---

Fra en artikel som oprindeligt var trykt i New York Times omkring den
26. marts 2005. Den giver en meget god illustration af hvorledes de
neokonservative ignorerer gravalvorlige fejl.

Mvh

TheCom

Is No One Accountable?
By BOB HERBERT

The Bush administration is desperately trying to keep the full story
from emerging. But there is no longer any doubt that prisoners seized
by the U.S. in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere have been killed,
tortured, sexually humiliated and otherwise grotesquely abused.

These atrocities have been carried out in an atmosphere in which
administration officials have routinely behaved as though they were
above the law, and thus accountable to no one. People have been rounded
up, stripped, shackled, beaten, incarcerated and in some cases killed,
without being offered even the semblance of due process. No charges. No
lawyers. No appeals.

Arkan Mohammed Ali is a 26-year-old Iraqi who was detained by the U.S.
military for nearly a year at various locations, including the infamous
Abu Ghraib prison. According to a lawsuit filed against Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Mr. Ali was at times beaten into
unconsciousness during interrogations. He was stabbed, shocked with an
electrical device, urinated on and kept locked - hooded and naked - in
a wooden, coffinlike box. He said he was told by his captors that
soldiers could kill detainees with impunity.

(This was not a boast from the blue. On Saturday, for example, The
Times reported that the Army would not prosecute 17 American soldiers
implicated in the deaths of three prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.)

Mr. Ali's story is depressingly similar to other accounts pouring in
from detainees, human rights groups, intelligence sources and U.S.
government investigators. If you pay close attention to what is already
known about the sadistic and barbaric treatment of prisoners by the
U.S., you can begin to wonder how far we've come from the Middle Ages.
The alleged heretics hauled before the Inquisition were not permitted
to face their accusers or mount a defense. Innocence was irrelevant.
Torture was the preferred method of obtaining confessions.

No charges were ever filed against Mr. Ali, and he was eventually
released. But what should be of paramount concern to Americans is this
country's precipitous and frightening descent into the hellish zone of
lawlessness that the Bush administration, on the one hand, is trying to
conceal and, on the other, is defending as absolutely essential to its
fight against terror.

The lawsuit against Mr. Rumsfeld was filed by the American Civil
Liberties Union and Human Rights First, a New York-based group, on
behalf of Mr. Ali and seven other former detainees from Iraq and
Afghanistan who claim to have been tortured by U.S. personnel.

The suit charges that Mr. Rumsfeld personally authorized unlawful
interrogation techniques and abdicated his responsibility to stop the
torture and other abuses of prisoners in U.S. custody. It contends that
the abuse of detainees was widespread and that Mr. Rumsfeld and other
top administration officials were well aware of it.

According to the suit, it is unreasonable to believe that Mr. Rumsfeld
could have remained in the dark about the rampant mistreatment of
prisoners in U.S. custody. It cites a wealth of evidence readily
available to the secretary, including the scandalous eruptions at Abu
Ghraib prison, the reports of detainee abuse at Guantánamo Bay, myriad
newspaper and magazine articles, internal U.S. government reports, and
concerns expressed by such reputable groups as the International
Committee of the Red Cross.

(The committee has noted, among other things, that military
intelligence estimates suggest that 70 percent to 90 percent of the
people detained in Iraq had been seized by mistake.)

Whether this suit will ultimately be successful in holding Mr. Rumsfeld
personally accountable is questionable. But if it is thoroughly argued
in the courts, it will raise yet another curtain on the stomach-turning
practices that have shamed the United States in the eyes of the world.

The primary aim of the lawsuit is quite simply to re-establish the rule
of law. "It's that fundamental idea that nobody is above the law," said
Michael Posner, executive director of Human Rights First. "The
violations here were created by policies that deliberately undermined
the rule of law. That needs to be challenged."

Lawlessness should never be an option for the United States. Once the
rule of law has been extinguished, you're left with an environment in
which moral degeneracy can flourish and a great nation can lose its
soul.