---

Her er så noget totalt ultimativt - hvis det passer:

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running
a drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London
Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was
happening in real life on July 7th.

In a BBC Radio 5 interview which was aired on that very evening, July
7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor
Consultants, a firm which labels itself as a 'crisis management' advice
company, also known as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time
with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Visor's managing director told the radio show's host that at the exact
same time as the London bombings were taking place, his company was
running a 1,000 person strong exercise drill in which the London
Underground was being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact
same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an
exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on
simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it
happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck
standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see
how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the
exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we
planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to
reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had
a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so
within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the
real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis
management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and
so on.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the
bombings goes beyond to it being a 'coincidence'. According to Power the
drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were
thought to have been spread over an hour, but that was later confirmed
by police as being wrong and that in fact the bombings were only seconds
apart, therefore simultaneous.

Whether Mr. Power and Visor Consultants were 'in on the bombing' or
anything of that nature is not that important as the British government
or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run
the exercise for a number of purposes.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of September 11th 2001
with the CIA conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC
and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in
operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. What
this meant was that the NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22
hijacked airliners at the same time. As NORAD had been briefed that this
was part of the exercise drill normal reactive procedure was forestalled
and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens which displayed both the
real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why press reports released
immediately afterwards were confusing citing that up to eight planes had
been hijacked.

According to the spokesman of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA), the agency was in New York the night before 9/11
FEMA spokesman Tom Kenney said to news anchorman Dan Rather in an
interview on Wednesday, September 12th, 2001 that FEMA was deployed to
New York on Monday night, September 10th, to be ready to go into action
on Tuesday morning, September 11th.

Kenney: "We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to
support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived on late
Monday night, and went into action on Tuesday morning. And not until
today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site."

Needless to say, Kenney's statement was denied and put down to the
official's confusion over the dates.

However, when former New York City mayor Rudolph Guliani testified
before the 9/11 Commission the story was blown:

"... the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on
the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had
hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from
the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were
getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be
the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already
there, so we were able to establish a command center there, within three
days, that was two and a half to three times bigger than the command
center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there
that the rest of the search and rescue effort was completed."

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial
complex of the West has been caught time and again of carrying out
bombings and other attacks around the world in a bid to further their
corporate aims and blame their enemies.

The London "terror alert" level was lowered before the bombings took
place. Thus giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the
attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

The wider agenda will become clearer once Tony Blair points the finger
of blame at the selected parties designated to the fall. But for the
moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immediately
returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will
now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European
Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise.

Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to
carry out the attack.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip
where the comments can be heard in their full context.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/090705exercise_clip_2.mp3

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/090705exercise_clip.mp3

Ovenstående link er til interviewet.
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/conspiracy_theory/fullstory.asp?id=247


Same-time-as-attack underground bombing exercise in London a chilling
coincidence?
By Judi McLeod & David Hawkins
Saturday, July 9, 2005 9:00 p.m.

Toronto-- Chillingly coincidental, the same 9/11 "war games" conducted
during the actual tragedy on the morning of September 11, 2001, echo
London underground "bombing exercises" which took place at the same time
as the real attack, according to Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com.

What are the odds of both human tragedies having coincidental "drills"
going on at the exact same time real life was taking so many human lives
in two terrorist attacks?

NORAD was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the World
Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning, September 11, 2001. A
CIA planned exercise on September 11 was built around a plane crashing
into a building.

"It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in
operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11/2001,"
Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones wrote for Prison Planet.com today.

Basing their information on a BBC Radio 5 interview, Watson and Jones
say a consulting agency with government and police connections was
running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the
London Underground being bombed at the exact times and locations as
happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

"The host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor
Consultants, which bills itself as a `crisis management advice company',
better known to you and I as a PR firm.

"Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London
bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person
strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the
exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

"Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time
with the Anti Terrorist Branch."

Power told BBC that the drill focused around "simultaneous bombings".
Originally the London bombings were thought to have been spread over an
hour, but BBC reports today say that the bombings were in fact
simultaneous.

Watson and Jones say, "The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact
locations and times of the bombings is light years ahead beyond a
coincidence".

(In the drills on Sept. 11, 2001) "NORAD radar screens showed as many as
22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this
was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure
was forestalled and delayed."

And the NORAD and Visor Consultants drills are not the only factors
linking the 9/11 and London terrorist attacks.

The British experience is the same play on the market as what happed on
9/11. Advance knowledge of these events could be making someone rich.
U.S. treasuries go up. The Pound goes down. The Euro goes up as do gold
and the Swiss Franc.

Who is the biggest trader in U.S. treasuries? Cantor Fitzgerald, owner
of eSpeed, whose New York offices were on the 101st-105th floors of One
World Trade Center.

ESpeed stock was shorted 42 percent of its value from August 7 to
September 7, 2001 and no one seems to know why.

Coming Monday: 9/11 and the Mob by Judi McLeod & David Hawkins.

Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod is an award-winning
journalist with 30 years experience in the media. A former Toronto Sun
and Kingston Whig Standard columnist, she has also appeared on
Newsmax.com, the Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and World Net Daily. Judi
can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2005/cover070905a.htm

---

Nogen speciel grund til at du sender nedenstående klipperier i to tråde.
Trunte
"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42d1685e$0$172$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> Her er så noget totalt ultimativt - hvis det passer:
>
> A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running
> a drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London
> Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was
> happening in real life on July 7th.
>
> In a BBC Radio 5 interview which was aired on that very evening, July
> 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor
> Consultants, a firm which labels itself as a 'crisis management' advice
> company, also known as a PR firm.
>
> Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time
> with the Anti Terrorist Branch.
>
> Visor's managing director told the radio show's host that at the exact
> same time as the London bombings were taking place, his company was
> running a 1,000 person strong exercise drill in which the London
> Underground was being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact
> same times, as happened in real life.
>
> The transcript is as follows.
>
> POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an
> exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on
> simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it
> happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck
> standing up right now.
>
> HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see
> how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the
> exercise?
>
> POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we
> planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to
> reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had
> a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so
> within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the
> real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis
> management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and
> so on.
>
> The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the
> bombings goes beyond to it being a 'coincidence'. According to Power the
> drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were
> thought to have been spread over an hour, but that was later confirmed
> by police as being wrong and that in fact the bombings were only seconds
> apart, therefore simultaneous.
>
> Whether Mr. Power and Visor Consultants were 'in on the bombing' or
> anything of that nature is not that important as the British government
> or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run
> the exercise for a number of purposes.
>
> This is precisely what happened on the morning of September 11th 2001
> with the CIA conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC
> and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.
>
> It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in
> operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. What
> this meant was that the NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22
> hijacked airliners at the same time. As NORAD had been briefed that this
> was part of the exercise drill normal reactive procedure was forestalled
> and delayed.
>
> The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens which displayed both the
> real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why press reports released
> immediately afterwards were confusing citing that up to eight planes had
> been hijacked.
>
> According to the spokesman of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
> (FEMA), the agency was in New York the night before 9/11
> FEMA spokesman Tom Kenney said to news anchorman Dan Rather in an
> interview on Wednesday, September 12th, 2001 that FEMA was deployed to
> New York on Monday night, September 10th, to be ready to go into action
> on Tuesday morning, September 11th.
>
> Kenney: "We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to
> support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived on late
> Monday night, and went into action on Tuesday morning. And not until
> today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site."
>
> Needless to say, Kenney's statement was denied and put down to the
> official's confusion over the dates.
>
> However, when former New York City mayor Rudolph Guliani testified
> before the 9/11 Commission the story was blown:
>
> "... the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on
> the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had
> hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from
> the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were
> getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be
> the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already
> there, so we were able to establish a command center there, within three
> days, that was two and a half to three times bigger than the command
> center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there
> that the rest of the search and rescue effort was completed."
>
> The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial
> complex of the West has been caught time and again of carrying out
> bombings and other attacks around the world in a bid to further their
> corporate aims and blame their enemies.
>
> The London "terror alert" level was lowered before the bombings took
> place. Thus giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the
> attack without having to evade the most stringent security.
>
> The wider agenda will become clearer once Tony Blair points the finger
> of blame at the selected parties designated to the fall. But for the
> moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immediately
> returned to London to take control of the chaos.
>
> BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will
> now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European
> Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise.
>
> Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?
>
> The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to
> carry out the attack.
>
> Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip
> where the comments can be heard in their full context.
>
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/090705exercise_clip_2.mp3
>
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/090705exercise_clip.mp3
>
> Ovenstående link er til interviewet.
> http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/conspiracy_theory/fullstory.asp?id=247
>
>
> Same-time-as-attack underground bombing exercise in London a chilling
> coincidence?
> By Judi McLeod & David Hawkins
> Saturday, July 9, 2005 9:00 p.m.
>
> Toronto-- Chillingly coincidental, the same 9/11 "war games" conducted
> during the actual tragedy on the morning of September 11, 2001, echo
> London underground "bombing exercises" which took place at the same time
> as the real attack, according to Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com.
>
> What are the odds of both human tragedies having coincidental "drills"
> going on at the exact same time real life was taking so many human lives
> in two terrorist attacks?
>
> NORAD was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the World
> Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning, September 11, 2001. A
> CIA planned exercise on September 11 was built around a plane crashing
> into a building.
>
> "It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in
> operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11/2001,"
> Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones wrote for Prison Planet.com today.
>
> Basing their information on a BBC Radio 5 interview, Watson and Jones
> say a consulting agency with government and police connections was
> running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the
> London Underground being bombed at the exact times and locations as
> happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.
>
> "The host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor
> Consultants, which bills itself as a `crisis management advice company',
> better known to you and I as a PR firm.
>
> "Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London
> bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person
> strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the
> exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.
>
> "Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time
> with the Anti Terrorist Branch."
>
> Power told BBC that the drill focused around "simultaneous bombings".
> Originally the London bombings were thought to have been spread over an
> hour, but BBC reports today say that the bombings were in fact
> simultaneous.
>
> Watson and Jones say, "The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact
> locations and times of the bombings is light years ahead beyond a
> coincidence".
>
> (In the drills on Sept. 11, 2001) "NORAD radar screens showed as many as
> 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this
> was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure
> was forestalled and delayed."
>
> And the NORAD and Visor Consultants drills are not the only factors
> linking the 9/11 and London terrorist attacks.
>
> The British experience is the same play on the market as what happed on
> 9/11. Advance knowledge of these events could be making someone rich.
> U.S. treasuries go up. The Pound goes down. The Euro goes up as do gold
> and the Swiss Franc.
>
> Who is the biggest trader in U.S. treasuries? Cantor Fitzgerald, owner
> of eSpeed, whose New York offices were on the 101st-105th floors of One
> World Trade Center.
>
> ESpeed stock was shorted 42 percent of its value from August 7 to
> September 7, 2001 and no one seems to know why.
>
> Coming Monday: 9/11 and the Mob by Judi McLeod & David Hawkins.
>
> Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod is an award-winning
> journalist with 30 years experience in the media. A former Toronto Sun
> and Kingston Whig Standard columnist, she has also appeared on
> Newsmax.com, the Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and World Net Daily. Judi
> can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com.
> http://www.canadafreepress.com/2005/cover070905a.htm
>

---

Trunte wrote:
> Nogen speciel grund til at du sender nedenstående klipperier i to
> tråde.

Ja. Den ene tråd samler jeg hele molevitten op i. Så generer det ikke
dem, der ellers ville blive generet af mange poster om emnet. Og dette
bringer jeg i en selvstændig tråd - alene fordi det er så utroligt.

Men vi får sikkert syn for sagn snart. Dennne historie kan umuligt (tror
jeg) ignoreres, hvis der virkelig var det program på BBC Radio 5.

Og hvis programmet ikke var der, så bliver det en af Alex Jones værste
beter nogensinde. Vi får se.

---

Det er meget nærliggende at tro, at terrorismen er noget, den vestlige
verden selv har skabt, på den ene eller anden måde.

---

"Fætter Maddike" <fm@hair.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:Xns968FE604F1B5Afmhaircom@216.196.109.144...
> Det er meget nærliggende at tro, at terrorismen er noget, den vestlige
> verden selv har skabt, på den ene eller anden måde.

Du har fuldstændig ret. Muhamedanerne er for dumme til selv at kunne opfinde
bomber og elektronisk udstyr. Vi har formodentligt selv fremstillet det udstyr
som de muhamedanske helligkrigere bruger mod os.
--
NoTrabajo

---

"NoTrabajo" <trabajono@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:42d18bd5$0$18637$14726298@news.sunsite.dk:

>
> "Fætter Maddike" <fm@hair.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:Xns968FE604F1B5Afmhaircom@216.196.109.144...
>> Det er meget nærliggende at tro, at terrorismen er noget, den
>> vestlige verden selv har skabt, på den ene eller anden måde.
>
> Du har fuldstændig ret. Muhamedanerne er for dumme til selv at kunne
> opfinde bomber og elektronisk udstyr. Vi har formodentligt selv
> fremstillet det udstyr som de muhamedanske helligkrigere bruger mod
> os.

Har du et konkret og håndgribeligt bevis for, at det du tror er rigtigt?
Var det ikke USA selv, der oplærte de hellige krigere i Afghanistan, så de
kunne kæmpe sammen mod den røde hær? Var det ikke USA selv, der skabte
Saddam Hussein? Er det ikke USA, der helst ser, at hele verden bliver
McDonaldiseret, koste hvad det vil, og er det så mærkeligt, at ikke alle er
enige med USA om, hvordan et samfund skal bygges op?

---

"Fætter Maddike" <fm@hair.com> wrote in message
news:Xns968FEAFE9BFD8fmhaircom@216.196.109.144...
> "NoTrabajo" <trabajono@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:42d18bd5$0$18637$14726298@news.sunsite.dk:
>
>>
>> "Fætter Maddike" <fm@hair.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>> news:Xns968FE604F1B5Afmhaircom@216.196.109.144...
>>> Det er meget nærliggende at tro, at terrorismen er noget, den
>>> vestlige verden selv har skabt, på den ene eller anden måde.
>>
>> Du har fuldstændig ret. Muhamedanerne er for dumme til selv at kunne
>> opfinde bomber og elektronisk udstyr. Vi har formodentligt selv
>> fremstillet det udstyr som de muhamedanske helligkrigere bruger mod
>> os.
>
> Har du et konkret og håndgribeligt bevis for, at det du tror er rigtigt?
> Var det ikke USA selv, der oplærte de hellige krigere i Afghanistan, så de
> kunne kæmpe sammen mod den røde hær? Var det ikke USA selv, der skabte
> Saddam Hussein? Er det ikke USA, der helst ser, at hele verden bliver
> McDonaldiseret, koste hvad det vil, og er det så mærkeligt, at ikke alle
> er
> enige med USA om, hvordan et samfund skal bygges op?

Kan du ikke rette dit pseudonym fra "Fætter Maddike" til "surt opstød".

Thorkild

---

"Thorkild Poulsen" <thor@superthorkild.fjerndette.dk> wrote in
news:42d1e4d2$0$29898$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk:

> Kan du ikke rette dit pseudonym fra "Fætter Maddike" til "surt
> opstød".

Hvad er den store forskel?

---

NoTrabajo <trabajono@hotmail.com> skrev:
>
>"Fætter Maddike" <fm@hair.com> skrev i
>en meddelelse
>news:Xns968FE604F1B5Afmhaircom@216.196 .109.144...
>> Det er meget nærliggende at tro, at
>>terrorismen er noget, den vestlige
>> verden selv har skabt, på den ene
>>eller anden måde.
>
>Du har fuldstændig ret. Muhamedanerne
>er for dumme til selv at kunne opfinde
>bomber og elektronisk udstyr. Vi har
>formodentligt selv fremstillet det udstyr
>som de muhamedanske helligkrigere
>bruger mod os.
>--
>NoTrabajo

Nu kræver det jo ikke ligefrem en hjernetrust at koble et alarm-ur
til en bunke sprængstof ... Selv du kan finde ud af det, efter
lidt træning.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d1685e$0$172$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

[Snip en masse konspirationsteorier]

Er du ikke begyndt at blive lidt Steen Hjortsøe-agtig?

---

Martin Kristensen wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d1685e$0$172$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
> [Snip en masse konspirationsteorier]
>
> Er du ikke begyndt at blive lidt Steen Hjortsøe-agtig?

Det kan du mene om, hvad du vil.

Mange mennesker kan ikke kontaine verdenen udenfor lamestreams
overskrifter - og selv det er vanskeligt for dem.

Du kan forholde dig til artiklens meddelelse og henvisning til BBC 5 om:

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an
exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on
simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it
happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck
standing up right now.

Eller du kan lade være - hvis det er for hårdt for dig.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d25410$0$185$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

> Eller du kan lade være - hvis det er for hårdt for dig.

Jeg har bare ikke tid til at læse kæmpemæssige cut'n'pastede indlæg, men en
masse links man også lige skal igennem for at få det hele med. Hvorfor skal
konspirationsteori-indlæg altid være sådan? Kan det ikke lade sig gøre at
opsummere i korte træk, hvad det går ud på, ligesom med alle andre emner?

---

Martin Kristensen wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d25410$0$185$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
>> Eller du kan lade være - hvis det er for hårdt for dig.
>
> Jeg har bare ikke tid til at læse kæmpemæssige cut'n'pastede indlæg,
> men en masse links man også lige skal igennem for at få det hele med.
> Hvorfor skal konspirationsteori-indlæg altid være sådan? Kan det ikke
> lade sig gøre at opsummere i korte træk, hvad det går ud på, ligesom
> med alle andre emner?

Du saksede lige den korte opsummering af det vigtige.

At Power fortæller, han foretog en stor øvelse samme dag på samme
tidspunkt på de samme steder, hvor bomberne gik af. Og øvelsen handlede
om bomber, der gik af "simultaneously".

Og det var nøjagtigt, hvad der skete.

Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running
a drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London
Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was
happening in real life on July 7th.

In a BBC Radio 5 interview which was aired on that very evening, July
7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor
Consultants, a firm which labels itself as a 'crisis management' advice
company, also known as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time
with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Visor's managing director told the radio show's host that at the exact
same time as the London bombings were taking place, his company was
running a 1,000 person strong exercise drill in which the London
Underground was being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact
same times, as happened in real life.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d26ac6$0$163$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.

Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr. Power's
firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at springe bomber?

---

"Martin Kristensen" <dont_sp@m.me> wrote in message
news:42d26c15$0$18642$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...

(...)
> > Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
>
> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr. Power's
> firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at springe bomber?

Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser samtidigt
med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen og tilsvarende der
hopper på den slags kook nonsens.

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

Thomas K wrote:
> "Martin Kristensen" <dont_sp@m.me> wrote in message
> news:42d26c15$0$18642$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
>
> (...)
>>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
>>
>> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
>> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr.
>> Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at
>> springe bomber?
>
> Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser
> samtidigt med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen og
> tilsvarende der hopper på den slags kook nonsens.

Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.

Og det ser unægteligt ud til at være præcis, hvad der skete.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d3ac14$0$176$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.

Kan komme med nogen links direkte fra de pågældende medier, som ikke er et
eller andet "prison planet" site, der bare påstår at tingene kommer fra
diverse kendte medier?

---

Martin Kristensen wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d3ac14$0$176$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
>> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.
>
> Kan komme med nogen links direkte fra de pågældende medier, som ikke
> er et eller andet "prison planet" site, der bare påstår at tingene
> kommer fra diverse kendte medier?

Øh ... Alle linkene foreligger jo i tråden.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d3ac14$0$176$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
> >>
> >> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
> >> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr.
> >> Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at
> >> springe bomber?
> >
> > Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser
> > samtidigt med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen og
> > tilsvarende der hopper på den slags kook nonsens.
>
> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.

Skriver de at det er de samme der afholdt terrorøvelser og sprang bomberne,
som du implicerer? Link please.

(...)
> Og det ser unægteligt ud til at være præcis, hvad der skete.

Altså samme "man" i ovenstående?

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

Thomas Krogh wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d3ac14$0$176$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
> (...)
>>>>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
>>>>
>>>> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
>>>> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr.
>>>> Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at
>>>> springe bomber?
>>>
>>> Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser
>>> samtidigt med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen og
>>> tilsvarende der hopper på den slags kook nonsens.
>>
>> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.
>
> Skriver de at det er de samme der afholdt terrorøvelser og sprang
> bomberne, som du implicerer?

Det implicerer jeg ingen steder gamle dreng. Læs det, du prøver at svare
på.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d449c5$0$180$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >>>>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
> >>>>
> >>>> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle de
> >>>> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr.
> >>>> Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at
> >>>> springe bomber?
> >>>
> >>> Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser
> >>> samtidigt med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen og
> >>> tilsvarende der hopper på den slags kook nonsens.
> >>
> >> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.
> >
> > Skriver de at det er de samme der afholdt terrorøvelser og sprang
> > bomberne, som du implicerer?
>
> Det implicerer jeg ingen steder gamle dreng. Læs det, du prøver at svare
på.

OK. Så forklar:

"Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På en-eller-anden måde
siger du jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke andet så for ata have
bestilt det - er de samme.

For det er vel ikke bare ordkløveri, vel?

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

Thomas Krogh wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d449c5$0$180$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
> (...)
>>>>>>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt. Men hvad skulle
>>>>>> de konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at
>>>>>> give Hr. Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har
>>>>>> tænkt sig at springe bomber?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hvad skulle idéen overhovedet være at "man" afholdt terrorøvelser
>>>>> samtidigt med at "man" sprang bomber? Det er sgudda kun Svendsen
>>>>> og tilsvarende der hopper på den slags kook nonsens.
>>>>
>>>> Og bbc og cbc og itn osv.
>>>
>>> Skriver de at det er de samme der afholdt terrorøvelser og sprang
>>> bomberne, som du implicerer?
>>
>> Det implicerer jeg ingen steder gamle dreng. Læs det, du prøver at
>> svare på.
>
> OK. Så forklar:
>
> "Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På
> en-eller-anden måde siger du jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke
> andet så for ata have bestilt det - er de samme.

Nu ikke alene vrøvler du. Nu snakker du også sort. At sammenfaldet ikke
er tilfældigt er på ingen måde det samme, som at jeg implicerer, at
Powers og Co skulle være dem, der sprang bomberne. Kan du virkelig ikke
selv regne det ud, eller skal jeg stave det for dig?

> For det er vel ikke bare ordkløveri, vel?

Ha. Dit intellekt ville ikke engang kunne kløve en fritstående budding.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d44e98$0$173$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >>> Skriver de at det er de samme der afholdt terrorøvelser og sprang
> >>> bomberne, som du implicerer?
> >>
> >> Det implicerer jeg ingen steder gamle dreng. Læs det, du prøver at
> >> svare på.
> >
> > OK. Så forklar:
> >
> > "Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På
> > en-eller-anden måde siger du jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke
> > andet så for ata have bestilt det - er de samme.
>
> Nu ikke alene vrøvler du. Nu snakker du også sort. At sammenfaldet ikke
> er tilfældigt er på ingen måde det samme, som at jeg implicerer, at
> Powers og Co skulle være dem, der sprang bomberne.

"om ikke at så for at have bestilt det" skrev jeg. Misforstår og mistolker
du altid alting med vilje? Eller ordkløver du bare som du plejer.

(...)
> Kan du virkelig ikke selv regne det ud, eller skal jeg stave det for dig?

Ordkløveri altså.

(...)
> > For det er vel ikke bare ordkløveri, vel?
>
> Ha. Dit intellekt ville ikke engang kunne kløve en fritstående budding.

Det er da også dig der er ordkløveren. Helt som det plejer.

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

Thomas Krogh wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d44e98$0$173$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...


>>>> Det implicerer jeg ingen steder gamle dreng. Læs det, du prøver at
>>>> svare på.
>>>
>>> OK. Så forklar:
>>>
>>> "Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På
>>> en-eller-anden måde siger du jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke
>>> andet så for ata have bestilt det - er de samme.
>>
>> Nu ikke alene vrøvler du. Nu snakker du også sort. At sammenfaldet
>> ikke er tilfældigt er på ingen måde det samme, som at jeg
>> implicerer, at Powers og Co skulle være dem, der sprang bomberne.
>
> "om ikke at så for at have bestilt det" skrev jeg.

Ja, du skriver en masse vås.

>> Kan du virkelig ikke selv regne det ud, eller skal jeg stave det for
>> dig?
>
> Ordkløveri altså.

Du kan selvfølgelig ikke regne ud, at sammenfaldets utilfældighed
naturligvis ikke er den latterlige implicering, du fantaserede dig frem
til. Men impliceringen er der ikke, og du må bare leve med, at der er en
uendelighed af ting, der aldrig går op for dig. Det går selvfølgelig
heller ikke op for dig.

>>> For det er vel ikke bare ordkløveri, vel?
>>
>> Ha. Dit intellekt ville ikke engang kunne kløve en fritstående
>> budding.
>
> Det er da også dig der er ordkløveren.

Næh, jeg har ikke kløvet et eneste ord i denne sammenhæng, men da du er
en kook og en ubehjælpsom en af slagsen, så er du selvfølgelig nødt til
hele tiden at rode dig ud i nye mængder af vrøvl og fremvisning af din
fjogethed.

Som altid med dig.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42deec9e$0$187$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >>> "Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På
> >>> en-eller-anden måde siger du jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke
> >>> andet så for ata have bestilt det - er de samme.
> >>
> >> Nu ikke alene vrøvler du. Nu snakker du også sort. At sammenfaldet
> >> ikke er tilfældigt er på ingen måde det samme, som at jeg
> >> implicerer, at Powers og Co skulle være dem, der sprang bomberne.
> >
> > "om ikke at så for at have bestilt det" skrev jeg.
>
> Ja, du skriver en masse vås.

Jamen du svarer jo ikke på spørgsmålet. Hvorfor lader du som om du ikke
forstod det?

(...)
> > Ordkløveri altså.
>
> Du kan selvfølgelig ikke regne ud, at sammenfaldets utilfældighed
> naturligvis ikke er den latterlige implicering, du fantaserede dig frem
> til. Men impliceringen er der ikke, og du må bare leve med, at der er en
> uendelighed af ting, der aldrig går op for dig. Det går selvfølgelig
> heller ikke op for dig.

Vil det sige at du alligevel ikke implicerer dem der måtte have bestilt
øvelsen hos Power og co i terrorangrebet?

(...)
> >>> For det er vel ikke bare ordkløveri, vel?
> >>
> >> Ha. Dit intellekt ville ikke engang kunne kløve en fritstående
> >> budding.
> >
> > Det er da også dig der er ordkløveren.
>
> Næh, jeg har ikke kløvet et eneste ord i denne sammenhæng, men da du er
> en kook og en ubehjælpsom en af slagsen, så er du selvfølgelig nødt til
> hele tiden at rode dig ud i nye mængder af vrøvl og fremvisning af din
> fjogethed.

Jeg prøver bare at forstå hvad det er du er ved at rode dig ud i nu. Det
sker jo tit at du roder dig ind i noget frygteligt nonsens, fordi du
ukritisk efterplaprer en række kook-sites du falder over på nettet. Du kan
godt huske det også var det der skete med den "pod" der skulle være under
een af de fly der ramte WTC, ikke?

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

Thomas Krogh <thomas_alfa@hotFJERNmail.com> skrev:
>"Henrik Svendsen"
><HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:42deec9e$0$187$edfadb0f@dtext01
>.news.tele.dk...
>
>(...)
>> >>> "Et sådan sammenfald er
>> >>>selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.". På
>> >>> en-eller-anden måde siger du
>> >>>jo at de endeligt ansvarlige - om ikke
>> >>> andet så for ata have bestilt
>> >>>det - er de samme.
>> >>
>> >> Nu ikke alene vrøvler du. Nu
>> >>snakker du også sort. At sammenfaldet
>> >> ikke er tilfældigt er på ingen
>> >>måde det samme, som at jeg
>> >> implicerer, at Powers og Co
>> >>skulle være dem, der sprang bomberne.
>> >
>> > "om ikke at så for at have
>> >bestilt det" skrev jeg.
>>
>> Ja, du skriver en masse vås.
>
>Jamen du svarer jo ikke på
>spørgsmålet. Hvorfor lader du som om du ikke
>forstod det?
>
>(...)
>> > Ordkløveri altså.
>>
>> Du kan selvfølgelig ikke regne ud,
>>at sammenfaldets utilfældighed
>> naturligvis ikke er den latterlige
>>implicering, du fantaserede dig frem
>> til. Men impliceringen er der
>>ikke, og du må bare leve med, at der er en
>> uendelighed af ting, der aldrig
>>går op for dig. Det går selvfølgelig
>> heller ikke op for dig.
>
>Vil det sige at du alligevel ikke
>implicerer dem der måtte have bestilt
>øvelsen hos Power og co i
>terrorangrebet?
>
>(...)
>> >>> For det er vel ikke bare
>> >>>ordkløveri, vel?
>> >>
>> >> Ha. Dit intellekt ville ikke
>> >>engang kunne kløve en fritstående
>> >> budding.
>> >
>> > Det er da også dig der er ordkløveren.
>>
>> Næh, jeg har ikke kløvet et eneste
>>ord i denne sammenhæng, men da du er
>> en kook og en ubehjælpsom en af
>>slagsen, så er du selvfølgelig nødt til
>> hele tiden at rode dig ud i nye
>>mængder af vrøvl og fremvisning af din
>> fjogethed.
>
>Jeg prøver bare at forstå hvad det
>er du er ved at rode dig ud i nu. Det
>sker jo tit at du roder dig ind i
>noget frygteligt nonsens, fordi du
>ukritisk efterplaprer en række
>kook-sites du falder over på nettet. Du kan
>godt huske det også var det der
>skete med den "pod" der skulle være under
>een af de fly der ramte WTC, ikke?
>
>mvh
>
>Thomas Krogh

hehe ... nu varer det ikke længe før Henrik Svendsen kommer med en
perfid forklaring om, at han er en rigtig mand, der er blevet
hærdet gennem dk.mudderkast. Og at alle andre er bøsser uden viden
og forståelse for hans utrolige intellekt.

---

Peter Bang (slet 89RGO) wrote:

> hehe ... nu varer det ikke længe før Henrik Svendsen kommer med en
> perfid forklaring om, at han er en rigtig mand, der er blevet
> hærdet gennem dk.mudderkast. Og at alle andre er bøsser uden viden
> og forståelse for hans utrolige intellekt.

Hehe, hvor er det sjovt, at du stadig klynker over, at jeg kaldte dig en
blød bøsse. Tænk at sådan en selvglad mudderkaster som du ikke kan tage
det .. tsk tsk.

---

Thomas Krogh wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42deec9e$0$187$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

>> Ja, du skriver en masse vås.
>
> Jamen du svarer jo ikke på spørgsmålet. Hvorfor lader du som om du
> ikke forstod det?

Først kom du i din ret personlige verden frem til, at jeg skulle
implicere de samme, der afholdt øvelsen, hvilket var Visor, og da jeg så
fortæller dig, at jeg selvfølgelig ikke implicerede dem, hvilket er et
svar.

Nu laver du det så om til "de endeligt ansvarlige", hvilket selvfølgelig
ikke er Visor. Og hvis jeg så svarer på det, hvilket jeg allerede har
gjort andetsteds i tråden, så gentager du sikkert bare spørgsmålet en
gang til. Prøv først at se om du kan finde mit svar på "de endeligt
ansvarlige". Jeg gider ikke lige skulle gentage mig i en uendelighed. Du
stiller jo også et andet spørgsmål om og om igen i den anden tråd, vi
har gang i - selv om jeg forlængst har svaret - også der.

>> Næh, jeg har ikke kløvet et eneste ord i denne sammenhæng, men da du
>> er en kook og en ubehjælpsom en af slagsen, så er du selvfølgelig
>> nødt til hele tiden at rode dig ud i nye mængder af vrøvl og
>> fremvisning af din fjogethed.
>
> Jeg prøver bare at forstå hvad det er du er ved at rode dig ud i nu.

Muligvis; men det ser mere ud til, at ligegyldigt hvor mange gange man
svarer dig, så spørger du bare igen.

> Det sker jo tit at du roder dig ind i noget frygteligt nonsens, fordi
> du ukritisk efterplaprer en række kook-sites du falder over på
> nettet.

Jeg har da aldrig efterplapret noget at det, du skriver.

> Du kan godt huske det også var det der skete med den "pod"
> der skulle være under een af de fly der ramte WTC, ikke?

Nej. Den dag i dag ved jeg stadig ikke, hvad den "pod", som du kalder
den, significerede. Dengang syntes jeg det så højst besynderligt ud, og
der var forskellige dramatiske bud, der dog ikke rigtig gav nogen
mening. Jeg havde egentlig opgivet at finde og hale i den historie; men
hvis du kender slutningen på den, så læser jeg det gerne.

---

Martin Kristensen wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d26ac6$0$163$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
>> Et sådan sammenfald er selvsagt _ikke_ tilfældigt.
>
> Næh, hvis det er rigtigt lyder det da mærkeligt.

Det er rigtigt.

> Men hvad skulle de
> konspirerende bagmænd få ud af at afsløre sig selv ved at give Hr.
> Power's firma de steder og tidspunkter, hvor de har tænkt sig at
> springe bomber?

Hehe. Du rammer muligvis hovedet lige på sømmet. Du skal bare ændre din
forestilling om hvem, der står bag (er terroristerne), og vupti, så har
du et motiv.

Det siger vist sig selv, at det ikke er en flok arabere, der har givet
Powers firma den opgave at holde den antiterroristbombeøvelse i
undergrunden.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d3a8ea$1$159$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

> Du skal bare ændre din
> forestilling om hvem, der står bag (er terroristerne), og vupti, så har
> du et motiv.
>
> Det siger vist sig selv, at det ikke er en flok arabere, der har givet
> Powers firma den opgave at holde den antiterroristbombeøvelse i
> undergrunden.

Jeg kan stadig ikke se noget motiv. Kan du ikke forklare, hvad det er
ikke-araber-terroristerne skulle have ud af at give Powers firma tid/sted
for deres bombninger?

---

Martin Kristensen wrote:
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d3a8ea$1$159$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
>> Du skal bare ændre din
>> forestilling om hvem, der står bag (er terroristerne), og vupti, så
>> har du et motiv.
>>
>> Det siger vist sig selv, at det ikke er en flok arabere, der har
>> givet Powers firma den opgave at holde den antiterroristbombeøvelse i
>> undergrunden.
>
> Jeg kan stadig ikke se noget motiv. Kan du ikke forklare, hvad det er
> ikke-araber-terroristerne skulle have ud af at give Powers firma
> tid/sted for deres bombninger?

Det stopper rutinemæssig overvågning, når lokale myndigheder oplyses om,
at der er terrorøvelser. Så antager de, at terroristagtige personer og
begivenheder er en naturlig del af øvelsen. Skulle en eller anden
politimand tilfældigvis opdage et eller andet mystisk, der er i gære og
rapportere ind om det, så får han at vide, at der finder en
antiterrorøvelse sted. For det gør der jo.

---

"Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
news:42d3acb9$0$160$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >> Du skal bare ændre din
> >> forestilling om hvem, der står bag (er terroristerne), og vupti, så
> >> har du et motiv.
> >>
> >> Det siger vist sig selv, at det ikke er en flok arabere, der har
> >> givet Powers firma den opgave at holde den antiterroristbombeøvelse i
> >> undergrunden.
> >
> > Jeg kan stadig ikke se noget motiv. Kan du ikke forklare, hvad det er
> > ikke-araber-terroristerne skulle have ud af at give Powers firma
> > tid/sted for deres bombninger?
>
> Det stopper rutinemæssig overvågning, når lokale myndigheder oplyses om,
> at der er terrorøvelser. Så antager de, at terroristagtige personer og
> begivenheder er en naturlig del af øvelsen. Skulle en eller anden
> politimand tilfældigvis opdage et eller andet mystisk, der er i gære og
> rapportere ind om det, så får han at vide, at der finder en
> antiterrorøvelse sted. For det gør der jo.

Hvor siger Power at det er en øvelse der afholdes i selve
undergrundssystemet? SVJKS er det en "crisis management" øvelse.

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:12:18 +0200, "Henrik Svendsen"
<HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote:

>Du kan forholde dig til artiklens meddelelse og henvisning til BBC 5 om:
>
>POWER: At half past nine this morning ...

Jeg har ikke kunne finde et transcript fra det radiointerview. Ej
heller en henvisning i et troværdigt medie. Er det ikke mærkværdigt,
at det ikke får mere omtale, hvis det er korrekt?

--
Aggressive conduct, if allowed to go unchallenged,
ultimately leads to war - John F. Kennedy

---

"T. Liljeberg" <tl_dp@adelphia.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:v0g6d1p3sfat89ds8imonlju84pcqgd8fa@4ax.com...

>>POWER: At half past nine this morning ...
>
> Jeg har ikke kunne finde et transcript fra det radiointerview. Ej
> heller en henvisning i et troværdigt medie. Er det ikke mærkværdigt,
> at det ikke får mere omtale, hvis det er korrekt?

Nu også på video,,, fra ITN
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/110705bombingexercises.htm

Jan Rasmussen

---

T. Liljeberg wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:12:18 +0200, "Henrik Svendsen"
> <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote:
>
>> Du kan forholde dig til artiklens meddelelse og henvisning til BBC 5
>> om:
>>
>> POWER: At half past nine this morning ...
>
> Jeg har ikke kunne finde et transcript fra det radiointerview.

Det er ellers inkluderet i første post. Og hele programmet fra BBC 5 er
inkluderet

> Ej
> heller en henvisning i et troværdigt medie.

Er BBC 5 ikke et troværdigt medie? Det var faktisk der, interviewet
fandt sted.

> Er det ikke mærkværdigt,
> at det ikke får mere omtale, hvis det er korrekt?

Jo, det er meget mærkeligt; men her er lidt mere omtale og
_bekræftigelse_ :
http://www.cbc.ca/MRL/clips/rm-lo/charles_disasters050711.rm

Så må du selv beslutte, hvorvidt cbc og bbc er troværdige medier.

---

"Martin Kristensen" <dont_sp@m.me> wrote in message
news:42d24b42$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
> "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:42d1685e$0$172$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>
> [Snip en masse konspirationsteorier]
>
> Er du ikke begyndt at blive lidt Steen Hjortsøe-agtig?
>

Han mangler nu stadig hjernestråle-styring og
"80.000-atombomber-samme-sted-samme-tid"-tidsrejseteorien for bare at komme
tæt på SH

Steen Hjortsøe er et kapitel for sig, på linie med BW og AHW.

Tim

---

"Tim" <thpetersen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42d4e4d8$0$2083$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> > "Henrik Svendsen" <HrSvendsen@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:42d1685e$0$172$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> >
> > [Snip en masse konspirationsteorier]
> >
> > Er du ikke begyndt at blive lidt Steen Hjortsøe-agtig?
> >
>
> Han mangler nu stadig hjernestråle-styring og
> "80.000-atombomber-samme-sted-samme-tid"-tidsrejseteorien for bare at
komme
> tæt på SH
>
> Steen Hjortsøe er et kapitel for sig, på linie med BW og AHW.

HrSvendsen er skam tæt på. Check de forskellige kook-teorier han efterhånden
har postet her i gruppen.

mvh

Thomas Krogh