/ Forside / Teknologi / Udvikling / Java / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Java
#NavnPoint
molokyle 3688
Klaudi 855
strarup 740
Forvirret 660
gøgeungen 500
Teil 373
Stouenberg 360
vnc 360
pmbruun 341
10  mccracken 320
JBuilder vs JDevelopper
Fra : cdeoliveira@dijon.at~


Dato : 13-12-00 14:57

I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
machine.
I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
Lite and JDeveloper.

What do you think?



 
 
N/A (14-12-2000)
Kommentar
Fra : N/A


Dato : 14-12-00 08:16



Dennis Thrysøe (14-12-2000)
Kommentar
Fra : Dennis Thrysøe


Dato : 14-12-00 08:16

As far as I know, JDeveloper are slightly modified versions of Borlands
previous JBuilder versions (JDeveloper 3 would be based on JBuilder 2...).

-dennis

crg wrote:

> JBuilder 4 or JBuilder 3?
> JBuilder 4 is an improvement on 3 and has some nice features. I am currently
> trying it instead of JDeveloper but I'm not yet convinced it is better than
> JDeveloper. If you use JBuilder 4 make sure youve got at least 128MB RAM, if
> not more ... and a fast processor.
> JBuilder 3 .... forget it IMHO
>
> For the database access stuff I use the Oracle JDBC libraries direct to
> Oracle 8.1.6 so I've no idea what would be better for your app.
>
> C
>
> <cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr> wrote in message
> news:917v9p$d3l$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net...
>
>> I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
>> machine.
>> I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
>> administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
>> Lite and JDeveloper.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>


Mark Stephens (14-12-2000)
Kommentar
Fra : Mark Stephens


Dato : 14-12-00 20:13

I defected to VisualCafe and have returned to JBuilder 4, which is very
nice. Don't other with JBuilder 3. If you access the DB through JDBC, you
should be able to make the product more scaleable/easy to deveop.

Regards,

MArk

crg <craig.gould@*REMOVE.THIS*bt.com> wrote in message
news:918322$lgb$1@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk...
> JBuilder 4 or JBuilder 3?
> JBuilder 4 is an improvement on 3 and has some nice features. I am
currently
> trying it instead of JDeveloper but I'm not yet convinced it is better
than
> JDeveloper. If you use JBuilder 4 make sure youve got at least 128MB RAM,
if
> not more ... and a fast processor.
> JBuilder 3 .... forget it IMHO
>
> For the database access stuff I use the Oracle JDBC libraries direct to
> Oracle 8.1.6 so I've no idea what would be better for your app.
>
> C
>
> <cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr> wrote in message
> news:917v9p$d3l$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net...
> > I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
> > machine.
> > I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO
database
> > administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
> > Lite and JDeveloper.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
>
>



Pedro Jesus (14-12-2000)
Kommentar
Fra : Pedro Jesus


Dato : 14-12-00 17:06

cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr wrote:

> I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
> machine.
> I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
> administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
> Lite and JDeveloper.
>
> What do you think?

Have you tried JBuilder 4 and pointbase ( www.pointbase.com ) ?

--
Pedro Jesus
Quadriga, SA

http://www.quadriga.pt
eMail: pedro.jesus@quadriga.pt
Phone: (+351) 21.413 56 70



Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177501
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408527
Brugere : 218887

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste