/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
Where The Communist Manifesto Meets the ko~
Fra : G.B.


Dato : 05-01-05 21:38

By Michael J. Totten
[Kommentar af GB: Seif betyder "sværd"]

Moammar Ghaddafi's son Seif el-Islam, heir-apparent top-dog in the Great
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahariya, is pretending to pressure the
Arab League to democratize. He's getting a lot of great press in the West
(I goofed and gave him some, too), and he doesn't deserve a bit of it.

This little snippet from the New York Times makes the lad sound like some
kind of hero. "'Democracy is the future,' Mr. Qaddafi, 32, said at his
Moroccan-style villa outside Tripoli, where he keeps a white tiger,
Freddo, among other exotic pets. 'We have to be ahead of the world in our
region, the Middle East, and not to be lagging behind, because the whole
world is heading toward democracy.'"

Sounds great, doesn't it? As if he's a young reformer waiting in the
wings to reform Pop's idiotic and oppressive regime. Don't get carried
away. He and his old man have funny definitions of democracy and
dictatorship.

Here is Moammar Ghaddafi in the manifesto he calls The Green Book.

"Political struggle that results in the victory of a candidate with, for
example, 51 percent of the vote leads to a dictatorial governing body in
the guise of false democracy, since 49 percent of the electorate is ruled
by an instrument of government they did not vote for, but which has been
imposed upon them. Such is dictatorship."

Clever. If multi-party elections lead to dictatorship, the solution must
be...a one-party state. Better yet, a no-party state.

So Ghaddafi (who, make no mistake, holds absolute power in Libya) came up
with what he calls "direct democracy" where there are no elections of any
kind -- ever. Forming a political party is a hanging offense. His
government is the only one that supposedly represents everyone because
unity is imposed by force. Elections would destroy Libya's "direct
democracy" by dividing it.

This is what his son Seif el-Islam means when he pressures the Arab
League to democratize and when he boasts about it to foreign reporters.

I'm not putting Dad's words in the kid's mouth. He admits it himself in
the very same New York Times interview because he doesn't know how to
fake it.

"My father has been promoting the idea of direct democracy in Libya for
almost 26 years now. It's quite rational and logical that we have to
continue in that direction."

I suppose this might fool some people if they don't know anything about
Libya's politics. But no one in the West will be fooled by the following:
"'We don't have an opposition -- there is no opposition,' he said,
asserting that there were 'just five people' seriously opposed to the
current government and that all of them were in the United States."

I know three expatriate Libyans in the U.S. who hate Ghaddafi's regime.
It's hard to believe I've stumbled upon more than half of them. I could
give you their names except that Ghaddafi is known to send death squads
abroad to hunt down such people and kill them.

Two months ago I spent a week in Libya and can assure you I met more than
five people who don't like Ghaddafi. Since one person in six works for
the mukhabarat -- the secret police -- everyone who dared express his
opinion did so only with the utmost caution in absolute privacy. Usually
their antagonism was expressed in offhand comments and wisecracks. But
one shopkeeper spoke passionately on behalf of most of this countrymen
and said "we hate that fucking bastard, we have nothing to do with him."

To understand what Boy Ghaddafi is doing you have to know what his dad
has been up to since he seized power.

Libya's state ideology as described in the Green Book is Ghaddafi's
unexportable "Third Universal Theory," the first being capitalism and the
second being communism. The Green Book is basically a merger between The
Communist Manifesto and The Koran with all the religious references
deceptively secularized. The results are, as might be expected, brutal
and totalitarian.

He's been pushing this system on the Middle East and Africa for decades
on a number of fronts. Newspapers throughout the Middle East, backed with
Libyan money, push his agenda. He has doled out money and guns to
sympathetic revolutionaries and terrorists. The only thing new here is
the messenger, the rhetoric, and the (thankfully) less violent tactics.
Ghaddafi's son deserves no credit, no applause, and certainly no good
press in the West. It's time to call him out as the punk he is.

Michael J. Totten is a TCS columnist. Visit his daily Web log at
http://michaeltotten.com.

--
"We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they
who need public cures for their private ails." Eric Hoffer
Med venlig hilsen
Georg

 
 
#2066 (06-01-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : #2066


Dato : 06-01-05 02:51


Aka: Hvor telefonterrorister moeder Hjemmevaernets haemorroider.




Poul (06-01-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Poul


Dato : 06-01-05 10:38


"#2066" <neslein@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:36f78$41dc98f4$45c2b067$24894@nf5.news-service.com...
>
> Aka: Hvor telefonterrorister moeder Hjemmevaernets haemorroider.
>

He he
se iøvrigt "Muhamedaner i solcenter" på News:dk.binaer




Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177523
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408674
Brugere : 218887

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste