---

Two Views of History
There are two fundamental ways to view history:
We call one the catastrophic or accidental view of history,
the other we call the conspiratorial view of history.

Accidental History
In the catastrophic or accidental view of history we are
led to believe that historical events, such as wars and revolutions
were the direct result of some sudden or surprising event. While the
catastrophic view is accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes,
it does not always provide a realistic view of humanity and
events influenced by man.

Young, malleable American and other Western minds are sadly
taught the Accidental view of history in the government
school systems. This view is reinforced throughout their
lives by the controlled mass media. As a result, when most
discover the Conspiratorial View of History, the immediate
reaction is shock, disbelief and a refusal to accept something
other than they've been taught to believe.

Conspiratorial History
Conspiratorial history studies that part of history that is
a product of man's planning. In conspiratorial history we are
led to believe that events, such as wars and revolutions, are
the result of planned events. While the conspiratorial view
is not accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes, it
is a realistic and accurate view of the interrelationship
of man and nations. Since the planning for most of these events
was done in secret, we use the term conspiratorial history.
That is; this history is the result of plans constructed in secret,
which by definition is a conspiracy.

Interestingly enough, the Conspiratorial View of History
is also the Biblical View of History. Try Psalms 2 for starters.*

I believe that current world events are not simply circumstantial,
but the result of an organized campaign by an elite group of unseen
and widely unknown world leaders.

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

Jan Rasmussen
"Who Controles The Past Controles the Future
Who Controls the Present Controles the Past
G.O 1984

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i meddelelsen
news:4256a6e8$0$174$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk:

> Two Views of History
> There are two fundamental ways to view history:

There are two kinds of people:

Those that drive Cadillacs
and those who don't.

--
"How much easier is self-sacrifice than self-realization." Eric Hoffer
Med venlig hilsen
GB

---

"G B" <nonono@nospam.invalid> skrev i en meddelelse news:4256b341$0$242$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
> "Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:4256a6e8$0$174$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk:
>
>> Two Views of History
>> There are two fundamental ways to view history:
>
> There are two kinds of people:
>
> Those that drive Cadillacs
> and those who don't.
>

"I've noticed three kinds of people in this world:
those who make things happen, those who watch what happens, and those who wonder what happened."


Jan Rasmussen

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i meddelelsen
news:4256da39$0$183$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk:

> "I've noticed three kinds of people in this world:

Sure you have.

--
"How much easier is self-sacrifice than self-realization." Eric Hoffer
Med venlig hilsen
GB

---

Jan Rasmussen <1@1.1> wrote:

> "G B" <nonono@nospam.invalid> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4256b341$0$242$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
> > "Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i meddelelsen
> > news:4256a6e8$0$174$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk:
> >
> >> Two Views of History
> >> There are two fundamental ways to view history:
> >
> > There are two kinds of people:
> >
> > Those that drive Cadillacs
> > and those who don't.
> >
>
> "I've noticed three kinds of people in this world: those who make things
> happen, those who watch what happens, and those who wonder what happened."
>
>
> Jan Rasmussen

Der er 10 slags mennesker her i verden: Dem der kan regne binært og dem
der ikke kan!
--
Three things are certain: Death, taxes and lost data.
Guess which has occurred. -- David Dixon
http://www.intervocative.com/DVDCollection.aspx/extract

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4256a6e8$0$174$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> Two Views of History
> There are two fundamental ways to view history:
> We call one the catastrophic or accidental view of history,
> the other we call the conspiratorial view of history.
>
> Accidental History
> In the catastrophic or accidental view of history we are
> led to believe that historical events, such as wars and revolutions
> were the direct result of some sudden or surprising event. While the
> catastrophic view is accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes,
> it does not always provide a realistic view of humanity and
> events influenced by man.
>
> Young, malleable American and other Western minds are sadly
> taught the Accidental view of history in the government
> school systems. This view is reinforced throughout their
> lives by the controlled mass media. As a result, when most
> discover the Conspiratorial View of History, the immediate
> reaction is shock, disbelief and a refusal to accept something
> other than they've been taught to believe.
>
> Conspiratorial History
> Conspiratorial history studies that part of history that is
> a product of man's planning. In conspiratorial history we are
> led to believe that events, such as wars and revolutions, are
> the result of planned events. While the conspiratorial view
> is not accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes, it
> is a realistic and accurate view of the interrelationship
> of man and nations. Since the planning for most of these events
> was done in secret, we use the term conspiratorial history.
> That is; this history is the result of plans constructed in secret,
> which by definition is a conspiracy.
>
> Interestingly enough, the Conspiratorial View of History
> is also the Biblical View of History. Try Psalms 2 for starters.*
>
> I believe that current world events are not simply circumstantial,
> but the result of an organized campaign by an elite group of unseen
> and widely unknown world leaders.
>
> "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned
> that way."
> Franklin D. Roosevelt

Er dette her ikke en dansksproget nyhedsgruppe ?

--
Kim Larsen

Socialist, republikaner, EU-tilhænger og atomkraftmodstander.
Socialisme er den eneste troværdige vej frem.
Husk at krigen i Irak er folkeretligt smask-ulovlig.

Direkte e-mail: kl2607x@yahoo.dk (fjern x´et)

---

"Kim Larsen" <kl2607x@yahoo.dk> skrev i en meddelelse news:1f98e$42579148$3e3d8cd9$24802@nf4.news-service.com...

> Er dette her ikke en dansksproget nyhedsgruppe ?

Jo da, jeg hade da også forestillet mig, at eventuelle disskutioner ville foregå
på Dansk.

Jan Rasmussen

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4257a569$0$163$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> "Kim Larsen" <kl2607x@yahoo.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:1f98e$42579148$3e3d8cd9$24802@nf4.news-service.com...
>
>> Er dette her ikke en dansksproget nyhedsgruppe ?
>
> Jo da, jeg hade da også forestillet mig, at eventuelle disskutioner ville
> foregå
> på Dansk.

Så kunne det være rart med et dansk-sproget oplæg.

--
Kim Larsen

Socialist, republikaner, EU-tilhænger og atomkraftmodstander.
Socialisme er den eneste troværdige vej frem.
Husk at krigen i Irak er folkeretligt smask-ulovlig.

Direkte e-mail: kl2607x@yahoo.dk (fjern x´et)

---

"Kim Larsen" <kl2607x@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:34c96$425922f9$3e3d8cd9$30435@nf4.news-service.com...

(...)
> >> Er dette her ikke en dansksproget nyhedsgruppe ?
> >
> > Jo da, jeg hade da også forestillet mig, at eventuelle disskutioner
ville
> > foregå
> > på Dansk.
>
> Så kunne det være rart med et dansk-sproget oplæg.

Jeg tror ikke den kook-nonsens Jan citerer er oversat til dansk.

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> wrote in message
news:4257a569$0$163$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> > Er dette her ikke en dansksproget nyhedsgruppe ?
>
> Jo da, jeg hade da også forestillet mig, at eventuelle disskutioner ville
foregå
> på Dansk.

Kunne du ikke linke til den kook du har sakset dit citat fra? Sådan for en
god ordens skyld?

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

"Thomas Krogh" <thomas_alfa@hotFJERNmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:4259a3cb$0$174$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...

> Kunne du ikke linke til den kook du har sakset dit citat fra? Sådan for en
> god ordens skyld?

1. Det ville bare flytte opmærksomheden væk fra det emne jeg ville
gøre opmærksom på/disskutere med indlæget.

2. The Two Views of History, er en grundholdning og har ikke noget specielt at
gøre med det site hvor fra det kom.


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/094500110X/102-0690886-7696947?v=glance
"Quigley falls neither into the right- or left-wing camps, and was in fact a liberal
internationalist who held views essentially sympathetic to those of the supposed conspirators.
He did, however, object to the secretiveness with which they pursued their goals."



Jan Rasmussen
http://home19.inet.tele.dk/fs2002/matrix/TheRealMatrix.htm

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> wrote in message
news:425aa9ec$0$167$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> > Kunne du ikke linke til den kook du har sakset dit citat fra? Sådan for
en
> > god ordens skyld?
>
> 1. Det ville bare flytte opmærksomheden væk fra det emne jeg ville
> gøre opmærksom på/disskutere med indlæget.

Bestemt ikke. Det kunne bidrage til at forstå konteksten. Nu er vi lidt
efterladet med et gæt på at det hænger på noget
Illuminati-NWO-Bilderberg-Zionisternekommerefteros kook-nonsens.

Men det er måske heller ikke helt ved siden af?

Iøvrigt er det generelt god tone at opgive en kilde til citater.

(...)
> 2. The Two Views of History, er en grundholdning og har ikke noget
specielt at
> gøre med det site hvor fra det kom.

En grundholdning hos de mest yderligtgående konspirationsfreaks, ja.

(...)
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/094500110X/102-0690886-7696947?v=glance
> "Quigley falls neither into the right- or left-wing camps, and was in fact
a liberal
> internationalist who held views essentially sympathetic to those of the
supposed conspirators.
> He did, however, object to the secretiveness with which they pursued their
goals."

Er det Quigley der udtalte det?

mvh

Thomas Krogh

---

"Thomas Krogh" <thomas_alfa@hotFJERNmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:425adfcd$0$177$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...
> "Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> wrote in message
> news:425aa9ec$0$167$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>> > Kunne du ikke linke til den kook du har sakset dit citat fra? Sådan for en
>> > god ordens skyld?
>>
>> 1. Det ville bare flytte opmærksomheden væk fra det emne jeg ville
>> gøre opmærksom på/disskutere med indlæget.
>
> Bestemt ikke. Det kunne bidrage til at forstå konteksten.

Google , hvis ydeliger information ønskes.

Ganske ligesom det tog dig 5 sekunder at havne på threeworldwars.com

Selvom du mener at det 'Bestemt ikke' flytter opmærksomheden, så er
dine indlæg netop vidner der om.

>Nu er vi lidt efterladet med et gæt
>på at det hænger på noget Illuminati-NWO-Bilderberg-Zionisternekommerefteros kook-nonsens.
> Men det er måske heller ikke helt ved siden af?

I rest my cast.

> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/094500110X/102-0690886-7696947?v=glance
>> "Quigley falls neither into the right- or left-wing camps, and was in fact a liberal
>> internationalist who held views essentially sympathetic to those of the supposed
>> conspirators.He did, however, object to the secretiveness with which they
>> pursued their goals."
>
> Er det Quigley der udtalte det?

Arr prøv lige at kigge igen, udtaler man sådan om sig selv.

Summen af de 21 review's giver et meget godt indtryk af emnet.

"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for
twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to
examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to
most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to
many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently,
to a few of its policies...but in general my chief difference of opinion is
that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is
significant enough to be known."
Dr. Carroll Quigley - Tragedy and Hope


Jan Rasmussen

---

"Jan Rasmussen" <1@1.1> wrote in message
news:425afd46$0$170$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...

(...)
> >> 1. Det ville bare flytte opmærksomheden væk fra det emne jeg ville
> >> gøre opmærksom på/disskutere med indlæget.
> >
> > Bestemt ikke. Det kunne bidrage til at forstå konteksten.
>
> Google , hvis ydeliger information ønskes.
>
> Ganske ligesom det tog dig 5 sekunder at havne på threeworldwars.com
>
> Selvom du mener at det 'Bestemt ikke' flytter opmærksomheden, så er
> dine indlæg netop vidner der om.

Næh, det er det da ikke. Udsagnet giver bare ingen mening uden kontekst.

(...)
> >Nu er vi lidt efterladet med et gæt
> >på at det hænger på noget
Illuminati-NWO-Bilderberg-Zionisternekommerefteros kook-nonsens.
> > Men det er måske heller ikke helt ved siden af?
>
> I rest my cast.

Bullseye altså.

(...)
> >
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/094500110X/102-0690886-7696947?v=glance
> >> "Quigley falls neither into the right- or left-wing camps, and was in
fact a liberal
> >> internationalist who held views essentially sympathetic to those of the
supposed
> >> conspirators.He did, however, object to the secretiveness with which
they
> >> pursued their goals."
> >
> > Er det Quigley der udtalte det?
>
> Arr prøv lige at kigge igen, udtaler man sådan om sig selv.

Det oprindelige udsagn.

mvh

Thomas Krogh