---

Bør børn se på hovedafhugninger, steninger, piskninger og amputationer?
diskuterer man i Saudi Arabien. De foregår offentligt på de såkaldte "Chop
squares", og man kan ikke mere nøjes med at bruge fredagen, så travlt har
man.

Wahhabi-islam er også væsentlig i Danmark. Den gren er også her, den
hurtigst voksende type af islam, - delvis fordi nogle af de unge bliver mere
rabiate, og delvis fordi pengestrømmen fra Saudiarabien er en uudtømmelige
flod, især nu hvor milliarderne ruller ind i SA's statskasse. Også Wahid
Pedersen melder om en stigning i tilhængerne af wahhabi-isme.


The Saudi Gazette - 12. Sept 2005


Jeddah

EDUCATORS and religious scholars are mostly against letting children watch
Shariah court verdicts like beheading, stoning to death, amputation or
lashing, a report said Sunday.

I am of the view that children must be forbidden from watching the execution
of Shariah penalties so that we are able to protect our future generations
from negative effects, in the same way as some countries that prevent
children from watching films with horrifying scenes, Dr. Abdul Aziz Bin
Abdullah Al-Dakheel, Assistant Professor of Social Service in King Saud
University, told the Arabic daily Okaz.

Shariah penalties are carried out in an open yard in full view of the
public. This is so as to deter others from committing similar crimes.

However, the educators and religious scholars Okaz spoke to opined that
children should be spared such blood-chilling sights as beheadings and
amputations.

The experience could deeply affect children, and plague them all their
lives, Dakheel said, citing what he said were proven scientific studies.

He drew a comparison with violent scenes in movies and how ratings have come
about to keep children below 18 years of age away from them.

Dr. Ali Bin Abdullah Al-Afnan, Dean of the Teacher s Training College in
Riyadh argued from a psychological perspective and said the mental
immaturity of childhood should be taken in consideration. Children go by
their feelings, from what they see and hear, and which influences their
conduct and personality, he explained.

He felt that it is the duty of fathers to not expose their children to
painful atmospheres and experiences. Psychological researches have proved
that violent scenes have a direct affect in molding a child s personality.

Exposing children to violent and gruesome scenes may make them aggressive
and effect their personality, he said.

Dr. Eid Bin Abdullah Al-Shammari, former member of the Shoura Council,
however, thought otherwise.

He said such exposure would be beneficial and deter children from taking to
crime.

Deterrence is not only for adults but also for children, he said.

Besides, witnessing scenes would help curb the violent tendencies in many
students who attack their teachers and smash their cars, he maintained.

Such deeds were not there in the past.

Sheikh Sa eed Al-Helayyil Al-Amr, director of the Religious Studies
Institute in Hail, was against children accompanying their fathers to the
public square where Shariah penalties are carried out.

He said that the Prophet (peace be upon him) used to order Muslims to bring
their children to perform prayers during the two Eid feasts, but he did not
order them to watch the execution of Shariah penalties.

---

Knud Larsen wrote:
> Bør børn se på hovedafhugninger, steninger, piskninger og
> amputationer? diskuterer man i Saudi Arabien. De foregår offentligt
> på de såkaldte "Chop squares", og man kan ikke mere nøjes med at
> bruge fredagen, så travlt har man.

Det er den saudiske pendant til Ritt Bjerregaards undervisningspolitik.
Hvad ikke alle har, skal ingen have.

Det er hovedløst, og det kan ikke være mange Panodiler, der bliver solgt
i det land; men hovedsagen her må være, at de ikke bare hovedkuls kaster
sig ud i at spille bowling med hovedet under armen. Dét ville være
grotesk.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4366284c$0$84029$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> Knud Larsen wrote:
>> Bør børn se på hovedafhugninger, steninger, piskninger og
>> amputationer? diskuterer man i Saudi Arabien. De foregår offentligt
>> på de såkaldte "Chop squares", og man kan ikke mere nøjes med at
>> bruge fredagen, så travlt har man.
>
> Det er den saudiske pendant til Ritt Bjerregaards undervisningspolitik.
> Hvad ikke alle har, skal ingen have.
>
> Det er hovedløst, og det kan ikke være mange Panodiler, der bliver solgt
> i det land; men hovedsagen her må være, at de ikke bare hovedkuls kaster
> sig ud i at spille bowling med hovedet under armen. Dét ville være
> grotesk.

Jeg er enig i, at det er halsløs gerning at spotte Guds lov i Saudi Arabien.

---

"Knud Larsen" <larsen_knud@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4366003b$0$67255$157c6196@dreader2.cybercity.dk...
> Bør børn se på hovedafhugninger, steninger, piskninger og amputationer?
> diskuterer man i Saudi Arabien. De foregår offentligt på de såkaldte "Chop
> squares", og man kan ikke mere nøjes med at bruge fredagen, så travlt har
> man.
>
> Wahhabi-islam er også væsentlig i Danmark. Den gren er også her, den
> hurtigst voksende type af islam, - delvis fordi nogle af de unge bliver
> mere rabiate, og delvis fordi pengestrømmen fra Saudiarabien er en
> uudtømmelige flod, især nu hvor milliarderne ruller ind i SA's statskasse.
> Også Wahid Pedersen melder om en stigning i tilhængerne af wahhabi-isme.
>

De andre retninger taler også for at følge Allahs straffelovgivning, så det
har kun mindre betydning hvilken gren som øjeblikkeligt har mest medgang.

Straffen halshugning bruges ikke i alle muhamedanerlande, men hvis landene
skal følge den guddommelige lov, er det påkrævet at have en halsretsstraf på
repertoiret. De fleste muhamedanerlande bruger vist hængning som alternativ
til halshugning.


--
9. oktober 1993 beskrev Politiken fra Saudi-Arabien årets halshugning nr.
75 - de fleste offentlige som kulmination på fredagsbønnen midt på dagen.
(Glistrup-citat)