONLY to the states in
rebellion. It further says that if those states in rebellion would cease
and return to the union within 100 days then they would keep slavery
intact.



***

Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.


--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/

 
 
Bo Warming (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : Bo Warming


Dato : 17-04-06 14:22

""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message
news:1hdxxq3.p6xw6ajtiqidN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk...
> Historical Facts You Weren't Told

Læs også Erling Bjøl "USA s historie"

Borgerkrigen startede fordi nordstaterne med diskriminatorisk
toldlovgivning og lignende søgte at berøve sydstaterne deres
importindtægter fra bomuld

Der er brug for revisionisme også her - sandhedssøgende
historieskrivning i stedet for den politisk korrekte pseudohumanistisk
fordomsfulde SEJRER PÅ ALLE FRONTER

John Brown henrettedes tidligt i borgerkrigen pga sin uundskyldelige
psykopatvold. At han løslod slaver og propaganderede imod sydstaterne
var uvæsentligt på det tidspunkt, men en sang om ham gav krigsmod til
nordstatshæren da krigen var næsten vundet.



#2066 (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : #2066


Dato : 17-04-06 16:59

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:48 +0200, Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:

[...]
>
> Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
> anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
> Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.

Du glemte en kildehenvisning: <http://www.kkk.bz/hisfacts.htm>



Peter Bjørn Perlsø (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : Peter Bjørn Perlsø


Dato : 17-04-06 17:03

#2066 <neslein@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:48 +0200, Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
> > anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
> > Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.
>
> Du glemte en kildehenvisning: <http://www.kkk.bz/hisfacts.htm>

Det er ski' ikke der jeg har hentet den fra (jeg hentede den fra
ProtestWarrior.com), men det er meget pudsigt at KKK også bruger den.

--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/

Per Rønne (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : Per Rønne


Dato : 17-04-06 17:56

#2066 <neslein@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:48 +0200, Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
> > anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
> > Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.
>
> Du glemte en kildehenvisning: <http://www.kkk.bz/hisfacts.htm>

Ku Klux Klan?

Pinligt, Peter ...
--
Per Erik Rønne
http://www.RQNNE.dk

Peter Bjørn Perlsø (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : Peter Bjørn Perlsø


Dato : 17-04-06 18:13

Per Rønne <per@RQNNE.invalid> wrote:

> #2066 <neslein@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:48 +0200, Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
> > > anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
> > > Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.
> >
> > Du glemte en kildehenvisning: <http://www.kkk.bz/hisfacts.htm>
>
> Ku Klux Klan?
>
> Pinligt, Peter ...
> --
> Per Erik Rønne
> http://www.RQNNE.dk

Hvad er der nu galt med Klanen? Er de ikke *gode kristne*?


--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/

Per Rønne (17-04-2006)
Kommentar
Fra : Per Rønne


Dato : 17-04-06 18:38

Peter Bjørn Perlsø <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote:

> Per Rønne <per@RQNNE.invalid> wrote:
>
> > #2066 <neslein@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:48 +0200, Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Lige for at understrege at Lincoln altså ikke var den store
> > > > anti-slaveri-mand som han er fremstillet som, og at alle der boede i
> > > > Sydstaterne altså ikke var racister og slavejere.
> > >
> > > Du glemte en kildehenvisning: <http://www.kkk.bz/hisfacts.htm>
> >
> > Ku Klux Klan?
> >
> > Pinligt, Peter ...
> > --
> > Per Erik Rønne
> > http://www.RQNNE.dk
>
> Hvad er der nu galt med Klanen? Er de ikke *gode kristne*?

Du kunne vist lige så godt have talt om Aryan Brotherhood, som der i
øjeblikket kører en artikelserie om i Berlingske Tidende.

Hvad er der i øvrigt galt med din MacSOUP? Du skal da ikke også citere
min signatur, og trykker du blot på f-tasten får du hele mit indlæg til
at kommentere på, uden signaturen.
--
Per Erik Rønne
http://www.RQNNE.dk

Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177516
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408629
Brugere : 218887

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste